IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0219399.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk-period-cohort approach for averting identification problems in longitudinal models

Author

Listed:
  • Douglas D Gunzler
  • Adam T Perzynski
  • Neal V Dawson
  • Kelley Kauffman
  • Jintao Liu
  • Jarrod E Dalton

Abstract

In epidemiology, gerontology, human development and the social sciences, age-period-cohort (APC) models are used to study the variability in trajectories of change over time. A well-known issue exists in simultaneously identifying age, period and birth cohort effects, namely that the three characteristics comprise a perfectly collinear system. That is, since age = period−cohort, only two of these effects are estimable at a time.In this paper, we introduce an alternative framework for considering effects relating to age, period and birth cohort. In particular, instead of directly modeling age in the presence of period and cohort effects, we propose a risk modeling approach to characterize age-related risk (i.e., a hybrid of multiple biological and sociological influences to evaluate phenomena associated with growing older). The properties of this approach, termed risk-period-cohort (RPC), are described in this paper and studied by simulations. We show that, except for pathological circumstances where risk is uniquely determined by age, using such risk indices obviates the problem of collinearity. We also show that the size of the chronological age effect in the risk prediction model associates with the correlation between a risk index and chronological age and that the RPC approach can satisfactorily recover cohort and period effects in most cases. We illustrate the advantages of RPC compared to traditional APC analysis on 27496 individuals from NHANES survey data (2005–2016) to study the longitudinal variability in depression screening over time. Our RPC method has broad implications for examining processes of change over time in longitudinal studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Douglas D Gunzler & Adam T Perzynski & Neal V Dawson & Kelley Kauffman & Jintao Liu & Jarrod E Dalton, 2019. "Risk-period-cohort approach for averting identification problems in longitudinal models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-17, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0219399
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219399
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0219399
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0219399&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0219399?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liying Luo, 2013. "Assessing Validity and Application Scope of the Intrinsic Estimator Approach to the Age-Period-Cohort Problem," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 50(6), pages 1945-1967, December.
    2. Liying Luo, 2013. "Paradigm Shift in Age-Period-Cohort Analysis: A Response to Yang and Land, O’Brien, Held and Riebler, and Fienberg," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 50(6), pages 1985-1988, December.
    3. Andrew Bell & Kelvyn Jones, 2014. "Another 'futile quest'? A simulation study of Yang and Land's Hierarchical Age-Period-Cohort model," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 30(11), pages 333-360.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maarten J. Bijlsma & Rhian M. Daniel & Fanny Janssen & Bianca L. De Stavola, 2017. "An Assessment and Extension of the Mechanism-Based Approach to the Identification of Age-Period-Cohort Models," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 54(2), pages 721-743, April.
    2. Ethan Fosse & Christopher Winship, 2019. "Bounding Analyses of Age-Period-Cohort Effects," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 56(5), pages 1975-2004, October.
    3. Shih-Yung Su & Wen-Chung Lee, 2019. "Age-period-cohort analysis with a constant-relative-variation constraint for an apportionment of period and cohort slopes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(12), pages 1-21, December.
    4. Reither, Eric N. & Masters, Ryan K. & Yang, Yang Claire & Powers, Daniel A. & Zheng, Hui & Land, Kenneth C., 2015. "Should age-period-cohort studies return to the methodologies of the 1970s?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 356-365.
    5. Maarten J. Bijlsma & Rhian Daniel & Fanny Janssen & Bianca De Stavola, 2016. "An assessment and extension of the mechanism-based approach to the identification of age-period-cohort models," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2016-005, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    6. Patrick Denice, 2017. "Back to School: Racial and Gender Differences in Adults’ Participation in Formal Schooling, 1978–2013," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 54(3), pages 1147-1173, June.
    7. Liliya Leopold & Thomas Leopold, 2016. "Education and Health across Lives and Cohorts: A Study of Cumulative Advantage in Germany," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 835, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    8. Okoampah, Sarah, 2016. "Cohort size effects on wages, working status, and work time," Ruhr Economic Papers 629, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    9. Liying Luo & James Hodges, 2019. "The Age-Period-Cohort-Interaction Model for Describing and Investigating Inter-Cohort Deviations and Intra-Cohort Life-Course Dynamics," Papers 1906.08357, arXiv.org.
    10. Anli Jiang & Zhengxu Wang & Tony Huiquan Zhang, 2022. "Radicalizing and Conservatizing: Ageing Effects on Political Trust in Asia, 2001–2016," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 162(2), pages 665-681, July.
    11. Ryan Masters & Robert Hummer & Daniel Powers & Audrey Beck & Shih-Fan Lin & Brian Finch, 2014. "Long-Term Trends in Adult Mortality for U.S. Blacks and Whites: An Examination of Period- and Cohort-Based Changes," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 51(6), pages 2047-2073, December.
    12. Ryan K. Masters & Daniel A. Powers & Robert A. Hummer & Audrey Beck & Shih-Fan Lin & Brian Karl Finch, 2016. "Fitting Age-Period-Cohort Models Using the Intrinsic Estimator: Assumptions and Misapplications," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 53(4), pages 1253-1259, August.
    13. Haoyu Wen & Cong Xie & Lu Wang & Fang Wang & Yafeng Wang & Xiaoxue Liu & Chuanhua Yu, 2019. "Difference in Long-Term Trends in COPD Mortality between China and the U.S., 1992–2017: An Age–Period–Cohort Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-15, April.
    14. Enrique Acosta & Alain Gagnon & Nadine Ouellette & Robert R. Bourbeau & Marilia R. Nepomuceno & Alyson A. van Raalte, 2020. "The boomer penalty: excess mortality among baby boomers in Canada and the United States," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2020-003, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    15. Bent Nielsen, 2014. "Deviance analysis of age-period-cohort models," Economics Papers 2014-W03, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
    16. Thomson, Rachel M. & Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal, 2018. "Mental health and the jilted generation: Using age-period-cohort analysis to assess differential trends in young people's mental health following the Great Recession and austerity in England," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 133-143.
    17. Louis Chauvel & Martin Schröder, 2015. "Inequality between birth cohorts of the 20th century in West Germany, France and the US," LIS Working papers 628, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    18. Andrew Bell & Kelvyn Jones, 2015. "Bayesian informative priors with Yang and Land’s hierarchical age–period–cohort model," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 255-266, January.
    19. Aistov, Andrey, 2018. "Age-earnings profiles of different generations," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 50, pages 23-42.
    20. Emma Mishel & Paula England & Jessie Ford & Mónica L. Caudillo, 2018. "Increases in Sex with Same-Sex Partners Across U.S. Cohorts Born 1920-1998: A Race-Gender Intersection," Working Papers 20180014, New York University Abu Dhabi, Department of Social Science, revised Mar 2018.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0219399. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.