IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0215059.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Status, identity, and language: A study of issue discussions in GitHub

Author

Listed:
  • Jingxian Liao
  • Guowei Yang
  • David Kavaler
  • Vladimir Filkov
  • Prem Devanbu

Abstract

Successful open source software (OSS) projects comprise freely observable, task-oriented social networks with hundreds or thousands of participants and large amounts of (textual and technical) discussion. The sheer volume of interactions and participants makes it challenging for participants to find relevant tasks, discussions and people. Tagging (e.g., @AmySmith) is a socio-technical practice that enables more focused discussion. By tagging important and relevant people, discussions can be advanced more effectively. However, for all but a few insiders, it can be difficult to identify important and/or relevant people. In this paper we study tagging in OSS projects from a socio-linguistics perspective. First we argue that textual content per se reveals a great deal about the status and identity of who is speaking and who is being addressed. Next, we suggest that this phenomenon can be usefully modeled using modern deep-learning methods. Finally, we illustrate the value of these approaches with tools that could assist people to find the important and relevant people for a discussion.

Suggested Citation

  • Jingxian Liao & Guowei Yang & David Kavaler & Vladimir Filkov & Prem Devanbu, 2019. "Status, identity, and language: A study of issue discussions in GitHub," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0215059
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215059
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0215059
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0215059&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0215059?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marcelo A Montemurro & Damián H Zanette, 2011. "Universal Entropy of Word Ordering Across Linguistic Families," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(5), pages 1-9, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mehri, Ali & Jamaati, Maryam, 2021. "Statistical metrics for languages classification: A case study of the Bible translations," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    2. Heng Chen & Haitao Liu, 2018. "Quantifying Evolution of Short and Long-Range Correlations in Chinese Narrative Texts across 2000 Years," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-12, February.
    3. Louise Bogéa Ribeiro & Anderson Raiol Rodrigues & Kauê Machado Costa & Manoel da Silva Filho, 2019. "Quantification of textual comprehension difficulty with an information theory-based algorithm," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-9, December.
    4. Carlos F Alvarez & Luis E Palafox & Leocundo Aguilar & Mauricio A Sanchez & Luis G Martinez, 2016. "Using Link Disconnection Entropy Disorder to Detect Fast Moving Nodes in MANETs," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-15, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0215059. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.