IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pop/procee/v8y2020p321-329.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Overview of smart governance: A new approach to Jambi city policy innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Rio Yusri MAULANA

    (Faculty of Public Administration, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia)

Abstract

The concept of the smart city established as a solution of the urban complex problem. The goal of the smart city concept is modern urban management using technical tools that offer state-of-the-art technologies, considering the applicable ecological standards while saving resources and achieving the expected results. In line with this, the government needs to build integrated information, communication and technology services. Therefore, the government has legalized a regulation relating to smart city policy. In 2019, Indonesia introduce The Movement Towards 100 Smart Cities as the jointprograms implemented by Ministry of Communication and Information, Ministry of Home Affairs, National Development Planning Agency and the Presidential Staff Office. The program aims to guide districts / cities in formulating Smart City master plans in order to further maximize the use of technology through digital transformation, both in improving community services and accelerating the potential resources that exists in each local government. Governments need to step up their efforts to fulfil the basic infrastructure needs of citizens, raise more revenue, construct clear regulatory frameworks to mitigate the technological risks involved, develop human capital, ensure digital inclusivity, and promote environmentalsustainability. This article use qualitiative with descriptive approach to examines the state of smart city development in Indonesian local government especially in the aspect of smart governance that have been implemented through 2017-2020, which includes understanding the conceptualisations,motivations, and unique drivers behind (and barriers to) smarty city implementation, which so far contributed to the development of 50 innovation-based applications in the City of Jambi.

Suggested Citation

  • Rio Yusri MAULANA, 2020. "Overview of smart governance: A new approach to Jambi city policy innovation," Smart Cities International Conference (SCIC) Proceedings, Smart-EDU Hub, Faculty of Public Administration, National University of Political Studies & Public Administration, vol. 8, pages 321-329, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:pop:procee:v:8:y:2020:p:321-329
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.scrd.eu/index.php/scic/article/view/344/309
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.scrd.eu/index.php/scic/article/view/344
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lazaroiu, George Cristian & Roscia, Mariacristina, 2012. "Definition methodology for the smart cities model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 326-332.
    2. Simon Joss & Matthew Cook & Youri Dayot, 2017. "Smart Cities: Towards a New Citizenship Regime? A Discourse Analysis of the British Smart City Standard," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 29-49, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Johannes Stübinger & Lucas Schneider, 2020. "Understanding Smart City—A Data-Driven Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-23, October.
    2. Shahid Nawaz Khan & Syed Ali Abbas Kazmi & Abdullah Altamimi & Zafar A. Khan & Mohammed A. Alghassab, 2022. "Smart Distribution Mechanisms—Part I: From the Perspectives of Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-109, December.
    3. Sabina Baraniewicz-Kotasińska, 2022. "The Scandinavian Third Way as a Proposal for Sustainable Smart City Development—A Case Study of Aarhus City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-24, March.
    4. Joshua Olusegun FAYOMI, 2016. "The place of the virtual workplaces in developing smart urban centres," Smart Cities International Conference (SCIC) Proceedings, Smart-EDU Hub, Faculty of Public Administration, National University of Political Studies & Public Administration, vol. 4, pages 196-205, November.
    5. Caprotti, Federico & Liu, Dong, 2020. "Emerging platform urbanism in China: Reconfigurations of data, citizenship and materialities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    6. Thanh Nguyen, Phong & Anh Nguyen, Thu & Huynh Tat Tran, Thang, 2021. "Barrier Factors Affecting Development of Intelligent Transport System Projects," MPRA Paper 112006, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 09 Dec 2021.
    7. Łukasz Brzeziński & Magdalena Krystyna Wyrwicka, 2022. "Fundamental Directions of the Development of the Smart Cities Concept and Solutions in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-52, November.
    8. Oleg Golubchikov & Mary J. Thornbush, 2022. "Smart Cities as Hybrid Spaces of Governance: Beyond the Hard/Soft Dichotomy in Cyber-Urbanization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-12, August.
    9. Magdalena Grebosz-Krawczyk, 2021. "Place branding (r)evolution: the management of the smart city’s brand," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(1), pages 93-104, March.
    10. Renata Biadacz & Marek Biadacz, 2021. "Implementation of “Smart” Solutions and An Attempt to Measure Them: A Case Study of Czestochowa, Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-28, September.
    11. Nielsen, Brita Fladvad & Baer, Daniela & Lindkvist, Carmel, 2019. "Identifying and supporting exploratory and exploitative models of innovation in municipal urban planning; key challenges from seven Norwegian energy ambitious neighborhood pilots," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 142-153.
    12. Margarida Rodrigues & Mário Franco, 2018. "Measuring the Performance in Creative Cities: Proposal of a Multidimensional Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-21, November.
    13. Shanghao Wang & Xuan Zheng, 2024. "Influence of public health emergency on city image: the case of COVID-19 stigma on Wuhan city," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    14. Izabela Jonek-Kowalska & Radosław Wolniak, 2022. "Sharing Economies’ Initiatives in Municipal Authorities’ Perspective: Research Evidence from Poland in the Context of Smart Cities’ Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-22, February.
    15. Mehtap ÇAKMAK BARSBAY & M. Kemal OKTEM, 2019. "Can we use waste generation as a smart indicator?," Smart Cities International Conference (SCIC) Proceedings, Smart-EDU Hub, Faculty of Public Administration, National University of Political Studies & Public Administration, vol. 7, pages 51-64, November.
    16. Nishimwe, Antoinette Marie Reine & Reiter, Sigrid, 2021. "Building heat consumption and heat demand assessment, characterization, and mapping on a regional scale: A case study of the Walloon building stock in Belgium," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    17. Justyna Patalas-Maliszewska & Hanna Łosyk & Jacek Newelski, 2021. "Modeling the Effectiveness of Intelligent Systems in Public Transport That Uses Low-Carbon Energy: A Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-13, May.
    18. Wang, Yuanping & Ren, Hong & Dong, Liang & Park, Hung-Suck & Zhang, Yuepeng & Xu, Yanwei, 2019. "Smart solutions shape for sustainable low-carbon future: A review on smart cities and industrial parks in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 103-117.
    19. Nilssen, Maja, 2019. "To the smart city and beyond? Developing a typology of smart urban innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 98-104.
    20. Trencher, Gregory, 2019. "Towards the smart city 2.0: Empirical evidence of using smartness as a tool for tackling social challenges," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 117-128.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Smart governance; public services; digital transformation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O35 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Social Innovation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pop:procee:v:8:y:2020:p:321-329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Professor Catalin Vrabie (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fasnsro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.