IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i21-22p4012-4020.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Availability and perceived usefulness of guidelines and protocols for subcutaneous hydration in palliative care settings

Author

Listed:
  • María José Cabañero‐Martínez
  • Juan Diego Ramos‐Pichardo
  • María Luisa Velasco‐Álvarez
  • Sofía García‐Sanjuán
  • Manuel Lillo‐Crespo
  • Julio Cabrero‐García

Abstract

Aims and objectives To evaluate the availability of, adherence to, and perceived usefulness of guidelines and protocols for managing hydration and subcutaneous hydration in palliative care settings. Background Hydration at the end of life and the use of a subcutaneous route to hydrate generate some controversy among health professionals for different reasons. Having guidelines and protocols to assist in decision‐making and to follow a standard procedure may be relevant in clinical practice. Design Cross‐sectional telephone survey, with closed‐ended and open‐ended questions designed specifically for this study. Methods Data were obtained from 327 professionals, each from a different palliative care service. Mean, standard deviation, minimum and maximum were calculated for continuous variables; frequency distributions were obtained for categorical variables. A qualitative content analysis was performed on the open‐ended questions. The article adheres to the STROBE guidelines for reporting observational studies. Results Only 24.8% of the participants had guidelines available to assist in making decisions regarding hydration, and 55.6% claimed to follow them ‘always or almost always’. Of the participants, 38.8% had subcutaneous hydration protocols available, while 78.7% stated that they ‘always or almost always’ followed these protocols. The remaining participants considered the protocols as useful tools despite not having them available. Conclusions Only 25% of the participants' services had guidelines for hydration, and less than 40% had protocols for subcutaneous hydration. However, adherence was high, especially in cases where protocols existed. Among the participants who did not have guidelines and protocols, attitudes were mostly favourable, but mainly as a reference and support for an individualised clinical practice. Relevance to clinical practice Guidelines and protocols on hydration in palliative care may be more useful as a solid reference and support for individualised practice than as instruments for standardising care. From this perspective, their development and availability in palliative care services are recommended.

Suggested Citation

  • María José Cabañero‐Martínez & Juan Diego Ramos‐Pichardo & María Luisa Velasco‐Álvarez & Sofía García‐Sanjuán & Manuel Lillo‐Crespo & Julio Cabrero‐García, 2019. "Availability and perceived usefulness of guidelines and protocols for subcutaneous hydration in palliative care settings," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(21-22), pages 4012-4020, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:21-22:p:4012-4020
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15036
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15036?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liz Forbat & Natalie Kunicki & Michael Chapman & Clare Lovell, 2017. "How and why are subcutaneous fluids administered in an advanced illness population: a systematic review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(9-10), pages 1204-1216, May.
    2. Isabel Higgins & Pamela van der Riet & Ludmilla Sneesby & Phillip Good, 2014. "Nutrition and hydration in dying patients: the perceptions of acute care nurses," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(17-18), pages 2609-2617, September.
    3. Corallo, Ashley N. & Croxford, Ruth & Goodman, David C. & Bryan, Elisabeth L. & Srivastava, Divya & Stukel, Therese A., 2014. "A systematic review of medical practice variation in OECD countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(1), pages 5-14.
    4. David A Cook & Laurie J Pencille & Denise M Dupras & Jane A Linderbaum & V Shane Pankratz & John M Wilkinson, 2018. "Practice variation and practice guidelines: Attitudes of generalist and specialist physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kollerup, Anna & Wadmann, Sarah & Bek, Toke & Kjellberg, Jakob, 2022. "National clinical guidelines and treatment centralization do not guarantee consistency in healthcare delivery. A mixed-methods study of wet age-related macular degeneration treatment in Denmark," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(12), pages 1291-1302.
    2. Stefan Rabbe & Meilin Möllenkamp & Benedetta Pongiglione & Hedwig Blommestein & Pim Wetzelaer & Renaud Heine & Jonas Schreyögg, 2022. "Variation in the utilization of medical devices across Germany, Italy, and the Netherlands: A multilevel approach," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(S1), pages 135-156, September.
    3. E C Noels & M Wakkee & R R van den Bos & P J E Bindels & T Nijsten & M Lugtenberg, 2019. "Substitution of low-risk skin cancer hospital care towards primary care: A qualitative study on views of general practitioners and dermatologists," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-21, March.
    4. Adetunji, Oluwarantimi & Ottino, Kevin & Tucker, Austin & Al-Attar, Ghada & Abduljabbar, Mohammad & Bishai, David, 2020. "Variations in pediatric hospitalization in seven European countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(11), pages 1165-1173.
    5. Negar Darabi & Niyousha Hosseinichimeh, 2020. "System dynamics modeling in health and medicine: a systematic literature review," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 36(1), pages 29-73, January.
    6. Sophie Massin & Antoine Nebout & Bruno Ventelou, 2018. "Predicting medical practices using various risk attitude measures," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 19(6), pages 843-860, July.
    7. Noémie Malléjac & Zeynep Or, 2019. "Évaluation d'impact d'une nouvelle organisation en chirurgie orthopédique sur les parcours de soins," Post-Print hal-04225092, HAL.
    8. Seghieri, Chiara & Berta, Paolo & Nuti, Sabina, 2019. "Geographic variation in inpatient costs for Acute Myocardial Infarction care: Insights from Italy," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(5), pages 449-456.
    9. Unto Häkkinen & Tor Iversen & Mikko Peltola & Clas Rehnberg & Timo T. Seppälä & on behalf of the EuroHOPE study group, 2015. "Towards Explaining International Differences in Health Care Performance: Results of the EuroHOPE Project," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(S2), pages 1-4, December.
    10. David A Cook & Laurie J Pencille & Denise M Dupras & Jane A Linderbaum & V Shane Pankratz & John M Wilkinson, 2018. "Practice variation and practice guidelines: Attitudes of generalist and specialist physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, January.
    11. Pia Kjær Kristensen & Raquel Perez-Vicente & George Leckie & Søren Paaske Johnsen & Juan Merlo, 2020. "Disentangling the contribution of hospitals and municipalities for understanding patient level differences in one-year mortality risk after hip-fracture: A cross-classified multilevel analysis in Swed," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-14, June.
    12. Daisy Duell & Xander Koolman & France Portrait, 2017. "Practice variation in the Dutch long‐term care and the role of supply‐sensitive care: Is access to the Dutch long‐term care equitable?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(12), pages 1728-1742, December.
    13. Gutacker, Nils & Bloor, Karen & Bojke, Chris & Walshe, Kieran, 2018. "Should interventions to reduce variation in care quality target doctors or hospitals?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(6), pages 660-666.
    14. Vidoli, Francesco & Pignataro, Giacomo & Benedetti, Roberto, 2022. "Identification of spatial regimes of the production function of Italian hospitals through spatially constrained cluster-wise regression," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PA).
    15. Brigid M. Gillespie & Rachel Walker & Frances Lin & Shelley Roberts & Anne Eskes & Jodie Perry & Sean Birgan & Paul Nieuwenhoven & Elizabeth Garrahy & Rosalind Probert & Wendy Chaboyer, 2020. "Wound care practices across two acute care settings: A comparative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5-6), pages 831-839, March.
    16. Jacobs, Karel & Roman, Erin & Lambert, Jo & Moke, Lieven & Scheys, Lennart & Kesteloot, Katrien & Roodhooft, Filip & Cardoen, Brecht, 2022. "Variability drivers of treatment costs in hospitals: A systematic review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(2), pages 75-86.
    17. Proksch, Dorian & Busch-Casler, Julia & Haberstroh, Marcus Max & Pinkwart, Andreas, 2019. "National health innovation systems: Clustering the OECD countries by innovative output in healthcare using a multi indicator approach," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 169-179.
    18. Daisy Duell & Maarten Lindeboom & Xander Koolman & France Portrait, 2019. "Practice variation in long‐term care access and use: The role of the ability to pay," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(11), pages 1277-1292, November.
    19. Weeks, William B. & Paraponaris, Alain & Ventelou, Bruno, 2014. "Geographic variation in rates of common surgical procedures in France in 2008–2010, and comparison to the US and Britain," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(2), pages 215-221.
    20. Ugolini, Cristina & Lippi Bruni, Matteo & Leucci, Anna Caterina & Fiorentini, Gianluca & Berti, Elena & Nobilio, Lucia & Moro, Maria Luisa, 2019. "Disease management in diabetes care: When involving GPs improves patient compliance and health outcomes," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(10), pages 955-962.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:21-22:p:4012-4020. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.