IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0201355.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A network perspective of engaging patients in specialist and chronic illness care: The 2014 International Health Policy Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Yi-Sheng Chao
  • Marco Scutari
  • Tai-Shen Chen
  • Chao-Jung Wu
  • Madeleine Durand
  • Antoine Boivin
  • Hsing-Chien Wu
  • Wei-Chih Chen

Abstract

Background: Patient engagement helps to improve health outcomes and health care quality. However, the overall relationships among patient engagement measures and health outcomes remain unclear. This study aims to integrate expert knowledge and survey data for the identification of measures that have extensive associations with other variables and can be prioritized to engage patients. Methods: We used the 2014 International Health Policy Survey (IHPS), which provided information on elder adults in 11 countries with details in patient characteristics, healthcare experiences, and patient-physician communication. Patient engagement or support was measured with eight variables including patients’ treatment choices, involvement, and treatment priority setting. Three types of care were identified: primary, specialist and chronic illness care. Specialists were doctors specializing in one area of health care. Chronic illness included eight chronic conditions surveyed. Expert knowledge was used to assist variable selection. We used Bayesian network models consisting of nodes that represented variables of interest and arcs that represented their relationships. Results: Among 25,530 participants, the mean age was 68.51 years and 57.40% were females. The distributions of age, sex, education, and patient engagement were significantly different across countries. For chronic illness care, written plans provided by professionals were linked to treatment feasibility and helpfulness. Whether professionals contacted patients was associated with the availability of professionals they could reach for chronic illness care. For specialist care, if specialists provided treatment choices, patients were more likely to be involved and discuss about what mattered to them. Conclusion: The strategies to engage patients may depend on the types of care, specialist or chronic illness care. For the study on the observational IHPS data, network modeling is useful to integrate expert knowledge. We suggest considering other theory-based patient engagement in major surveys, as well as engaging patients in their healthcare by providing written plans and actively communicating with patients for chronic illnesses, and encouraging specialists to discuss and provide treatment options.

Suggested Citation

  • Yi-Sheng Chao & Marco Scutari & Tai-Shen Chen & Chao-Jung Wu & Madeleine Durand & Antoine Boivin & Hsing-Chien Wu & Wei-Chih Chen, 2018. "A network perspective of engaging patients in specialist and chronic illness care: The 2014 International Health Policy Survey," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-21, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0201355
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201355
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0201355
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0201355&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0201355?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Uusitalo, Laura, 2007. "Advantages and challenges of Bayesian networks in environmental modelling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 203(3), pages 312-318.
    2. Lumley, Thomas, 2004. "Analysis of Complex Survey Samples," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 9(i08).
    3. Scutari, Marco, 2010. "Learning Bayesian Networks with the bnlearn R Package," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 35(i03).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meineri, Eric & Dahlberg, C. Johan & Hylander, Kristoffer, 2015. "Using Gaussian Bayesian Networks to disentangle direct and indirect associations between landscape physiography, environmental variables and species distribution," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 313(C), pages 127-136.
    2. Bryan Keller, 2020. "Variable Selection for Causal Effect Estimation: Nonparametric Conditional Independence Testing With Random Forests," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 45(2), pages 119-142, April.
    3. Leszek Chomacki & Janusz Rusek & Leszek Słowik, 2022. "Machine Learning Methods in Damage Prediction of Masonry Development Exposed to the Industrial Environment of Mines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-23, May.
    4. Prabal Das & D. A. Sachindra & Kironmala Chanda, 2022. "Machine Learning-Based Rainfall Forecasting with Multiple Non-Linear Feature Selection Algorithms," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(15), pages 6043-6071, December.
    5. Vuong, Quan-Hoang & La, Viet-Phuong, 2019. "The bayesvl R package. User guide v0.8.1," OSF Preprints w5dx6, Center for Open Science.
    6. Maciej Berk{e}sewicz & Herman Cherniaiev & Robert Pater, 2021. "Estimating the number of entities with vacancies using administrative and online data," Papers 2106.03263, arXiv.org.
    7. F. Cugnata & G. Perucca & S. Salini, 2017. "Bayesian networks and the assessment of universities' value added," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(10), pages 1785-1806, July.
    8. Di Zhang & Xinping Yan & Zaili Yang & Jin Wang, 2014. "An accident data–based approach for congestion risk assessment of inland waterways: A Yangtze River case," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 228(2), pages 176-188, April.
    9. Zhang, Quanzhong & Wei, Haiyan & Liu, Jing & Zhao, Zefang & Ran, Qiao & Gu, Wei, 2021. "A Bayesian network with fuzzy mathematics for species habitat suitability analysis: A case with limited Angelica sinensis (Oliv.) Diels data," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 450(C).
    10. Roland R. Ramsahai, 2020. "Connecting actuarial judgment to probabilistic learning techniques with graph theory," Papers 2007.15475, arXiv.org.
    11. Tang, Kayu & Parsons, David J. & Jude, Simon, 2019. "Comparison of automatic and guided learning for Bayesian networks to analyse pipe failures in the water distribution system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 24-36.
    12. Jim Lewis & Kerrie Mengersen & Laurie Buys & Desley Vine & John Bell & Peter Morris & Gerard Ledwich, 2015. "Systems Modelling of the Socio-Technical Aspects of Residential Electricity Use and Network Peak Demand," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-21, July.
    13. Myriam Patricia Cifuentes & Clara Mercedes Suarez & Ricardo Cifuentes & Noel Malod-Dognin & Sam Windels & Jose Fernando Valderrama & Paul D. Juarez & R. Burciaga Valdez & Cynthia Colen & Charles Phill, 2022. "Big Data to Knowledge Analytics Reveals the Zika Virus Epidemic as Only One of Multiple Factors Contributing to a Year-Over-Year 28-Fold Increase in Microcephaly Incidence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-21, July.
    14. Nicholson, Ann E. & Flores, M. Julia, 2011. "Combining state and transition models with dynamic Bayesian networks," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(3), pages 555-566.
    15. Moe, S. Jannicke & Haande, Sigrid & Couture, Raoul-Marie, 2016. "Climate change, cyanobacteria blooms and ecological status of lakes: A Bayesian network approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 337(C), pages 330-347.
    16. J. Michael Brick & Michael E. Jones, 2008. "Propensity to respond and nonresponse bias," Metron - International Journal of Statistics, Dipartimento di Statistica, Probabilità e Statistiche Applicate - University of Rome, vol. 0(1), pages 51-73.
    17. Silvia de Juan & Maria Dulce Subida & Andres Ospina-Alvarez & Ainara Aguilar & Miriam Fernandez, 2020. "Disentangling the socio-ecological drivers behind illegal fishing in a small-scale fishery managed by a TURF system," Papers 2012.08970, arXiv.org.
    18. Michail Tsagris, 2021. "A New Scalable Bayesian Network Learning Algorithm with Applications to Economics," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 57(1), pages 341-367, January.
    19. Mostafa Shaaban & Carmen Schwartz & Joseph Macpherson & Annette Piorr, 2021. "A Conceptual Model Framework for Mapping, Analyzing and Managing Supply–Demand Mismatches of Ecosystem Services in Agricultural Landscapes," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-19, January.
    20. Jacques Muthusi & Samuel Mwalili & Peter Young, 2019. "%svy_logistic_regression: A generic SAS macro for simple and multiple logistic regression and creating quality publication-ready tables using survey or non-survey data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-14, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0201355. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.