IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0232326.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Association of intestinal colonization of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in poultry slaughterhouse workers with occupational exposure—A German pilot study

Author

Listed:
  • Katharina Wadepohl
  • Anja Müller
  • Diana Seinige
  • Karl Rohn
  • Thomas Blaha
  • Diana Meemken
  • Corinna Kehrenberg

Abstract

Background: Bacteria that have acquired antimicrobial resistance, in particular ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae, are an important healthcare concern. Therefore, transmission routes and risk factors are of interest, especially for the carriage of ESBL-producing E. coli. Since there is an enhanced risk for pig slaughterhouse employees to carry ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae, associated with animal contact as potential risk factor, the present study investigated the occurrence of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in poultry slaughterhouse employees. Due to the higher level of resistant Enterobacteriaceae in primary poultry production than in pig production, a higher risk of intestinal colonization of poultry slaughterhouse employees was expected. Results: ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae were detected in 5.1% (5 of 99) of the fecal samples of slaughterhouse workers. The species of these isolates was confirmed as E. coli. PCR assays revealed the presence of the genes blaCTX-M-15 (n = 2) and blaSHV-12 (n = 3) in these isolates, partly in combination with the β-lactamase gene blaTEM-135. Participants were divided into two groups according to their occupational exposure and results indicated an increased probability of colonization with ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae for the group of ‘higher exposure’ (OR 3.7, exact 95% CI 0.6–23.5; p = 0.4). For intestinal colonization with ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae, a prevalence of 10% (3/30) was observed in the group of ‘higher exposure’ versus 2.9% (2/69) in the group of ‘lower exposure’. Employees in working steps such as ‘hanging’ poultry in the process of slaughter and ‘evisceration’ seemed to have a higher risk for intestinal colonization with ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae compared to the group of ‘lower exposure’. Conclusion: This study is the first of its kind to collect data on the occupational exposure of slaughterhouse workers to ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Europe. The results suggested that colonization with ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae is associated with occupational exposure in poultry slaughterhouses. However, the presence of ESBL-producing E. coli isolates in only 5.1% (5/99) of the tested employees in poultry slaughterhouses suggests a lower transmission risk than in pig slaughterhouses.

Suggested Citation

  • Katharina Wadepohl & Anja Müller & Diana Seinige & Karl Rohn & Thomas Blaha & Diana Meemken & Corinna Kehrenberg, 2020. "Association of intestinal colonization of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in poultry slaughterhouse workers with occupational exposure—A German pilot study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-12, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0232326
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232326
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0232326
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0232326&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0232326?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Haitske Graveland & Jaap A Wagenaar & Hans Heesterbeek & Dik Mevius & Engeline van Duijkeren & Dick Heederik, 2010. "Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 in Veal Calf Farming: Human MRSA Carriage Related with Animal Antimicrobial Usage and Farm Hygiene," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(6), pages 1-6, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alessio Facciolà & Antonino Virga & Maria Eufemia Gioffrè & Pasqualina Laganà, 2021. "Evaluation of Antibiotic Resistance in Bacterial Strains Isolated from Sewage of Slaughterhouses Located in Sicily (Italy)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-14, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hsin-Wei Fang & Po-Hsing Chiang & Yhu-Chering Huang, 2014. "Livestock-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST9 in Pigs and Related Personnel in Taiwan," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-7, February.
    2. Ana Morcillo & Beatriz Castro & Cristobalina Rodríguez-Alvarez & Rossana Abreu & Armando Aguirre-Jaime & Angeles Arias, 2015. "Descriptive Analysis of Antibiotic-Resistant Patterns of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) st398 Isolated from Healthy Swine," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, January.
    3. Brigitte A G L van Cleef & Birgit H B van Benthem & Erwin J M Verkade & Miranda M L van Rijen & Marjolein F Q Kluytmans-van den Bergh & Haitske Graveland & Thijs Bosch & Koen M H W Verstappen & Jaap A, 2015. "Livestock-Associated MRSA in Household Members of Pig Farmers: Transmission and Dynamics of Carriage, A Prospective Cohort Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-13, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0232326. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.