IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0266244.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Choosing optimal trigger points for ex situ, in toto conservation of single population threatened species

Author

Listed:
  • Kaitlyn Brown
  • Tamara Tambyah
  • Jack Fenwick
  • Patrick Grant
  • Michael Bode

Abstract

Many endangered species exist in only a single population, and almost all species that go extinct will do so from their last remaining population. Understanding how to best conserve these single population threatened species (SPTS) is therefore a distinct and important task for threatened species conservation science. As a last resort, managers of SPTS may consider taking the entire population into captivity–ex situ, in toto conservation. In the past, this choice has been taken to the great benefit of the SPTS, but it has also lead to catastrophe. Here, we develop a decision-support tool for planning when to trigger this difficult action. Our method considers the uncertain and ongoing decline of the SPTS, the possibility that drastic ex situ action will fail, and the opportunities offered by delaying the decision. Specifically, these benefits are additional time for ongoing in situ actions to succeed, and opportunities for the managers to learn about the system. To illustrate its utility, we apply the decision tool to four retrospective case-studies of declining SPTS. As well as offering support to this particular decision, our tool illustrates why trigger points for difficult conservation decisions should be formulated in advance, but must also be adaptive. A trigger-point for the ex situ, in toto conservation of a SPTS, for example, will not take the form of a simple threshold abundance.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaitlyn Brown & Tamara Tambyah & Jack Fenwick & Patrick Grant & Michael Bode, 2022. "Choosing optimal trigger points for ex situ, in toto conservation of single population threatened species," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(4), pages 1-12, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0266244
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266244
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0266244
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0266244&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0266244?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bode, Michael & Possingham, Hugh, 2007. "Can culling a threatened species increase its chance of persisting?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 201(1), pages 11-18.
    2. Richard Bellman, 1954. "Some Applications of the Theory of Dynamic Programming---A Review," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 2(3), pages 275-288, August.
    3. Richard Bellman, 1954. "On some applications of the theory of dynamic programming to logistics," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(2), pages 141-153, June.
    4. Davis, Graham A. & Cairns, Robert D., 2012. "Good timing: The economics of optimal stopping," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 255-265.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaoyue Li & John M. Mulvey, 2023. "Optimal Portfolio Execution in a Regime-switching Market with Non-linear Impact Costs: Combining Dynamic Program and Neural Network," Papers 2306.08809, arXiv.org.
    2. Mahmoud Mahfouz & Angelos Filos & Cyrine Chtourou & Joshua Lockhart & Samuel Assefa & Manuela Veloso & Danilo Mandic & Tucker Balch, 2019. "On the Importance of Opponent Modeling in Auction Markets," Papers 1911.12816, arXiv.org.
    3. Boute, Robert N. & Gijsbrechts, Joren & van Jaarsveld, Willem & Vanvuchelen, Nathalie, 2022. "Deep reinforcement learning for inventory control: A roadmap," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(2), pages 401-412.
    4. Dawei Chen & Fangxu Mo & Ye Chen & Jun Zhang & Xinyu You, 2022. "Optimization of Ramp Locations along Freeways: A Dynamic Programming Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-13, August.
    5. Harrold, Daniel J.B. & Cao, Jun & Fan, Zhong, 2022. "Data-driven battery operation for energy arbitrage using rainbow deep reinforcement learning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PC).
    6. Vanvuchelen, Nathalie & De Boeck, Kim & Boute, Robert N., 2024. "Cluster-based lateral transshipments for the Zambian health supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 313(1), pages 373-386.
    7. Bartłomiej Kocot & Paweł Czarnul & Jerzy Proficz, 2023. "Energy-Aware Scheduling for High-Performance Computing Systems: A Survey," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-28, January.
    8. Wadi Khalid Anuar & Lai Soon Lee & Hsin-Vonn Seow & Stefan Pickl, 2021. "A Multi-Depot Vehicle Routing Problem with Stochastic Road Capacity and Reduced Two-Stage Stochastic Integer Linear Programming Models for Rollout Algorithm," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(13), pages 1-44, July.
    9. Peter Schober & Julian Valentin & Dirk Pflüger, 2022. "Solving High-Dimensional Dynamic Portfolio Choice Models with Hierarchical B-Splines on Sparse Grids," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 59(1), pages 185-224, January.
    10. Matthias Breuer & David Windisch, 2019. "Investment Dynamics and Earnings‐Return Properties: A Structural Approach," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(3), pages 639-674, June.
    11. Diefenbach, Heiko & Emde, Simon & Glock, Christoph H., 2020. "Loading tow trains ergonomically for just-in-time part supply," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(1), pages 325-344.
    12. Michael J. Pennock & William B. Rouse & Diane L. Kollar, 2007. "Transforming the Acquisition Enterprise: A Framework for Analysis and a Case Study of Ship Acquisition," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(2), pages 99-117, June.
    13. Quetschlich, Mathias & Moetz, André & Otto, Boris, 2021. "Optimisation model for multi-item multi-echelon supply chains with nested multi-level products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(1), pages 144-158.
    14. Iman Ahmadianfar & Saeed Noshadian & Nadir Ahmed Elagib & Meysam Salarijazi, 2021. "Robust Diversity-based Sine-Cosine Algorithm for Optimizing Hydropower Multi-reservoir Systems," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(11), pages 3513-3538, September.
    15. Li, Yapeng & Tang, Xiaolin & Lin, Xianke & Grzesiak, Lech & Hu, Xiaosong, 2022. "The role and application of convex modeling and optimization in electrified vehicles," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    16. Ge, Fangsheng & Beullens, Patrick & Hudson, Dominic, 2021. "Optimal economic ship speeds, the chain effect, and future profit potential," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 168-196.
    17. Wadi Khalid Anuar & Lai Soon Lee & Hsin-Vonn Seow & Stefan Pickl, 2022. "A Multi-Depot Dynamic Vehicle Routing Problem with Stochastic Road Capacity: An MDP Model and Dynamic Policy for Post-Decision State Rollout Algorithm in Reinforcement Learning," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(15), pages 1-70, July.
    18. Sasanka Adikari & Norou Diawara, 2024. "Utility in Time Description in Priority Best–Worst Discrete Choice Models: An Empirical Evaluation Using Flynn’s Data," Stats, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-18, February.
    19. Coit, David W. & Zio, Enrico, 2019. "The evolution of system reliability optimization," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    20. Peng, Hujun & Li, Jianxiang & Löwenstein, Lars & Hameyer, Kay, 2020. "A scalable, causal, adaptive energy management strategy based on optimal control theory for a fuel cell hybrid railway vehicle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0266244. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.