IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i15p5351-d389519.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exercise Levels and Preferences in Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study

Author

Listed:
  • Alice Avancini

    (Department of Medicine, Biomedical, Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy)

  • Valeria Pala

    (Department of Research, Epidemiology and Prevention Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy)

  • Ilaria Trestini

    (Medical Oncology Unit, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, 37134 Verona, Italy)

  • Daniela Tregnago

    (Medical Oncology Unit, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, 37134 Verona, Italy)

  • Luigi Mariani

    (Department of Medical Statistics, Biometry and Bioinformatics, Unit of Clinical Epidemiology and Trial Organization, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy)

  • Sabina Sieri

    (Department of Research, Epidemiology and Prevention Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy)

  • Vittorio Krogh

    (Department of Research, Epidemiology and Prevention Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy)

  • Marco Boresta

    (Department of Computer, Control and Management Engineering Antonio Ruberti, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy)

  • Michele Milella

    (Medical Oncology Unit, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, 37134 Verona, Italy)

  • Sara Pilotto

    (Medical Oncology Unit, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, 37134 Verona, Italy)

  • Massimo Lanza

    (Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy)

Abstract

Background: Despite the benefits related to physical exercise, large numbers of cancer patients are not sufficiently active. Methods: To investigate exercise levels and preferences in cancer patients, a cross-sectional study was conducted on a random sample of 392 cancer outpatients who anonymously completed a questionnaire investigating general and medical characteristics, and expressed willingness to participate in exercise programs. Current exercise levels were estimated with the Leisure Score Index (LSI). Results: Most patients (93%) were insufficiently active but 80% declared an interest in exercise programs. Patients preferred oncologist-instructed programs and specified particular exercise needs. Multivariate logistic regression showed that willingness to exercise was associated with education (OR: 1.87; 95% CI: 1.15–3.04 beyond age 14 years vs. up to 14 years) and current physical activity (OR: 1.92; 95% CI: 1.92–3.63 for sweat-inducing activity >2 times/week vs. <1 time/week). Patients given chemotherapy were less inclined to exercise (OR: 0.45; 95% CI: 0.23–0.86) than those who did not. LSI was lower if cancer stage was advanced (β: -0.36; 95% CI: −0.75 to −0.02) than if it was in remission. High LSI was also associated with longer education, lower BMI, and longer time after diagnosis. Conclusion: Cancer patients are insufficiently active but are willing to participate in personalized exercise programs. Information from this survey may help in designing personalized interventions so these patients will achieve sufficient exercise.

Suggested Citation

  • Alice Avancini & Valeria Pala & Ilaria Trestini & Daniela Tregnago & Luigi Mariani & Sabina Sieri & Vittorio Krogh & Marco Boresta & Michele Milella & Sara Pilotto & Massimo Lanza, 2020. "Exercise Levels and Preferences in Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-22, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:15:p:5351-:d:389519
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/15/5351/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/15/5351/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Siegel, P.Z. & Brackbill, R.M. & Heath, G.W., 1995. "The epidemiology of walking for exercise: Implications for promoting activity among sedentary groups," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 85(5), pages 706-710.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna Lewandowska & Grzegorz Rudzki & Tomasz Lewandowski & Sławomir Rudzki, 2020. "The Problems and Needs of Patients Diagnosed with Cancer and Their Caregivers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Muluken Azage & Serkalem Zewudie & Martha H. Goedert & Engda G. Hagos, 2023. "Epidemiological Characteristics of Cancer Patients Attending at Felege Hiwot Referral Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-13, March.
    3. Alice Avancini & Carlo Ferri Marini & Isabella Sperduti & Valentina Natalucci & Anita Borsati & Sara Pilotto & Claudia Cerulli & Elena Barbieri & Francesco Lucertini & Massimo Lanza & Attilio Parisi &, 2022. "Kinesiology Students’ Perception Regarding Exercise Oncology: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-10, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrea Rebecchi & Maddalena Buffoli & Marco Dettori & Letizia Appolloni & Antonio Azara & Paolo Castiglia & Daniela D’Alessandro & Stefano Capolongo, 2019. "Walkable Environments and Healthy Urban Moves: Urban Context Features Assessment Framework Experienced in Milan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Xavier Delclòs-Alió & Oriol Marquet & Guillem Vich & Jasper Schipperijn & Kai Zhang & Monika Maciejewska & Carme Miralles-Guasch, 2019. "Temperature and Rain Moderate the Effect of Neighborhood Walkability on Walking Time for Seniors in Barcelona," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Ophelia Amo & Wisdom Akpalu & Daniel K. Twerefou & Godfred A. Bokpin, 2022. "Estimating the Economic Value of Health Walk on the Accra-Aburi Mountains Walkway in Ghana: An Individual Travel Cost Approach," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 9(1), pages 75-85, January.
    4. Laura Pagani & Demetrio Panarello, 2022. "Evaluation of a program for promoting physical activity and well-being: Friuli Venezia Giulia in Movimento," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 80(1), pages 97-120, April.
    5. Moniruzzaman, Md & Páez, Antonio, 2016. "An investigation of the attributes of walkable environments from the perspective of seniors in Montreal," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 85-96.
    6. Veerle Van Holle & Jelle Van Cauwenberg & Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij & Benedicte Deforche & Nico Van de Weghe & Delfien Van Dyck, 2016. "Interactions between Neighborhood Social Environment and Walkability to Explain Belgian Older Adults’ Physical Activity and Sedentary Time," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-14, June.
    7. K. Meghan Wieters, 2016. "Advantages of Online Methods in Planning Research," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(3), pages 21582440166, July.
    8. Tanja Congiu & Giovanni Sotgiu & Paolo Castiglia & Antonio Azara & Andrea Piana & Laura Saderi & Marco Dettori, 2019. "Built Environment Features and Pedestrian Accidents: An Italian Retrospective Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-14, February.
    9. Maria Fiore & Antonio Cristaldi & Valeriya Okatyeva & Salvatore Lo Bianco & Gea Oliveri Conti & Pietro Zuccarello & Chiara Copat & Rosario Caltabiano & Matteo Cannizzaro & Margherita Ferrante, 2019. "Physical Activity and Thyroid Cancer Risk: A Case-Control Study in Catania (South Italy)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-8, April.
    10. Darker, Catherine D. & Larkin, Michael & French, David P., 2007. "An exploration of walking behaviour--An interpretative phenomenological approach," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(10), pages 2172-2183, November.
    11. Gera E. Nagelhout & Lette Hogeling & Renate Spruijt & Nathalie Postma & Hein De Vries, 2017. "Barriers and Facilitators for Health Behavior Change among Adults from Multi-Problem Households: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-17, October.
    12. Longo, Alberto & Hutchinson, W. George & Hunter, Ruth F. & Tully, Mark A. & Kee, Frank, 2015. "Demand response to improved walking infrastructure: A study into the economics of walking and health behaviour change," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 107-116.
    13. Obradovich, Nicholas & Fowler, James H., 2017. "Climate change may alter human physical activity patterns," Scholarly Articles 36874928, Harvard Kennedy School of Government.
    14. Dharmambigai Prithviraj & Lakshmi Sundaram, 2023. "Exploring the Walkability of Senior Citizens in a Densely Populated Neighborhood of Chennai, India—A Structural Equation Modeling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-17, September.
    15. Marie Plessz & Sehar Ezdi & Guillaume Airagnes & Isabelle Parizot & Céline Ribet & Marcel Goldberg & Marie Zins & Pierre Meneton, 2020. "Association between unemployment and the co-occurrence and clustering of common risky health behaviors: Findings from the Constances cohort," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-15, May.
    16. Yi Zhang & Yuan Li & Qixing Liu & Chaoyang Li, 2014. "The Built Environment and Walking Activity of the Elderly: An Empirical Analysis in the Zhongshan Metropolitan Area, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-17, February.
    17. Anna Consoli & Alberto Nettel-Aguirre & John C Spence & Tara-Leigh McHugh & Kerry Mummery & Gavin R McCormack, 2020. "Associations between objectively-measured and self-reported neighbourhood walkability on adherence and steps during an internet-delivered pedometer intervention," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(12), pages 1-16, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:15:p:5351-:d:389519. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.