IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0213595.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Substitution of low-risk skin cancer hospital care towards primary care: A qualitative study on views of general practitioners and dermatologists

Author

Listed:
  • E C Noels
  • M Wakkee
  • R R van den Bos
  • P J E Bindels
  • T Nijsten
  • M Lugtenberg

Abstract

Background: Rising healthcare expenditures places the potential for substitution of hospital care towards primary care high on the political agenda. As low-risk basal cell carcinoma (BCC) care is one of the potential targets for substitution of hospital care towards primary care the objective of this study is to gain insight in the views of healthcare professionals regarding substitution of skin cancer care, and to identify perceived barriers and potential strategies to facilitate substitution. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted consisting of 40 interviews with dermatologists and GPs and three focus groups with 18 selected GPs with noted willingness regarding substitution of skin cancer care. The interviews and focus groups focused on general views, perceived barriers and potential strategies to facilitate substitution of skin cancer care, using predefined topic lists. All sessions were audio-taped, transcribed verbatim and analyzed using the program AtlasTi. Results: GPs were generally positive regarding substitution of skin care whereas dermatologists expressed more concerns. Lack of trust in GPs to adequately perform skin cancer care and a preference of patients for dermatologists are reported as barriers by dermatologists. The main barriers reported by GPs were a lack of confidence in own skills to perform skin cancer care, a lack of trust from both patients and dermatologists and limited time and financial compensation. Facilitating strategies suggested by both groups mainly focused on improving GPs’ education and improving the collaboration between primary and secondary care. GPs additionally suggested efforts from dermatologists to increase their own and patients’ trust in GPs, and time and financial compensation. The selected group of GPs suggested practical solutions to facilitate substitution focusing on changes in organizational structure including horizontal referring, outreach models and practice size reduction. Conclusions: GPs and, to lesser extent, dermatologists are positive regarding substitution of low-risk BCC care, though report substantial barriers that need to be addressed before substitution can be further implemented. Aside from essential strategies such as improving GPs’ skin cancer education and time and financial compensation, rearranging the organizational structure in primary care and between primary and secondary care may facilitate effective and safe substitution of low-risk BCC care.

Suggested Citation

  • E C Noels & M Wakkee & R R van den Bos & P J E Bindels & T Nijsten & M Lugtenberg, 2019. "Substitution of low-risk skin cancer hospital care towards primary care: A qualitative study on views of general practitioners and dermatologists," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-21, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0213595
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213595
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0213595
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0213595&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0213595?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David A Cook & Laurie J Pencille & Denise M Dupras & Jane A Linderbaum & V Shane Pankratz & John M Wilkinson, 2018. "Practice variation and practice guidelines: Attitudes of generalist and specialist physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, January.
    2. Ros, Corina C. & Groenewegen, Peter P. & Delnoij, Diana M. J., 2000. "All rights reserved, or can we just copy? Cost sharing arrangements and characteristics of health care systems," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 1-13, May.
    3. Hayen, A.P. & van den Berg, M.J. & Meijboom, B.R. & Struijs, J.N. & Westert, G.P., 2015. "Incorporating shared savings programs into primary care : From theory to practice," Other publications TiSEM 2e26be96-1dc3-41fe-8dc9-c, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dros, Jesper T. & van Dijk, Christel E. & Bos, Isabelle & Meijer, Willemijn M. & Chorus, Astrid & Miedema, Harald & Veenhof, Cindy & Arslan, Ilgin G. & Meijboom, Bert R. & Verheij, Robert A., 2023. "Healthcare utilization patterns for knee and hip osteoarthritis before and after changes in national health insurance coverage: a data linkage study from the Netherlands," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Remers, Toine E.P. & Wackers, Erik M.E. & van Dulmen, Simone A. & Jeurissen, Patrick P.T., 2022. "Towards population-based payment models in a multiple-payer system: the case of the Netherlands," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(11), pages 1151-1156.
    2. Karen Geurts & Marc Bruijnzeels & Erik Schokkaert, 2022. "Do we care about high-cost patients? Estimating the savings on health spending by integrated care," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 23(8), pages 1297-1308, November.
    3. Pavlova, Milena & Groot, Wim & van Merode, Godefridus, 2002. "Public attitudes towards patient payments in Bulgarian public health care sector: results of a household survey," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 1-24, January.
    4. Danyliv, Andriy & Groot, Wim & Gryga, Irena & Pavlova, Milena, 2014. "Willingness and ability to pay for physician services in six Central and Eastern European countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 72-82.
    5. Kringos, Dionne S. & Boerma, Wienke G.W. & van der Zee, Jouke & Groenewegen, Peter P., 2013. "Political, cultural and economic foundations of primary care in Europe," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 9-17.
    6. Hayen, Arthur P. & Klein, Tobias J. & Salm, Martin, 2021. "Does the framing of patient cost-sharing incentives matter? the effects of deductibles vs. no-claim refunds," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    7. Groenewegen, Peter P. & Dourgnon, Paul & Greß, Stefan & Jurgutis, Arnoldas & Willems, Sara, 2013. "Strengthening weak primary care systems: Steps towards stronger primary care in selected Western and Eastern European countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 170-179.
    8. María José Cabañero‐Martínez & Juan Diego Ramos‐Pichardo & María Luisa Velasco‐Álvarez & Sofía García‐Sanjuán & Manuel Lillo‐Crespo & Julio Cabrero‐García, 2019. "Availability and perceived usefulness of guidelines and protocols for subcutaneous hydration in palliative care settings," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(21-22), pages 4012-4020, November.
    9. Klein, Tobias J. & Salm, Martin & Upadhyay, Suraj, 2022. "The response to dynamic incentives in insurance contracts with a deductible: Evidence from a differences-in-regression-discontinuities design," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    10. Li, Cheng & Yu, Xuan & Butler, James R.G. & Yiengprugsawan, Vasoontara & Yu, Min, 2011. "Moving towards universal health insurance in China: Performance, issues and lessons from Thailand," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(3), pages 359-366, August.
    11. Ugolini, Cristina & Lippi Bruni, Matteo & Leucci, Anna Caterina & Fiorentini, Gianluca & Berti, Elena & Nobilio, Lucia & Moro, Maria Luisa, 2019. "Disease management in diabetes care: When involving GPs improves patient compliance and health outcomes," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(10), pages 955-962.
    12. Klein, Tobias & Salm, Martin & Upadhyay, Suraj, 2020. "The Response to Dynamic Incentives in Insurance Contracts with a Deductible: Evidence from a Differences-in-Regression-Disconti," CEPR Discussion Papers 14552, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    13. Klein, T.J.; & Salm, M.; & Upadhyay, S.;, 2024. "Patient cost-sharing and redistribution in health insurance," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 24/15, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    14. Hayen, Arthur & van den Berg, Michael Jack & Struijs, Jeroen Nathan & Westert (Gert), Gerard Pieter, 2021. "Dutch shared savings program targeted at primary care: Reduced expenditures in its first year," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(4), pages 489-494.
    15. Hayen, A.P. & van den Berg, M.J. & Meijboom, B.R. & Struijs, J.N. & Westert, G.P., 2015. "Incorporating shared savings programs into primary care : From theory to practice," Other publications TiSEM 2e26be96-1dc3-41fe-8dc9-c, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    16. Eunja Park & Sookja Choi, 2020. "Who Benefits from the Fixed Copayment of Medical and Pharmaceutical Expenditure among the Korean Elderly?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-11, November.
    17. Sterre S. Bour & Lena H. A. Raaijmakers & Erik W. M. A. Bischoff & Lucas M. A. Goossens & Maureen P. M. H. Rutten-van Mölken, 2023. "How Can a Bundled Payment Model Incentivize the Transition from Single-Disease Management to Person-Centred and Integrated Care for Chronic Diseases in the Netherlands?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-20, February.
    18. Klein, Tobias J. & Salm, Martin & Upadhyay, Suraj, 2024. "Patient Cost-Sharing and Redistribution in Health Insurance," IZA Discussion Papers 16778, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0213595. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.