IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0190268.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A transcriptomics approach uncovers novel roles for poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation in the basal defense response in Arabidopsis thaliana

Author

Listed:
  • Amy G Briggs
  • Lori C Adams-Phillips
  • Brian D Keppler
  • Sophia G Zebell
  • Kyle C Arend
  • April A Apfelbaum
  • Joshua A Smith
  • Andrew F Bent

Abstract

Pharmacological inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) or loss of Arabidopsis thaliana PARG1 (poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase) disrupt a subset of plant defenses. In the present study we examined the impact of altered poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation on early gene expression induced by the microbe-associate molecular patterns (MAMPs) flagellin (flg22) and EF-Tu (elf18). Stringent statistical analyses and filtering identified 178 genes having MAMP-induced mRNA abundance patterns that were altered by either PARP inhibitor 3-aminobenzamide (3AB) or PARG1 knockout. From the identified set of 178 genes, over fifty Arabidopsis T-DNA insertion lines were chosen and screened for altered basal defense responses. Subtle alterations in callose deposition and/or seedling growth in response to those MAMPs were observed in knockouts of At3g55630 (FPGS3, a cytosolic folylpolyglutamate synthetase), At5g15660 (containing an F-box domain), At1g47370 (a TIR-X (Toll-Interleukin Receptor domain)), and At5g64060 (a predicted pectin methylesterase inhibitor). Over-represented GO terms for the gene expression study included "innate immune response" for elf18/parg1, highlighting a subset of elf18-activated defense-associated genes whose expression is altered in parg1 plants. The study also allowed a tightly controlled comparison of early mRNA abundance responses to flg22 and elf18 in wild-type Arabidopsis, which revealed many differences. The PARP inhibitor 3-methoxybenzamide (3MB) was also used in the gene expression profiling, but pleiotropic impacts of this inhibitor were observed. This transcriptomics study revealed targets for further dissection of MAMP-induced plant immune responses, impacts of PARP inhibitors, and the molecular mechanisms by which poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation regulates plant responses to MAMPs.

Suggested Citation

  • Amy G Briggs & Lori C Adams-Phillips & Brian D Keppler & Sophia G Zebell & Kyle C Arend & April A Apfelbaum & Joshua A Smith & Andrew F Bent, 2017. "A transcriptomics approach uncovers novel roles for poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation in the basal defense response in Arabidopsis thaliana," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-30, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0190268
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190268
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0190268
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0190268&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0190268?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeffery L. Dangl & Jonathan D. G. Jones, 2001. "Plant pathogens and integrated defence responses to infection," Nature, Nature, vol. 411(6839), pages 826-833, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lei Xu & Yanchao Xu & Huanhuan Lv & Yanran Xu & Jiangqi Wen & Mingna Li & Junmei Kang & Zhipeng Liu & Qingchuan Yang & Ruicai Long, 2024. "Transcriptomic Analysis Reveals the Mechanism of MtLOX24 in Response to Methyl Jasmonate Stress in Medicago truncatula," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Mohammad Imad khrieba, 2019. "Mycorrhizae’s Role in Plant Nutrition and Protection from Pathogens," Current Investigations in Agriculture and Current Research, Lupine Publishers, LLC, vol. 8(1), pages 1037-1045, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0190268. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.