The influence of anonymous peers on prosocial behavior
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185521
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Sarah Smith & Frank Windmeijer & Edmund Wright, 2015.
"Peer Effects in Charitable Giving: Evidence from the (Running) Field,"
Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 125(585), pages 1053-1071, June.
- Sarah Smith & Frank Windmeijer & Edmund Wright, 2012. "Peer effects in charitable giving: Evidence from the (running) field," The Centre for Market and Public Organisation 12/290, The Centre for Market and Public Organisation, University of Bristol, UK.
- Sarah Smith & Frank Windmeijer & Edmund Wright, 2013. "Peer effects in charitable giving: Evidence from the (running) field," The Centre for Market and Public Organisation 13/302, The Centre for Market and Public Organisation, University of Bristol, UK.
- David Reinstein & Gerhard Riener, 2012.
"Reputation and influence in charitable giving: an experiment,"
Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 72(2), pages 221-243, February.
- Reinstein, David & Riener, Gerhard, 2010. "Reputation and Influence in Charitable Giving: An Experiment," Economics Discussion Papers 2934, University of Essex, Department of Economics.
- Meer, Jonathan, 2011.
"Brother, can you spare a dime? Peer pressure in charitable solicitation,"
Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(7), pages 926-941.
- Meer, Jonathan, 2011. "Brother, can you spare a dime? Peer pressure in charitable solicitation," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(7-8), pages 926-941, August.
- Yoshie Matsumoto & Toshio Yamagishi & Yang Li & Toko Kiyonari, 2016. "Prosocial Behavior Increases with Age across Five Economic Games," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, July.
- Shantz, Amanda & Latham, Gary P., 2009. "An exploratory field experiment of the effect of subconscious and conscious goals on employee performance," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 109(1), pages 9-17, May.
- Friederike Mengel, 2014. "Computer Games and Prosocial Behaviour," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-5, April.
- Simon Gächter & Daniele Nosenzo & Martin Sefton, 2013.
"Peer Effects In Pro-Social Behavior: Social Norms Or Social Preferences?,"
Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 11(3), pages 548-573, June.
- Simon Gaechter & Daniele Nosenzo & Martin Sefton, 2010. "Peer Effects In Pro-Social Behavior: Social Norms Or Social Preferences?," Discussion Papers 2010-23, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
- Gächter, Simon & Nosenzo, Daniele & Sefton, Martin, 2012. "Peer Effects in Pro-Social Behavior: Social Norms or Social Preferences?," IZA Discussion Papers 6345, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Simon Gachter & Daniele Nosenzo & Martin Sefton, 2012. "Peer Effects in Pro-Social Behaviour: Social Norms or Social Preferences?," Discussion Papers 2012-01, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
- Martin, Richard & Randal, John, 2008. "How is donation behaviour affected by the donations of others?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 228-238, July.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Drouvelis, Michalis & Marx, Benjamin M., 2022.
"Can charitable appeals identify and exploit belief heterogeneity?,"
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 631-649.
- Michalis Drouvelis & Benjamin M. Marx, 2021. "Can Charitable Appeals Identify and Exploit Belief Heterogeneity?," CESifo Working Paper Series 8855, CESifo.
- Park, Sangkon & Nam, Sohyun & Lee, Jungmin, 2017. "Charitable giving, suggestion, and learning from others: Pay-What-You-Want experiments at a coffee shop," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 16-22.
- Dimant, Eugen, 2015.
"On Peer Effects: Behavioral Contagion of (Un)Ethical Behavior and the Role of Social Identity,"
MPRA Paper
68732, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Eugen Dimant, 2016. "On Peer Effects: Contagion of Pro- and Anti-Social Behavior in Charitable Giving and The Role of Social Identity," PPE Working Papers 0006, Philosophy, Politics and Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
- Eugen Dimant, 2017. "On Peer Effects: Contagion of Pro- and Anti-Social Behavior and the Role of Social Cohesion," Discussion Papers 2017-06, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
- Eugen Dimant, 2018. "Contagion of Pro- and Anti-Social Behavior Among Peers and the Role of Social Proximity," Discussion Papers 2018-04, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
- Michalis Drouvelis & Benjamin M. Marx, 2021.
"Dimensions of donation preferences: the structure of peer and income effects,"
Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 24(1), pages 274-302, March.
- Michalis Drouvelis & Benjamin M. Marx, 2019. "Dimensions of Donation Preferences: The Structure of Peer and Income Effects," CESifo Working Paper Series 7496, CESifo.
- Dimant, Eugen, 2019.
"Contagion of pro- and anti-social behavior among peers and the role of social proximity,"
Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 66-88.
- Eugen Dimant, 2018. "Contagion of Pro- and Anti-Social Behavior Among Peers and the Role of Social Proximity," Discussion Papers 2018-04, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
- Eugen Dimant, 2020. "Contagion of Pro- and Anti-Social Behavior among Peers and the Role of Social Proximity," CESifo Working Paper Series 8263, CESifo.
- David Klinowski, 2021. "Reluctant donors and their reactions to social information," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 24(2), pages 515-535, June.
- Goerg, Sebastian J. & Himmler, Oliver & König, Tobias, 2024.
"Norm violations and behavioral spillovers—Evidence from the lab and the field,"
European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
- Goerg, Sebastian J. & Himmler, Oliver & König, Tobias, 2024. "Norm Violations and Behavioral Spillovers: Evidence from the Lab and the Field," Working Papers in Economics and Statistics 8/2024, Linnaeus University, School of Business and Economics, Department of Economics and Statistics.
- Zizzo, Daniel John, 2013. "Claims and confounds in economic experiments," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 186-195.
- Gómez, Patricia & Shaikh, Nazrul I. & Erkoc, Murat, 2024. "Continuous improvement in the efficient use of energy in office buildings through peers effects," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 360(C).
- Fazio, Andrea & Reggiani, Tommaso & Scervini, Francesco, 2023.
"Social media charity campaigns and pro-social behaviour. Evidence from the Ice Bucket Challenge,"
Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
- Andrea Fazio & Francesco Scervini & Tommaso Reggiani, 2022. "Social media charity campaigns and pro-social behavior. Evidence from the Ice Bucket Challenge," MUNI ECON Working Papers 2022-09, Masaryk University, revised Feb 2023.
- Fazio, Andrea & Reggiani, Tommaso & Scervini, Francesco, 2023. "Social media charity campaigns and pro-social behaviour. Evidence from the Ice Bucket Challenge," Cardiff Economics Working Papers E2023/6, Cardiff University, Cardiff Business School, Economics Section.
- Fazio, Andrea & Reggiani, Tommaso G. & Scervini, Francesco, 2023. "Social Media Charity Campaigns and Pro-social Behaviour. Evidence from the Ice Bucket Challenge," IZA Discussion Papers 16046, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Tobias Regner & Gerhard Riener, 2011.
"Motivational Cherry Picking,"
Jena Economics Research Papers
2011-029, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
- Regner, Tobias & Riener, Gerhard, 2012. "Motivational cherry picking," DICE Discussion Papers 68, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
- Scharf, Kimberley & Smith, Sarah, 2014.
"Relational Warm Glow and Giving in Social Groups,"
CEPR Discussion Papers
10051, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Scharf, Kimberley & Smith, Sarah, 2014. "Relational Warm Glow and Giving in Social Groups," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 193, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
- Sarah Smith & Kimberley Scharf, 2014. "Relational Warm Glow and Giving in Social Groups," The Centre for Market and Public Organisation 14/327, The Centre for Market and Public Organisation, University of Bristol, UK.
- Kimberley Ann Scharf & Sarah Smith, 2014. "Relational Warm Glow and Giving in Social Groups," CESifo Working Paper Series 4879, CESifo.
- Simona Cicognani & Sebastian Stein & Mirco Tonin & Michael Vlassopoulos, 2023. "Symbolic incentives and the recruitment of volunteers for citizen science projects," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 75(4), pages 923-940.
- Michael Sanders & David Reinstein, 2014. "Worth 1000 Words: The effect of social cues on a fundraising campaign in a government agency. A field experiment," The Centre for Market and Public Organisation 14/324, The Centre for Market and Public Organisation, University of Bristol, UK.
- John A. List & James J. Murphy & Michael K. Price & Alexander G. James, 2019.
"Do Appeals to Donor Benefits Raise More Money than Appeals to Recipient Benefits? Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment with Pick.Click.Give,"
NBER Working Papers
26559, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- John A. List & James J. Murphy & Michael K. Price & Alexander G. James, 2019. "Do Appeals to Donor Benefits Raise More Money than Appeals to Recipient Benefits? Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment with Pick.Click.Give," Working Papers 19-31, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
- Alexander James & John List & James Murphy & Michael Price, 2019. "Do Appeals to Donor Benefits Raise More Money than Appeals to Recipient Benefits? Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment with Pick.Click.Give," Natural Field Experiments 00682, The Field Experiments Website.
- John List & James Murphy & Michael Price & Alexander James, 2019. "Do Appeals to Donor Benefits Raise More Money than Appeals to Recipient Benefits? Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment with Pick.Click.Give," Working Papers 2019-07, University of Alaska Anchorage, Department of Economics.
- Britta Butz & Christine Harbring, 2022. "Tipping for charity: a field experiment in charitable giving on free walking tours," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 92(5), pages 781-808, July.
- Itzhak Rasooly & Roberto Rozzi, 2022. "Masks, Cameras, and Social Pressure," SciencePo Working papers hal-03892947, HAL.
- Sasaki, Shusaku, 2019. "Majority size and conformity behavior in charitable giving: Field evidence from a donation-based crowdfunding platform in Japan," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 36-51.
- Juliane Proelss & Denis Schweizer & Tingyu Zhou, 2021. "Economics of philanthropy—evidence from health crowdfunding," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 999-1026, August.
- Deng, Weiguang & Jiang, Shengjun & Li, Xue & Ye, Maoliang, 2024. "Peer effects in donations: Evidence from random assignment of college roommates," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 631-644.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0185521. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.