IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0233472.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Work-related psychosocial risk factors and psychiatric disorders: A cross-sectional study in the French working population

Author

Listed:
  • Astrid M Chevance
  • Oumou S Daouda
  • Alexandre Salvador
  • Patrick Légeron
  • Yannick Morvan
  • Gilbert Saporta
  • Mounia N Hocine
  • Raphaël Gaillard

Abstract

Purpose: The study estimates the prevalence of probable psychiatric disorder in the working population, determines the proportion of people presenting a probable psychiatric disorder among people exposed to work-related psychosocial risk factors (PSRFs), and identifies which PSRF has the strongest association with having a probable psychiatric disorder. Methods: A cross-sectional study conducted in March 2018 involved a representative sample of the French working population. The General Health Questionnaire 28 (GHQ-28) was used to estimate the prevalence of probable psychiatric disorder and 44 items were gathered from theoretical models of PSRFs. We used multiple logistic regression to estimate the association of each PSRF with having a probable psychiatric disorder, adjusted on individual, health, and job confounders. Results: This study involved 3200 French participants. The proportion of probable psychiatric disorder was 22.2% [20.6; 24.0]. Ten PSRFs were significantly associated with it. The strongest association was for having problems handling professional and personal responsibilities (reported by 15% of the study population) (OR = 1.97 [1.52; 2.54]), with 45% pathological GHQ-28 scores (potential psychiatric cases) for people exposed to this PSRF versus 18% non-exposed. The next strongest association was lack of support of colleagues (reported by 28%) (OR = 1.63 [1.29; 2.06]). The third strongest association was feeling sometimes afraid when doing the job (reported by 63%) (OR = 1.53, [1.21; 1.93]). Conclusions: Our study identified 10 PSRFs associated with psychiatric disorder, with substantial exposure rate among the population. The results of our research could help develop recommendations to improve work environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Astrid M Chevance & Oumou S Daouda & Alexandre Salvador & Patrick Légeron & Yannick Morvan & Gilbert Saporta & Mounia N Hocine & Raphaël Gaillard, 2020. "Work-related psychosocial risk factors and psychiatric disorders: A cross-sectional study in the French working population," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-14, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0233472
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233472
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0233472
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0233472&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0233472?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oshio, Takashi & Inoue, Akiomi & Tsutsumi, Akizumi, 2017. "Does work-to-family conflict really matter for health? Cross-sectional, prospective cohort and fixed-effects analyses," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 36-42.
    2. Oliver Hämmig & Georg Bauer, 2009. "Work-life imbalance and mental health among male and female employees in Switzerland," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 54(2), pages 88-95, April.
    3. Mounia N Hocine & Karim Aït Bouziad & Patrick Légeron & William Dab & Gilbert Saporta, 2016. "How to Identify and Prioritize Psychosocial Factors Impacting Stress Level," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-11, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adam Hege & Michael K. Lemke & Yorghos Apostolopoulos & Brian Whitaker & Sevil Sönmez, 2019. "Work-Life Conflict among U.S. Long-Haul Truck Drivers: Influences of Work Organization, Perceived Job Stress, Sleep, and Organizational Support," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Masood Badri & Mugheer Al Khaili & Guang Yang & Muna Al Bahar & Asma Al Rashdi, 2022. "Examining the Structural Effect of Working Time on Well-Being: Evidence from Abu Dhabi," International Journal of Social Sciences, European Research Center, vol. 11(2), pages 24-44, September.
    3. Ehab Salah Eshak, 2019. "Mental Health Disorders and Their Relationship with Work-Family Conflict in Upper Egypt," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 623-632, December.
    4. Shengwei Wu & Zhengzheng Xuan & Fei Li & Wei Xiao & Xiuqiong Fu & Pingping Jiang & Jieyu Chen & Lei Xiang & Yanyan Liu & Xiaoli Nie & Ren Luo & Xiaomin Sun & Hiuyee Kwan & Xiaoshan Zhao, 2016. "Work-Recreation Balance, Health-Promoting Lifestyles and Suboptimal Health Status in Southern China: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-16, March.
    5. Vanessa Molinero de Paula & Júlia Teles & Teresa Patrone Cotrim, 2024. "Organizational and Individual Factors Influencing the Quality of Working Life Among Brazilian University Professors during COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-15, July.
    6. Chen, Ping-Kuo & Ye, Yong & Wen, Ming-Hui, 2023. "Efficiency of metaverse on the improvement of the green procurement policy of semiconductor supply chain – based on behaviour perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PA).
    7. Andrea Rørvik Marti & Eirik Degerud & Tom Sterud, 2022. "Onset of Work-Life Conflict Increases Risk of Subsequent Psychological Distress in the Norwegian Working Population," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-9, October.
    8. Cullati, Stéphane, 2014. "The influence of work-family conflict trajectories on self-rated health trajectories in Switzerland: A life course approach," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 23-33.
    9. Oshio, Takashi & Inoue, Akiomi & Tsutsumi, Akizumi, 2017. "Does work-to-family conflict really matter for health? Cross-sectional, prospective cohort and fixed-effects analyses," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 36-42.
    10. Masatsugu Orui & Yuriko Suzuki & Aya Goto & Seiji Yasumura, 2017. "Factors Associated with Maintaining the Mental Health of Employees after the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster: Findings from Companies Located in the Evacuation Area," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    11. Fabian Onyekachi Ugwu & Ibeawuchi K. Enwereuzor & Jens Mazei, 2023. "Is Working from Home a Blessing or a Burden? Home Demands as a Mediator of the Relationship Between Work Engagement and Work-Life Balance," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 18(1), pages 341-364, February.
    12. Lea-Sophie Borgmann & Petra Rattay & Thomas Lampert, 2020. "Longitudinal Analysis of Work-to-Family Conflict and Self-Reported General Health among Working Parents in Germany," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-15, June.
    13. Maryam Dilmaghani & Vurain Tabvuma, 2022. "Fragile Families in Quebec and the Rest of Canada: A Comparison of Parental Work-Life Balance Satisfaction," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 41(2), pages 695-728, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0233472. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.