IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0262177.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Machine learning classification of trajectories from molecular dynamics simulations of chromosome segregation

Author

Listed:
  • David Geisel
  • Peter Lenz

Abstract

In contrast to the well characterized mitotic machinery in eukaryotes it seems as if there is no universal mechanism organizing chromosome segregation in all bacteria. Apparently, some bacteria even use combinations of different segregation mechanisms such as protein machines or rely on physical forces. The identification of the relevant mechanisms is a difficult task. Here, we introduce a new machine learning approach to this problem. It is based on the analysis of trajectories of individual loci in the course of chromosomal segregation obtained by fluorescence microscopy. While machine learning approaches have already been applied successfully to trajectory classification in other areas, so far it has not been possible to use them to discriminate segregation mechanisms in bacteria. A main obstacle for this is the large number of trajectories required to train machine learning algorithms that we overcome here by using trajectories obtained from molecular dynamics simulations. We used these trajectories to train four different machine learning algorithms, two linear models and two tree-based classifiers, to discriminate segregation mechanisms and possible combinations of them. The classification was performed once using the complete trajectories as high-dimensional input vectors as well as on a set of features which were used to transform the trajectories into low-dimensional input vectors for the classifiers. Finally, we tested our classifiers on shorter trajectories with duration times comparable (or even shorter) than typical experimental trajectories and on trajectories measured with varying temporal resolutions. Our results demonstrate that machine learning algorithms are indeed capable of discriminating different segregation mechanisms in bacteria and to even resolve combinations of the mechanisms on rather short time scales.

Suggested Citation

  • David Geisel & Peter Lenz, 2022. "Machine learning classification of trajectories from molecular dynamics simulations of chromosome segregation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-33, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0262177
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262177
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0262177
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0262177&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0262177?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fabai Wu & Aleksandre Japaridze & Xuan Zheng & Jakub Wiktor & Jacob W. J. Kerssemakers & Cees Dekker, 2019. "Direct imaging of the circular chromosome in a live bacterium," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, December.
    2. Aleksandre Japaridze & Christos Gogou & Jacob W. J. Kerssemakers & Huyen My Nguyen & Cees Dekker, 2020. "Direct observation of independently moving replisomes in Escherichia coli," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Ting Hou & Guangyong Zheng & Pingyu Zhang & Jia Jia & Jing Li & Lu Xie & Chaochun Wei & Yixue Li, 2014. "LAceP: Lysine Acetylation Site Prediction Using Logistic Regression Classifiers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-7, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Miloš Tišma & Florian Patrick Bock & Jacob Kerssemakers & Hammam Antar & Aleksandre Japaridze & Stephan Gruber & Cees Dekker, 2024. "Direct observation of a crescent-shape chromosome in expanded Bacillus subtilis cells," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Janni Harju & Muriel C. F. Teeseling & Chase P. Broedersz, 2024. "Loop-extruders alter bacterial chromosome topology to direct entropic forces for segregation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Qiqige Wuyun & Wei Zheng & Yanping Zhang & Jishou Ruan & Gang Hu, 2016. "Improved Species-Specific Lysine Acetylation Site Prediction Based on a Large Variety of Features Set," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-21, May.
    4. Konrad Gras & David Fange & Johan Elf, 2024. "The Escherichia coli chromosome moves to the replisome," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    5. Chen Zhang & Asha Mary Joseph & Laurent Casini & Justine Collier & Anjana Badrinarayanan & Suliana Manley, 2024. "Chromosome organization shapes replisome dynamics in Caulobacter crescentus," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0262177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.