IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0218597.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public responses to volunteer community care: Propositions for old age and end of life

Author

Listed:
  • Alan Tapp
  • Clive Nancarrow
  • Yvette Morey
  • Stella Warren
  • Nicola Bowtell
  • Julia Verne

Abstract

Background: Funding shortages and an ageing population have increased pressures on state or insurance funded end of life care for older people. Across the world, policy debate has arisen about the potential role volunteers can play, working alongside health and social care professionals in the community to support and care for the ageing and dying. Aims: The authors examined self-reported levels of care for the elderly by the public in England, and public opinions of community volunteering concepts to care for the elderly at the end of life. In particular, claimed willingness to help and to be helped by local people was surveyed. Methods: A sample of 3,590 adults in England aged 45 or more from an online access panel responded to a questionnaire in late 2017. The survey data was weighted to be representative of the population within this age band. Key literature and formative qualitative research informed the design of the survey questionnaire, which was further refined after piloting. Results: Preferences for different models of community volunteering were elicited. There was a preference for ‘formal’ models with increased wariness of ‘informal’ features. Whilst 32% of adults said they ‘might join’ depending on whom the group helped, unsurprisingly more personal and demanding types of help significantly reduced the claimed willingness to help. Finally, willingness to help (or be helped) by local community carers or volunteers was regarded as less attractive than care being provided by personal family, close friends or indeed health and care professionals. Conclusion: Findings suggest that if community volunteering to care for elderly people at the end of life in England is to expand it may require considerable attention to the model including training for volunteers and protections for patients and volunteers as well as public education and promotion. Currently, in England, there is a clear preference for non-medical care to be delivered by close family or social care professionals, with volunteer community care regarded only as a back-up option.

Suggested Citation

  • Alan Tapp & Clive Nancarrow & Yvette Morey & Stella Warren & Nicola Bowtell & Julia Verne, 2019. "Public responses to volunteer community care: Propositions for old age and end of life," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-17, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0218597
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218597
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0218597
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0218597&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0218597?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christian Blickem & Shoba Dawson & Susan Kirk & Ivaylo Vassilev & Amy Mathieson & Rebecca Harrison & Peter Bower & Jonathan Lamb, 2018. "What is Asset-Based Community Development and How Might It Improve the Health of People With Long-Term Conditions? A Realist Synthesis," SAGE Open, , vol. 8(3), pages 21582440187, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rebecca Harrison & Christian Blickem & Jonathan Lamb & Susan Kirk & Ivaylo Vassilev, 2019. "Asset-Based Community Development: Narratives, Practice, and Conditions of Possibility—A Qualitative Study With Community Practitioners," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(1), pages 21582440188, January.
    2. Liberatus J. Rwebugisa & Janet Usinger, 2021. "Empowerment Through Genuine Participation: Giving Voice to the Neglected Majority," Journal of Development Policy and Practice, , vol. 6(2), pages 144-167, July.
    3. Sabera Turkmani & Sarita Bista & Joanna J. J. Wang & Alexander W. O’Donnell & Catherine Thomson & Natasha Jane Radcliffe & Jennifer Skattebol & Gerry Redmond & Fiona Brooks, 2023. "Social and Emotional Wellbeing Among Young People; the Mitigating Role of Ecological Domains," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 16(3), pages 941-962, June.
    4. Rita Agdal & Inger Helen Midtgård & Vigdis Meidell, 2019. "Can Asset-Based Community Development with Children and Youth Enhance the Level of Participation in Health Promotion Projects? A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-19, October.
    5. Natura Colomer-Pérez & Elena Chover-Sierra & Vicente Gea-Caballero & Joan J. Paredes-Carbonell, 2020. "Health Assets, Vocation and Zest for Healthcare Work. A Salutogenic Approach to Active Coping among Certified Nursing Assistant Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-17, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0218597. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.