IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0262253.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The publicness enigma: Can perceived publicness predict employees’ formal and prosocial behavior across sectors?

Author

Listed:
  • Yinnon Dryzin-Amit
  • Dana R Vashdi
  • Eran Vigoda-Gadot

Abstract

The meaning of Publicness for organizations and for individuals has received growing attention in the public administration literature in recent years. We adopt a perceived publicness perspective to expand our understanding of the publicness concept and operationalize this perception as a means to predict employees’ formal and prosocial behaviors across sectors. Using a recently developed Publicness Perceptions Scale (PPS), we present and empirically examine a model regarding the direct and indirect relationships among perceived publicness, employees’ engagement, and their performance in public and hybrid organizations. Findings based on a field study of 340 employees from governmental (i.e. public) and non-governmental (i.e. hybrid) organizations reveal that perceived publicness has a positive relationship with Organizational Citizenship Behaviors (OCB) and that this relationship is largely mediated by employees’ engagement. In addition, in non-government organizations perceived publicness is negatively related to employees’ in-role performance. We thus contribute to the theoretical knowledge on publicness at the perceptual level and point to its role in formal and informal performance across sectors. Other theoretical, methodological, and practical implications are discussed, and directions for future studies are suggested.

Suggested Citation

  • Yinnon Dryzin-Amit & Dana R Vashdi & Eran Vigoda-Gadot, 2022. "The publicness enigma: Can perceived publicness predict employees’ formal and prosocial behavior across sectors?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-23, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0262253
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262253
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0262253
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0262253&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0262253?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vogel, Dominik & Willems, Jurgen, 2020. "The Effects of Making Public Service Employees Aware of Their Prosocial and Societal Impact: A Microintervention study," SocArXiv xatcn, Center for Open Science.
    2. Ann P. Bartel & Ann E. Harrison, 2005. "Ownership Versus Environment: Disentangling the Sources of Public-Sector Inefficiency," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 87(1), pages 135-147, February.
    3. Yishaiya Abosch, 2006. "The Conscientious Sovereign: Public and Private Rule in Thomas Hobbes's Early Discourses," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 50(3), pages 621-633, July.
    4. Young-Hyun Yeo & Keon-Hyung Lee & Suk-Won Ryu, 2018. "Effect of publicness on government control and organizational citizenship behavior: an empirical study from public organizations in Korea and Japan," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(4), pages 203-218, October.
    5. Christian Lo, 2018. "Between Government and Governance: Opening the Black Box of the Transformation Thesis," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(8), pages 650-656, June.
    6. Carolyn J. Heinrich & Elizabeth Fournier, 2004. "Dimensions of publicness and performance in substance abuse treatment organizations," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(1), pages 49-70.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ashantha Ranasinghe & Xuejuan Su, 2023. "When social assistance meets market power: A mixed duopoly view of health insurance in the United States," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 61(4), pages 851-869, October.
    2. Sourafel Girma & Yundan Gong & Holger Görg, 2016. "Foreign Direct Investment, Access to Finance, and Innovation Activity in Chinese Enterprises," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: MULTINATIONAL ENTERPRISES AND HOST COUNTRY DEVELOPMENT Volume 53: World Scientific Studies in International Economics, chapter 5, pages 79-94, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    3. Lu, Susan Feng & Dranove, David, 2013. "Profiting from gaizhi: Management buyouts during China’s privatization," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 634-650.
    4. Harrison, Ann E. & Lin, Justin Yifu & Xu, Lixin Colin, 2014. "Explaining Africa’s (Dis)advantage," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 59-77.
    5. Matthias Arnold, Jens & Javorcik, Beata S., 2009. "Gifted kids or pushy parents? Foreign direct investment and plant productivity in Indonesia," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(1), pages 42-53, September.
    6. Le, Manh-Duc & Pieri, Fabio & Zaninotto, Enrico, 2019. "From central planning towards a market economy: The role of ownership and competition in Vietnamese firms’ productivity," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 693-716.
    7. Baird, Matthew & Chari, A.V. & Nataraj, Shanthi & Rothenberg, Alexander & Telhaj, Shqiponja & Winters, L. Alan, 2019. "The public sector and the misallocation of labor: evidence from a policy experiment in India," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 102605, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Caroline Stiel, 2017. "Modern Public Enterprises: Organisational Innovation and Productivity," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1713, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    9. Jonathan Rauh, 2015. "Problems in Identifying Public and Private Organizations: A Demonstration Using a Simple Naive Bayesian Classification," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 33-47, March.
    10. Ádám Szentpéteri & Álmos Telegdy, 2010. "Political Selection Of Firms Into Privatization Programs. Evidence From Romanian Comprehensive Data," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(3), pages 298-328, November.
    11. Harrison, Ann & Rodríguez-Clare, Andrés, 2010. "Trade, Foreign Investment, and Industrial Policy for Developing Countries," Handbook of Development Economics, in: Dani Rodrik & Mark Rosenzweig (ed.), Handbook of Development Economics, edition 1, volume 5, chapter 0, pages 4039-4214, Elsevier.
    12. Dmitri Vinogradov & Elena Shadrina & Marina Doroshenko, 2018. "KIBS for public needs," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 45(4), pages 443-473, December.
    13. Woodward, Albert & Das, Abhik & Raskin, Ira E. & Morgan-Lopez, Antonio A., 2006. "An exploratory analysis of treatment completion and client and organizational factors using hierarchical linear modeling," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 335-351, November.
    14. Francis Y. Owusu, 2012. "Organizational culture and public sector reforms in a post–Washington consensus era: Lessons from Ghana’s good reformers," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 12(2-3), pages 135-151, July.
    15. Maria Bas & Antoine Berthou, 2021. "Financial development, reallocation and growth: Firm heterogeneity matters," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(5), pages 1205-1231, May.
    16. Roberto A. Trevino & Alan J. Richard, 2012. "Public Funding and Affordability of Substance Abuse Treatment Services," American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Science Publications, vol. 4(1), pages 72-83, February.
    17. Maria Bas & Antoine Berthou, 2012. "The Unequal Effects of Financial Development on Firms' Growth in India," Working Papers 2012-22, CEPII research center.
    18. Andersson, Fredrik & Jordahl, Henrik, 2011. "Outsourcing Public Services: Ownership, Competition, Quality and Contracting," Working Paper Series 874, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    19. Kyung Hwan Yun & Jiatao Li & Chenguang Hu, 2024. "State dominance over the market: Reexamining the survival of China’s state-owned enterprises," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 437-474, March.
    20. Leroy White & Andy Lockett & Graeme Currie & James Hayton, 2021. "Hybrid Context, Management Practices and Organizational Performance: A Configurational Approach," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(3), pages 718-748, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0262253. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.