IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0234108.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Electronic Medical Records implementation in hospital: An empirical investigation of individual and organizational determinants

Author

Listed:
  • Anna De Benedictis
  • Emanuele Lettieri
  • Luca Gastaldi
  • Cristina Masella
  • Alessia Urgu
  • Daniela Tartaglini

Abstract

The implementation of hospital-wide Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) is still an unsolved quest for many hospital managers. EMRs have long been considered a key factor for improving healthcare quality and safety, reducing adverse events for patients, decreasing costs, optimizing processes, improving clinical research and obtaining best clinical performances. However, hospitals continue to experience resistance from professionals to accepting EMRs. This study combines institutional and individual factors to explain which determinants can trigger or inhibit the EMRs implementation in hospitals, and which variables managers can exploit to guide professionals’ behaviours. Data have been collected through a survey administered to physicians and nurses in an Italian University Hospital in Rome. A total of 114 high-quality responses had been received. Results show that both, physicians and nurses, expect many benefits from the use of EMRs. In particular, it is believed that the EMRs will have a positive impact on quality, efficiency and effectiveness of care; handover communication between healthcare workers; teaching, tutoring and research activities; greater control of your own business. Moreover, data show an interplay between individual and institutional determinants: normative factors directly affect perceived usefulness (C = 0.30 **), perceived ease of use (C = 0.26 **) and intention to use EMRs (C = 0.33 **), regulative factors affect the intention to use EMRs (C = -0.21 **), and perceived usefulness directly affect the intention to use EMRs (C = 0.33 **). The analysis carried out shows that the key determinants of the intention to use EMRs are the normative ones (peer influence) and the individual ones (perceived usefulness), and that perceived usefulness works also as a mediator between normative factors and intention to use EMRs. Therefore, Management can leverage on power users to motivate, generate and manage change.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna De Benedictis & Emanuele Lettieri & Luca Gastaldi & Cristina Masella & Alessia Urgu & Daniela Tartaglini, 2020. "Electronic Medical Records implementation in hospital: An empirical investigation of individual and organizational determinants," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-12, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0234108
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0234108
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0234108&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0234108?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. W. Richard Scott, 2003. "Institutional carriers: reviewing modes of transporting ideas over time and space and considering their consequences," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 12(4), pages 879-894, August.
    2. Viswanath Venkatesh & Xiaojun Zhang & Tracy A. Sykes, 2011. "“Doctors Do Too Little Technology”: A Longitudinal Field Study of an Electronic Healthcare System Implementation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 523-546, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ed Cook & Jason R. W. Merrick, 2023. "Technology Implementation at Capital One," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 53(3), pages 178-191, May.
    2. Matthias Garschagen, 2013. "Resilience and organisational institutionalism from a cross-cultural perspective: an exploration based on urban climate change adaptation in Vietnam," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 67(1), pages 25-46, May.
    3. Bammens, Yannick & Hünermund, Paul, 2023. "Ecological community logics, identifiable business ownership, and green innovation as a company response," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(8).
    4. Soh Hyun Chu & Hongsuk Yang & Mansokku Lee & Sangwook Park, 2017. "The Impact of Institutional Pressures on Green Supply Chain Management and Firm Performance: Top Management Roles and Social Capital," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-21, May.
    5. Marika Arena & Kim Klarskov Jeppesen, 2016. "Practice Variation in Public Sector Internal Auditing: An Institutional Analysis," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 319-345, June.
    6. Pant, Laxmi Prasad, 2016. "Paradox of mainstreaming agroecology for regional and rural food security in developing countries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 305-316.
    7. Schøtt, Thomas & Jensen, Kent Wickstrøm, 2016. "Firms’ innovation benefiting from networking and institutional support: A global analysis of national and firm effects," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(6), pages 1233-1246.
    8. Anna De Benedictis & Emanuele Lettieri & Michela Piredda & Raffaella Gualandi & Maddalena De Maria & Daniela Tartaglini, 2021. "Development and psychometric testing of a new measure of the determinants that influence the adoption of WhatsApp in hospitals," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(12), pages 1-14, December.
    9. Francesco D. Sandulli & Paul M.A. Baker & José I. López-Sánchez, 2014. "Jobs mismatch and productivity impact of information technology," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(13), pages 1060-1074, September.
    10. Khaldoon Al†Htaybat, 2018. "IFRS Adoption in Emerging Markets: The Case of Jordan," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 28(1), pages 28-47, March.
    11. Stephanie Lu Wang & Yejee Lee & Dan Li, 2024. "Smart disclosure: an enabler for multinationals to reduce human rights violations in global supply chains," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 55(4), pages 450-469, June.
    12. Abi Saad, Elie & Tremblay, Nathalie & Agogué, Marine, 2024. "A multi-level perspective on innovation intermediaries: The case of the diffusion of digital technologies in healthcare," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    13. Chakraborty, Imon & Ilavarasan, P. Vigneswara & Edirippulige, Sisira, 2021. "Health-tech startups in healthcare service delivery: A scoping review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    14. Ni Huang & Zhijun Yan & Haonan Yin, 2021. "Effects of Online–Offline Service Integration on e‐Healthcare Providers: A Quasi‐Natural Experiment," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(8), pages 2359-2378, August.
    15. Yee-Loong Chong, Alain & Liu, Martin J. & Luo, Jun & Keng-Boon, Ooi, 2015. "Predicting RFID adoption in healthcare supply chain from the perspectives of users," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 66-75.
    16. Khatua, Apalak & Ranjan Kumar, Rajeev & Kumar De, Supriya, 2023. "Institutional enablers of electric vehicle market: Evidence from 30 countries," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    17. Gang Peng & Debabrata Dey, 2013. "Research Note ---A Dynamic View of the Impact of Network Structure on Technology Adoption: The Case of OSS Development," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 1087-1099, December.
    18. Magdalena Biel & Katarzyna Grondys & Ane-Mari Androniceanu, 2022. "A Crisis in the Health System and Quality of Healthcare in Economically Developed Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-21, December.
    19. Zhao, Yang & Canales, J. Ignacio, 2021. "Never the twain shall meet? Knowledge strategies for digitalization in healthcare," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    20. Lorenz Graf-Vlachy & Katharina Buhtz & Andreas König, 2018. "Social influence in technology adoption: taking stock and moving forward," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 68(1), pages 37-76, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0234108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.