IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0245187.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A dynamic generalized fuzzy multi-criteria croup decision making approach for green supplier segmentation

Author

Listed:
  • Do Anh Duc
  • Luu Huu Van
  • Vincent F Yu
  • Shuo-Yan Chou
  • Ngo Van Hien
  • Ngo The Chi
  • Dinh Van Toan
  • Luu Quoc Dat

Abstract

Supplier selection and segmentation are crucial tasks of companies in order to reduce costs and increase the competitiveness of their goods. To handle uncertainty and dynamicity in the supplier segmentation problem, this research thus proposes a new dynamic generalized fuzzy multi-criteria group decision making (MCGDM) approach from the aspects of capability and willingness and with respect to environmental issues. The proposed approach defines the aggregated ratings of alternatives, the aggregated weights of criteria, and the weighted ratings by using generalized fuzzy numbers with the effect of time weight. Next, we determine the ranking order of alternatives via a popular centroid-index ranking approach. Finally, two case studies demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed dynamic approach. The applications show that the proposed appoach is effective in solving the MCGDM in vague environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Do Anh Duc & Luu Huu Van & Vincent F Yu & Shuo-Yan Chou & Ngo Van Hien & Ngo The Chi & Dinh Van Toan & Luu Quoc Dat, 2021. "A dynamic generalized fuzzy multi-criteria croup decision making approach for green supplier segmentation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(1), pages 1-13, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0245187
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245187
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0245187
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0245187&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0245187?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hosseini, Seyedmohsen & Morshedlou, Nazanin & Ivanov, Dmitry & Sarder, M.D. & Barker, Kash & Khaled, Abdullah Al, 2019. "Resilient supplier selection and optimal order allocation under disruption risks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 124-137.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fakhradin Ghasemi & Mohammad Babamiri & Zahra Pashootan, 2022. "A comprehensive method for the quantification of medication error probability based on fuzzy SLIM," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Thalles Vitelli Garcez & Helder Tenório Cavalcanti & Adiel Teixeira de Almeida, 2021. "A hybrid decision support model using Grey Relational Analysis and the Additive-Veto Model for solving multicriteria decision-making problems: an approach to supplier selection," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 304(1), pages 199-231, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lin, Edward M.H. & Sun, Edward W. & Yu, Min-Teh, 2020. "Behavioral data-driven analysis with Bayesian method for risk management of financial services," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    2. Dmitry Ivanov, 2022. "Viable supply chain model: integrating agility, resilience and sustainability perspectives—lessons from and thinking beyond the COVID-19 pandemic," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 1411-1431, December.
    3. Maciej Urbaniak & Piotr Rogala & Piotr Kafel, 2023. "Expectations of manufacturing companies regarding future priorities of improvement actions taken by their suppliers," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 296-310, March.
    4. Antonio Zavala-Alcívar & María-José Verdecho & Juan-José Alfaro-Saiz, 2020. "A Conceptual Framework to Manage Resilience and Increase Sustainability in the Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-38, August.
    5. Shraddha Mishra & Surya Prakash Singh, 2022. "Designing dynamic reverse logistics network for post-sale service," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 310(1), pages 89-118, March.
    6. Yanting Huang & Benrong Zheng & Zongjun Wang, 2023. "Supplier–remanufacturing and manufacturer–remanufacturing in a closed-loop supply chain with remanufacturing cost disruption," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 61-92, May.
    7. Ana Maria Corrales-Estrada & Loyda Lily Gómez-Santos & Cesar Augusto Bernal-Torres & Jaime Eric Rodriguez-López, 2021. "Sustainability and Resilience Organizational Capabilities to Enhance Business Continuity Management: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-25, July.
    8. Sawik, Tadeusz, 2022. "Stochastic optimization of supply chain resilience under ripple effect: A COVID-19 pandemic related study," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    9. Yang, Qihui & Scoglio, Caterina M. & Gruenbacher, Don M., 2021. "Robustness of supply chain networks against underload cascading failures," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 563(C).
    10. Guo, Yan & Yu, Xinning & Zhou, Caifeng & Lyu, Gaoyan, 2021. "Government subsidies for preventing supply disruption when the supplier has an outside option under competition," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    11. Garvey, Myles D. & Carnovale, Steven, 2020. "The rippled newsvendor: A new inventory framework for modeling supply chain risk severity in the presence of risk propagation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    12. Belleh Fontem & Megan Price, 2021. "Joint client selection and contract design for a risk-averse commodity broker in a two-echelon supply chain," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 307(1), pages 111-138, December.
    13. Seyed Hossein Razavi Hajiagha & Hannan Amoozad Mahdiraji & Maryam Behnam & Boshra Nekoughadirli & Rohit Joshi, 2022. "A scenario-based robust time–cost tradeoff model to handle the effect of COVID-19 on supply chains project management," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 357-377, June.
    14. Seyedmohsen Hosseini & Dmitry Ivanov, 2022. "A new resilience measure for supply networks with the ripple effect considerations: a Bayesian network approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 581-607, December.
    15. Manu Sharma & Sudhanshu Joshi & Sunil Luthra & Anil Kumar, 2022. "Managing disruptions and risks amidst COVID-19 outbreaks: role of blockchain technology in developing resilient food supply chains," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 268-281, June.
    16. Paul-Eric Dossou & Esther Alvarez-de-los-Mozos & Pawel Pawlewski, 2024. "A Conceptual Framework for Optimizing Performance in Sustainable Supply Chain Management and Digital Transformation towards Industry 5.0," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-31, September.
    17. Li, Yuhong & Zobel, Christopher W. & Seref, Onur & Chatfield, Dean, 2020. "Network characteristics and supply chain resilience under conditions of risk propagation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    18. Rayenda K. Brahmana & Hui‐Wei You & Evan Lau, 2022. "Does reputation matter for firm risk in developing country?," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(2), pages 2110-2123, April.
    19. Shi, Xiaoqiu & Long, Wei & Li, Yanyan & Deng, Dingshan, 2022. "Robustness of interdependent supply chain networks against both functional and structural cascading failures," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 586(C).
    20. Yılmaz, Ömer Faruk & Yeni, Fatma Betül & Gürsoy Yılmaz, Beren & Özçelik, Gökhan, 2023. "An optimization-based methodology equipped with lean tools to strengthen medical supply chain resilience during a pandemic: A case study from Turkey," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0245187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.