IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0182621.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cooperative vehicles for robust traffic congestion reduction: An analysis based on algorithmic, environmental and agent behavioral factors

Author

Listed:
  • Prajakta Desai
  • Seng W Loke
  • Aniruddha Desai

Abstract

Traffic congestion continues to be a persistent problem throughout the world. As vehicle-to-vehicle communication develops, there is an opportunity of using cooperation among close proximity vehicles to tackle the congestion problem. The intuition is that if vehicles could cooperate opportunistically when they come close enough to each other, they could, in effect, spread themselves out among alternative routes so that vehicles do not all jam up on the same roads. Our previous work proposed a decentralized multiagent based vehicular congestion management algorithm entitled Congestion Avoidance and Route Allocation using Virtual Agent Negotiation (CARAVAN), wherein the vehicles acting as intelligent agents perform cooperative route allocation using inter-vehicular communication. This paper focuses on evaluating the practical applicability of this approach by testing its robustness and performance (in terms of travel time reduction), across variations in: (a) environmental parameters such as road network topology and configuration; (b) algorithmic parameters such as vehicle agent preferences and route cost/preference multipliers; and (c) agent-related parameters such as equipped/non-equipped vehicles and compliant/non-compliant agents. Overall, the results demonstrate the adaptability and robustness of the decentralized cooperative vehicles approach to providing global travel time reduction using simple local coordination strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Prajakta Desai & Seng W Loke & Aniruddha Desai, 2017. "Cooperative vehicles for robust traffic congestion reduction: An analysis based on algorithmic, environmental and agent behavioral factors," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-19, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0182621
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182621
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0182621
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0182621&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0182621?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roozemond, Danko A., 2001. "Using intelligent agents for pro-active, real-time urban intersection control," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(2), pages 293-301, June.
    2. Rodolfo I Meneguette & Geraldo P R Filho & Daniel L Guidoni & Gustavo Pessin & Leandro A Villas & Jó Ueyama, 2016. "Increasing Intelligence in Inter-Vehicle Communications to Reduce Traffic Congestions: Experiments in Urban and Highway Environments," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-25, August.
    3. Adler, Jeffrey L. & Satapathy, Goutam & Manikonda, Vikram & Bowles, Betty & Blue, Victor J., 2005. "A multi-agent approach to cooperative traffic management and route guidance," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 297-318, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pi, Xidong & Qian, Zhen (Sean), 2017. "A stochastic optimal control approach for real-time traffic routing considering demand uncertainties and travelers’ choice heterogeneity," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 710-732.
    2. Xia Xiao & Xiaowu Mu, 2017. "Consensus of linear multi-agent systems with communication delays by using the information of second-order neighbours under intermittent communication topology," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(1), pages 200-208, January.
    3. Kshama Dwarakanath & Svitlana Vyetrenko & Tucker Balch, 2024. "Empirical Equilibria in Agent-based Economic systems with Learning agents," Papers 2408.12038, arXiv.org.
    4. Kshama Dwarakanath & Svitlana Vyetrenko & Peyman Tavallali & Tucker Balch, 2024. "ABIDES-Economist: Agent-Based Simulation of Economic Systems with Learning Agents," Papers 2402.09563, arXiv.org.
    5. Iago C. Cavalcante & Rodolfo I. Meneguette & Renato H. Torres & Leandro Y. Mano & Vinícius P. Gonçalves & Jó Ueyama & Gustavo Pessin & Georges D. Amvame Nze & Geraldo P. Rocha Filho, 2022. "Federated System for Transport Mode Detection," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Kassens-Noor, Eva & Dake, Dana & Decaminada, Travis & Kotval-K, Zeenat & Qu, Teresa & Wilson, Mark & Pentland, Brian, 2020. "Sociomobility of the 21st century: Autonomous vehicles, planning, and the future city," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 329-335.
    7. Ge, Jiaqi & Polhill, J. Gareth & Craig, Tony P., 2018. "Too much of a good thing? Using a spatial agent-based model to evaluate “unconventional” workplace sharing programmes," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 83-97.
    8. Yangjie Chen & Fan Zhang & Jianning Li, 2022. "Anti-Disturbance Fault-Tolerant Constrained Consensus for Time-Delay Faulty Multi-Agent Systems with Semi-Markov Switching Topology," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(23), pages 1-17, December.
    9. Liu, Ronghui & Van Vliet, Dirck & Watling, David, 2006. "Microsimulation models incorporating both demand and supply dynamics," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 125-150, February.
    10. Emiliano Brancaccio & Mauro Gallegati & Raffaele Giammetti, 2022. "Neoclassical influences in agent‐based literature: A systematic review," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 350-385, April.
    11. Balmer, Roberto E. & Levin, Stanford L. & Schmidt, Stephen, 2020. "Artificial Intelligence Applications in Telecommunications and other network industries," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(6).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0182621. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.