IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0242999.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Associations between objectively-measured and self-reported neighbourhood walkability on adherence and steps during an internet-delivered pedometer intervention

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Consoli
  • Alberto Nettel-Aguirre
  • John C Spence
  • Tara-Leigh McHugh
  • Kerry Mummery
  • Gavin R McCormack

Abstract

Background: Accumulating evidence suggests that the built environment is associated with physical activity. The extent to which the built environment may support adherence to physical activity interventions is unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the neighbourhood built environment constrains or facilitates adherence and steps taken during a 12-week internet-delivered pedometer-based physical activity intervention (UWALK). Method: The study was undertaken in Calgary (Canada) between May 2016 and August 2017. Inactive adults (n = 573) completed a telephone survey measuring sociodemographic characteristics and perceived neighbourhood walkability. Following the survey, participants were mailed a pedometer and instructions for joining UWALK. Participants were asked to report their daily pedometer steps into the online program on a weekly basis for 12 weeks (84 days). Walk Score® estimated objective neighbourhood walkability and the Neighbourhood Environment Walkability Scale–Abbreviated (NEWS-A) measured participants self-reported neighbourhood walkability. Regression models estimated covariate-adjusted associations of objective and self-reported walkability with: 1) adherence to the UWALK intervention (count of days with steps reported and count of days with 10000 steps reported), and; 2) average daily pedometer steps. Results: On average, participants undertook 8565 (SD = 3030) steps per day, reported steps on 67 (SD = 22.3) of the 84 days, and achieved ≥10000 steps on 22 (SD = 20.5) of the 84 days. Adjusting for covariates, a one-unit increase in self-reported walkability was associated on average with 45.76 (95CI 14.91, 76.61) more daily pedometer steps. Walk Score® was not significantly associated with steps. Neither objective nor self-reported walkability were significantly associated with the UWALK adherence outcomes. Conclusion: The neighbourhood built environment may support pedometer-measured physical activity but may not influence adherence to pedometer interventions. Perceived walkability may be more important than objectively-measured walkability in supporting physical activity during pedometer interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Consoli & Alberto Nettel-Aguirre & John C Spence & Tara-Leigh McHugh & Kerry Mummery & Gavin R McCormack, 2020. "Associations between objectively-measured and self-reported neighbourhood walkability on adherence and steps during an internet-delivered pedometer intervention," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(12), pages 1-16, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0242999
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242999
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0242999
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0242999&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0242999?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Siegel, P.Z. & Brackbill, R.M. & Heath, G.W., 1995. "The epidemiology of walking for exercise: Implications for promoting activity among sedentary groups," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 85(5), pages 706-710.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rodrigue, Lancelot & El-Geneidy, Ahmed & Manaugh, Kevin, 2024. "Sociodemographic matters: Analyzing interactions of individuals' characteristics with walkability when modelling walking behavior," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrea Rebecchi & Maddalena Buffoli & Marco Dettori & Letizia Appolloni & Antonio Azara & Paolo Castiglia & Daniela D’Alessandro & Stefano Capolongo, 2019. "Walkable Environments and Healthy Urban Moves: Urban Context Features Assessment Framework Experienced in Milan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Xavier Delclòs-Alió & Oriol Marquet & Guillem Vich & Jasper Schipperijn & Kai Zhang & Monika Maciejewska & Carme Miralles-Guasch, 2019. "Temperature and Rain Moderate the Effect of Neighborhood Walkability on Walking Time for Seniors in Barcelona," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Ophelia Amo & Wisdom Akpalu & Daniel K. Twerefou & Godfred A. Bokpin, 2022. "Estimating the Economic Value of Health Walk on the Accra-Aburi Mountains Walkway in Ghana: An Individual Travel Cost Approach," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 9(1), pages 75-85, January.
    4. Laura Pagani & Demetrio Panarello, 2022. "Evaluation of a program for promoting physical activity and well-being: Friuli Venezia Giulia in Movimento," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 80(1), pages 97-120, April.
    5. Moniruzzaman, Md & Páez, Antonio, 2016. "An investigation of the attributes of walkable environments from the perspective of seniors in Montreal," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 85-96.
    6. Veerle Van Holle & Jelle Van Cauwenberg & Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij & Benedicte Deforche & Nico Van de Weghe & Delfien Van Dyck, 2016. "Interactions between Neighborhood Social Environment and Walkability to Explain Belgian Older Adults’ Physical Activity and Sedentary Time," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-14, June.
    7. K. Meghan Wieters, 2016. "Advantages of Online Methods in Planning Research," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(3), pages 21582440166, July.
    8. Alice Avancini & Valeria Pala & Ilaria Trestini & Daniela Tregnago & Luigi Mariani & Sabina Sieri & Vittorio Krogh & Marco Boresta & Michele Milella & Sara Pilotto & Massimo Lanza, 2020. "Exercise Levels and Preferences in Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-22, July.
    9. Tanja Congiu & Giovanni Sotgiu & Paolo Castiglia & Antonio Azara & Andrea Piana & Laura Saderi & Marco Dettori, 2019. "Built Environment Features and Pedestrian Accidents: An Italian Retrospective Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-14, February.
    10. Maria Fiore & Antonio Cristaldi & Valeriya Okatyeva & Salvatore Lo Bianco & Gea Oliveri Conti & Pietro Zuccarello & Chiara Copat & Rosario Caltabiano & Matteo Cannizzaro & Margherita Ferrante, 2019. "Physical Activity and Thyroid Cancer Risk: A Case-Control Study in Catania (South Italy)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-8, April.
    11. Darker, Catherine D. & Larkin, Michael & French, David P., 2007. "An exploration of walking behaviour--An interpretative phenomenological approach," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(10), pages 2172-2183, November.
    12. Gera E. Nagelhout & Lette Hogeling & Renate Spruijt & Nathalie Postma & Hein De Vries, 2017. "Barriers and Facilitators for Health Behavior Change among Adults from Multi-Problem Households: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-17, October.
    13. Longo, Alberto & Hutchinson, W. George & Hunter, Ruth F. & Tully, Mark A. & Kee, Frank, 2015. "Demand response to improved walking infrastructure: A study into the economics of walking and health behaviour change," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 107-116.
    14. Obradovich, Nicholas & Fowler, James H., 2017. "Climate change may alter human physical activity patterns," Scholarly Articles 36874928, Harvard Kennedy School of Government.
    15. Dharmambigai Prithviraj & Lakshmi Sundaram, 2023. "Exploring the Walkability of Senior Citizens in a Densely Populated Neighborhood of Chennai, India—A Structural Equation Modeling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-17, September.
    16. Marie Plessz & Sehar Ezdi & Guillaume Airagnes & Isabelle Parizot & Céline Ribet & Marcel Goldberg & Marie Zins & Pierre Meneton, 2020. "Association between unemployment and the co-occurrence and clustering of common risky health behaviors: Findings from the Constances cohort," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-15, May.
    17. Yi Zhang & Yuan Li & Qixing Liu & Chaoyang Li, 2014. "The Built Environment and Walking Activity of the Elderly: An Empirical Analysis in the Zhongshan Metropolitan Area, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-17, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0242999. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.