IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0261985.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of selenium supplementation on glycemic control markers in healthy rodents: A systematic review protocol

Author

Listed:
  • Rannapaula Lawrynhuk Urbano Ferreira
  • Ângela Waleska Freire de Sousa
  • Antonio Gouveia Oliveira
  • Adriana Augusto de Rezende
  • Ricardo Ney Cobucci
  • Lucia Fatima Campos Pedrosa

Abstract

Background: In vivo and in vitro studies have shown that Se has an insulin-mimetic action associated with its antioxidant activity. Other studies, in turn, suggest that high Se doses and high selenoprotein expression interfere with insulin signaling. This study aims to evaluate the effects of Se supplementation on glycemic control markers in healthy rodents. Methods: The protocol was developed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Metaanalysis Protocol (PRISMA-P) and was published in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews database (PROSPERO; CRD4202121201142019119181). Experimental, randomized, or non-randomized studies of healthy rodents models will be included. All forms of supplemented Se will be considered, including organic, inorganic, and synthetic compounds, selenium-enriched yeasts, zerovalent Se nanoparticles, and selenized polysaccharides. Fasting blood glucose will be considered the primary outcome. Homeostatic model assessment, plasma and erythrocyte Se concentration, GPX activity, SELENOP concentration, and other Se biomarkers will be considered secondary outcomes. EMBASE, Scopus, Pubmed/Medline, Web of Science, and CINAHL will be searched for articles published with no language restrictions. Two reviewers will independently conduct the search and selection of articles, data extraction, and quality analysis. The risk of bias and methodological quality analyses of the included studies will be performed using the Systematic Review Center for Laboratory Animal Experimentation (SYRCLE) and Collaborative Approach to Meta-Analysis and Review (CAMARADES) tools, respectively. The results will be presented as a narrative synthesis according to the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) Reporting Guideline. Meta-analyses will be conducted where appropriate using random-effects models. Discussion: The review may clarify the interaction between different forms of supplemented Se and glycemic control in rodents models. The results will provide evidence that will help select doses and forms of Se to administer in clinical trials while according to impact on the glycemic control while elucidating mechanisms of Se metabolism.

Suggested Citation

  • Rannapaula Lawrynhuk Urbano Ferreira & Ângela Waleska Freire de Sousa & Antonio Gouveia Oliveira & Adriana Augusto de Rezende & Ricardo Ney Cobucci & Lucia Fatima Campos Pedrosa, 2022. "Effects of selenium supplementation on glycemic control markers in healthy rodents: A systematic review protocol," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(4), pages 1-9, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0261985
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261985
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0261985
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0261985&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0261985?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Moher & Alessandro Liberati & Jennifer Tetzlaff & Douglas G Altman & The PRISMA Group, 2009. "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-6, July.
    2. Kanani K. M. Lee, 2009. "The enigma of D′′," Nature, Nature, vol. 462(7274), pages 731-732, December.
    3. Katharina F Mueller & Matthias Briel & Daniel Strech & Joerg J Meerpohl & Britta Lang & Edith Motschall & Viktoria Gloy & Francois Lamontagne & Dirk Bassler, 2014. "Dissemination Bias in Systematic Reviews of Animal Research: A Systematic Review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-15, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Changcheng Guo & Bin Yang & Wenyu Gu & Bo Peng & Shengqiang Xia & Fengqiang Yang & Deyi Wen & Jiang Geng & Yuanyuan Zhang & Junhua Zheng, 2013. "Intravesical Resiniferatoxin for the Treatment of Storage Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Patients with Either Interstitial Cystitis or Detrusor Overactivity: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Victoria T Hunniford & Joshua Montroy & Dean A Fergusson & Marc T Avey & Kimberley E Wever & Sarah K McCann & Madison Foster & Grace Fox & Mackenzie Lafreniere & Mira Ghaly & Sydney Mannell & Karolina, 2021. "Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of preclinical systematic reviews," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(5), pages 1-17, May.
    3. İlkay Unay-Gailhard & Mark A. Brennen, 2022. "How digital communications contribute to shaping the career paths of youth: a review study focused on farming as a career option," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(4), pages 1491-1508, December.
    4. Mahin Ghafari & Vali Baigi & Zahra Cheraghi & Amin Doosti-Irani, 2016. "The Prevalence of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Iranian Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-10, June.
    5. Elizabeth T Cafiero-Fonseca & Andrew Stawasz & Sydney T Johnson & Reiko Sato & David E Bloom, 2017. "The full benefits of adult pneumococcal vaccination: A systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, October.
    6. Santos Urbina & Sofía Villatoro & Jesús Salinas, 2021. "Self-Regulated Learning and Technology-Enhanced Learning Environments in Higher Education: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-12, June.
    7. Oded Berger-Tal & Alison L Greggor & Biljana Macura & Carrie Ann Adams & Arden Blumenthal & Amos Bouskila & Ulrika Candolin & Carolina Doran & Esteban Fernández-Juricic & Kiyoko M Gotanda & Catherine , 2019. "Systematic reviews and maps as tools for applying behavioral ecology to management and policy," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(1), pages 1-8.
    8. Nadine Desrochers & Adèle Paul‐Hus & Jen Pecoskie, 2017. "Five decades of gratitude: A meta‐synthesis of acknowledgments research," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 68(12), pages 2821-2833, December.
    9. Maryono, Maryono & Killoes, Aditya Marendra & Adhikari, Rajendra & Abdul Aziz, Ammar, 2024. "Agriculture development through multi-stakeholder partnerships in developing countries: A systematic literature review," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    10. Alene Sze Jing Yong & Yi Heng Lim & Mark Wing Loong Cheong & Ednin Hamzah & Siew Li Teoh, 2022. "Willingness-to-pay for cancer treatment and outcome: a systematic review," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 23(6), pages 1037-1057, August.
    11. Xue-Ying Xu & Hong Kong & Rui-Xiang Song & Yu-Han Zhai & Xiao-Fei Wu & Wen-Si Ai & Hong-Bo Liu, 2014. "The Effectiveness of Noninvasive Biomarkers to Predict Hepatitis B-Related Significant Fibrosis and Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-16, June.
    12. Vicente Miñana-Signes & Manuel Monfort-Pañego & Javier Valiente, 2021. "Teaching Back Health in the School Setting: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-18, January.
    13. Agnieszka A. Tubis & Katarzyna Grzybowska, 2022. "In Search of Industry 4.0 and Logistics 4.0 in Small-Medium Enterprises—A State of the Art Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-26, November.
    14. Obsa Urgessa Ayana & Jima Degaga, 2022. "Effects of rural electrification on household welfare: a meta-regression analysis," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 69(2), pages 209-261, June.
    15. Caloffi, Annalisa & Colovic, Ana & Rizzoli, Valentina & Rossi, Federica, 2023. "Innovation intermediaries' types and functions: A computational analysis of the literature," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    16. García-Poole, Chloe & Byrne, Sonia & Rodrigo, María José, 2019. "How do communities intervene with adolescents at psychosocial risk? A systematic review of positive development programs," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 194-209.
    17. Jie Zhao & Ji Chen & Damien Beillouin & Hans Lambers & Yadong Yang & Pete Smith & Zhaohai Zeng & Jørgen E. Olesen & Huadong Zang, 2022. "Global systematic review with meta-analysis reveals yield advantage of legume-based rotations and its drivers," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    18. Qing Ye & Bao-Xin Qian & Wei-Li Yin & Feng-Mei Wang & Tao Han, 2016. "Association between the HFE C282Y, H63D Polymorphisms and the Risks of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease, Liver Cirrhosis and Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis o," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-17, September.
    19. Bishal Mohindru & David Turner & Tracey Sach & Diana Bilton & Siobhan Carr & Olga Archangelidi & Arjun Bhadhuri & Jennifer A. Whitty, 2020. "Health State Utility Data in Cystic Fibrosis: A Systematic Review," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 13-25, March.
    20. Subramaniam, Mega & Pang, Natalie & Morehouse, Shandra & Asgarali-Hoffman, S. Nisa, 2020. "Examining vulnerability in youth digital information practices scholarship: What are we missing or exhausting?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0261985. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.