IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0262883.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Weighted assignment fusion algorithm of evidence conflict based on Euclidean distance and weighting strategy, and application in the wind turbine system

Author

Listed:
  • Liming Gou
  • Jian Zhang
  • Naiwen Li
  • Zongshui Wang
  • Jindong Chen
  • Lin Qi

Abstract

In the process of intelligent system operation fault diagnosis and decision making, the multi-source, heterogeneous, complex, and fuzzy characteristics of information make the conflict, uncertainty, and validity problems appear in the process of information fusion, which has not been solved. In this study, we analyze the credibility and variation of conflict among evidence from the perspective of conflict credibility weight and propose an improved model of multi-source information fusion based on Dempster-Shafer theory (DST). From the perspectives of the weighting strategy and Euclidean distance strategy, we process the basic probability assignment (BPA) of evidence and assign the credible weight of conflict between evidence to achieve the extraction of credible conflicts and the adoption of credible conflicts in the process of evidence fusion. The improved algorithm weakens the problem of uncertainty and ambiguity caused by conflicts in the information fusion process, and reduces the impact of information complexity on analysis results. And it carries a practical application out with the fault diagnosis of wind turbine system to analyze the operation status of wind turbines in a wind farm to verify the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm. The result shows that under the conditions of improved distance metric evidence discrepancy and credible conflict quantification, the algorithm better shows the conflict and correlation among the evidence. It improves the accuracy of system operation reliability analysis, improves the utilization rate of wind energy resources, and has practical implication value.

Suggested Citation

  • Liming Gou & Jian Zhang & Naiwen Li & Zongshui Wang & Jindong Chen & Lin Qi, 2022. "Weighted assignment fusion algorithm of evidence conflict based on Euclidean distance and weighting strategy, and application in the wind turbine system," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-20, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0262883
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262883
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0262883
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0262883&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0262883?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marzieh Mokarram & Hamid Reza Pourghasemi & John P. Tiefenbacher, 2020. "Using Dempster–Shafer theory to model earthquake events," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 103(2), pages 1943-1959, September.
    2. Wen Jiang & Shiyu Wang & Xiang Liu & Hanqing Zheng & Boya Wei, 2017. "Evidence conflict measure based on OWA operator in open world," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-18, May.
    3. Tian, Qun & Huang, Gang & Hu, Kaiming & Niyogi, Dev, 2019. "Observed and global climate model based changes in wind power potential over the Northern Hemisphere during 1979–2016," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 1224-1235.
    4. Tangfan Xiahou & Yu Liu, 2020. "Reliability bounds for multi-state systems by fusing multiple sources of imprecise information," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(9), pages 1014-1031, September.
    5. Atiye Sarabi-Jamab & Babak N Araabi, 2020. "An information-based approach to handle various types of uncertainty in fuzzy bodies of evidence," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Shuangyi & Li, Xichen, 2021. "Future projections of offshore wind energy resources in China using CMIP6 simulations and a deep learning-based downscaling method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    2. Li, He & Liu, Pan & Guo, Shenglian & Cheng, Lei & Huang, Kangdi & Feng, Maoyuan & He, Shaokun & Ming, Bo, 2021. "Deriving adaptive long-term complementary operating rules for a large-scale hydro-photovoltaic hybrid power plant using ensemble Kalman filter," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    3. Yilin Dong & Xinde Li & Yihai Liu, 2018. "A fast combination method in DSmT and its application to recommender system," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-25, January.
    4. Miao, Haozeyu & Xu, Haiming & Huang, Gang & Yang, Kai, 2023. "Evaluation and future projections of wind energy resources over the Northern Hemisphere in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 809-821.
    5. Yu, Shuang & Vautard, Robert, 2022. "A transfer method to estimate hub-height wind speed from 10 meters wind speed based on machine learning," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    6. Martinez, A. & Iglesias, G., 2024. "Global wind energy resources decline under climate change," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    7. Xiao, Hui & Lin, Chen & Kou, Gang & Peng, Rui, 2022. "Reliability modeling and configuration optimization of a photovoltaic based electric power generation system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    8. Miao, Haozeyu & Dong, Danhong & Huang, Gang & Hu, Kaiming & Tian, Qun & Gong, Yuanfa, 2020. "Evaluation of Northern Hemisphere surface wind speed and wind power density in multiple reanalysis datasets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    9. Liu, Fa & Wang, Xunming & Sun, Fubao & Kleidon, Axel, 2023. "Potential impact of global stilling on wind energy production in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PB).
    10. Costoya, X. & deCastro, M. & Santos, F. & Sousa, M.C. & Gómez-Gesteira, M., 2019. "Projections of wind energy resources in the Caribbean for the 21st century," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 356-367.
    11. Li, Xiang-Yu & Li, Xiaopeng & Feng, Jianxiang & Li, Congming & Xiong, Xiaoyan & Huang, Hong-Zhong, 2023. "Reliability analysis and optimization of multi-phased spaceflight with backup missions and mixed redundancy strategy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    12. Martinez, A. & Murphy, L. & Iglesias, G., 2023. "Evolution of offshore wind resources in Northern Europe under climate change," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0262883. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.