IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0241259.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A national cross-sectional survey of public perceptions of the COVID-19 pandemic: Self-reported beliefs, knowledge, and behaviors

Author

Listed:
  • Jeanna Parsons Leigh
  • Kirsten Fiest
  • Rebecca Brundin-Mather
  • Kara Plotnikoff
  • Andrea Soo
  • Emma E Sypes
  • Liam Whalen-Browne
  • Sofia B Ahmed
  • Karen E A Burns
  • Alison Fox-Robichaud
  • Shelly Kupsch
  • Shelly Longmore
  • Srinivas Murthy
  • Daniel J Niven
  • Bram Rochwerg
  • Henry T Stelfox

Abstract

Introduction: Efforts to mitigate the global spread of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) causing Corona Virus Disease-19 (COVID-19) have largely relied on broad compliance with public health recommendations yet navigating the high volume of evolving information can be challenging. We assessed self-reported public perceptions related to COVID-19 including, beliefs (e.g., severity, concerns, health), knowledge (e.g., transmission, information sources), and behaviors (e.g., physical distancing) to understand perspectives in Canada and to inform future public health initiatives. Methods: We administered a national online survey aiming to obtain responses from 2000 adults in Canada. Respondent sampling was stratified by age, sex, and region. We used descriptive statistics to summarize responses and tested for regional differences using chi-squared tests, followed by weighted logistic regression. Results: We collected 1,996 eligible questionnaires between April 26th and May 1st, 2020. One-fifth (20%) of respondents knew someone diagnosed with COVID-19, but few had tested positive themselves (0.6%). Negative impacts of pandemic conditions were evidenced in several areas, including concerns about healthcare (e.g. sufficient equipment, 52%), pandemic stress (45%), and worsening social (49%) and mental/emotional (39%) health. Most respondents (88%) felt they had good to excellent knowledge of virus transmission, and predominantly accessed (74%) and trusted (60%) Canadian news television, newspapers/magazines, or non-government news websites for COVID-19 information. We found high compliance with distancing measures (80% reported self-isolating or always physical distancing). We identified associations between region and self-reported beliefs, knowledge, and behaviors related to COVID-19. Discussion: We found that information about COVID-19 is largely acquired through domestic news sources, which may explain high self-reported compliance with prevention measures. The results highlight the broader impact of a pandemic on the general public’s overall health and wellbeing, outside of personal infection. The study findings should be used to inform public health communications during COVID-19 and future pandemics.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeanna Parsons Leigh & Kirsten Fiest & Rebecca Brundin-Mather & Kara Plotnikoff & Andrea Soo & Emma E Sypes & Liam Whalen-Browne & Sofia B Ahmed & Karen E A Burns & Alison Fox-Robichaud & Shelly Kupsc, 2020. "A national cross-sectional survey of public perceptions of the COVID-19 pandemic: Self-reported beliefs, knowledge, and behaviors," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-18, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0241259
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241259
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0241259
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0241259&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0241259?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lumley, Thomas, 2004. "Analysis of Complex Survey Samples," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 9(i08).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maciej Berk{e}sewicz & Herman Cherniaiev & Robert Pater, 2021. "Estimating the number of entities with vacancies using administrative and online data," Papers 2106.03263, arXiv.org.
    2. J. Michael Brick & Michael E. Jones, 2008. "Propensity to respond and nonresponse bias," Metron - International Journal of Statistics, Dipartimento di Statistica, Probabilità e Statistiche Applicate - University of Rome, vol. 0(1), pages 51-73.
    3. Jacques Muthusi & Samuel Mwalili & Peter Young, 2019. "%svy_logistic_regression: A generic SAS macro for simple and multiple logistic regression and creating quality publication-ready tables using survey or non-survey data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-14, September.
    4. Urdinola, Piedad & Bejarano, Valeria & Espinosa, Oscar & Do Nascimento Silva, Pedro Luis, 2024. "Estudio de caracterización socioeconómica y demográficade los afiliados al régimen subsidiado de salud, Colombia 2019-2020," Ensayos de Economía 21227, Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Medellín.
    5. Jonathan Wakefield & Taylor Okonek & Jon Pedersen, 2020. "Small Area Estimation for Disease Prevalence Mapping," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 88(2), pages 398-418, August.
    6. Fenton, Alex, 2013. "Small-area measures of income poverty," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 58053, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. repec:cep:sticas:/173 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Miranda R Jones & Maria Tellez-Plaza & Ana Navas-Acien, 2013. "Smoking, Menthol Cigarettes and All-Cause, Cancer and Cardiovascular Mortality: Evidence from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and a Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(10), pages 1-1, October.
    9. Mei‐Chih Meg Tseng & Yi‐Ping Lin & Fu‐Chang Hu & Tsun‐Jen Cheng, 2013. "Risks Perception of Electromagnetic Fields in Taiwan: The Influence of Psychopathology and the Degree of Sensitivity to Electromagnetic Fields," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(11), pages 2002-2012, November.
    10. Raphael Nishimura & James Wagner & Michael Elliott, 2016. "Alternative Indicators for the Risk of Non-response Bias: A Simulation Study," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 84(1), pages 43-62, April.
    11. Roque Miramontes & Andrew N Hill & Rachel S Yelk Woodruff & Lauren A Lambert & Thomas R Navin & Kenneth G Castro & Philip A LoBue, 2015. "Tuberculosis Infection in the United States: Prevalence Estimates from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2011-2012," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, November.
    12. Camelia Herman & Colleen M. Leonard & Perpetua Uhomoibhi & Mark Maire & Delynn Moss & Uwem Inyang & Ado Abubakar & Abiodun Ogunniyi & Nwando Mba & Stacie M. Greby & McPaul I. Okoye & Nnaemeka C. Iriem, 2023. "Non-falciparum malaria infection and IgG seroprevalence among children under 15 years in Nigeria, 2018," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    13. Elijah O. Onsomu & DaKysha Moore & Benta A. Abuya & Peggy Valentine & Vanessa Duren-Winfield, 2013. "Importance of the Media in Scaling-Up HIV Testing in Kenya," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(3), pages 21582440134, July.
    14. Vinas-Forcade, Jennifer & Seijas, María Noé, 2021. "To teach or not to teach: Negative selection into the teaching profession in Uruguay," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    15. Zhongqi Fan & Amy M. Yang & Marcus Lehr & Ana B. Ronan & Ryan B. Simpson & Kimberly H. Nguyen & Elena N. Naumova & Naglaa H. El-Abbadi, 2024. "Food Insecurity across Age Groups in the United States during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(8), pages 1-19, August.
    16. Lenis, David & Ackerman, Benjamin & Stuart, Elizabeth A., 2018. "Measuring model misspecification: Application to propensity score methods with complex survey data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 48-57.
    17. Sofia Gil-Clavel & Emilio Zagheni & Valeria Bordone, 2022. "Close Social Networks Among Older Adults: The Online and Offline Perspectives," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 41(3), pages 1111-1135, June.
    18. Matthew R. Williams & Terrance D. Savitsky, 2021. "Uncertainty Estimation for Pseudo‐Bayesian Inference Under Complex Sampling," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 89(1), pages 72-107, April.
    19. Wang, Jianqiang C., 2012. "Sample distribution function based goodness-of-fit test for complex surveys," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(3), pages 664-679.
    20. Liu, Chia & Olamijuwon, Emmanuel, 2024. "The link between intimate partner violence and spousal resource inequality in lower- and middle-income countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 345(C).
    21. Alejandro Aybar-Flores & Alvaro Talavera & Elizabeth Espinoza-Portilla, 2023. "Predicting the HIV/AIDS Knowledge among the Adolescent and Young Adult Population in Peru: Application of Quasi-Binomial Logistic Regression and Machine Learning Algorithms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(7), pages 1-29, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0241259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.