IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0173834.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Long-term effects of interference on short-term memory performance in the rat

Author

Listed:
  • Mégane Missaire
  • Nicolas Fraize
  • Mickaël Antoine Joseph
  • Al Mahdy Hamieh
  • Régis Parmentier
  • Aline Marighetto
  • Paul Antoine Salin
  • Gaël Malleret

Abstract

A distinction has always been made between long-term and short-term memory (also now called working memory, WM). The obvious difference between these two kinds of memory concerns the duration of information storage: information is supposedly transiently stored in WM while it is considered durably consolidated into long-term memory. It is well acknowledged that the content of WM is erased and reset after a short time, to prevent irrelevant information from proactively interfering with newly stored information. In the present study, we used typical WM radial maze tasks to question the brief lifespan of spatial WM content in rodents. Groups of rats were submitted to one of two different WM tasks in a radial maze: a WM task involving the repetitive presentation of a same pair of arms expected to induce a high level of proactive interference (PI) (HIWM task), or a task using a different pair in each trial expected to induce a low level of PI (LIWM task). Performance was effectively lower in the HIWM group than in LIWM in the final trial of each training session, indicative of a “within-session/short-term” PI effect. However, we also observed a different “between-session/long-term” PI effect between the two groups: while performance of LIWM trained rats remained stable over days, the performance of HIWM rats dropped after 10 days of training, and this impairment was visible from the very first trial of the day, hence not attributable to within-session PI. We also showed that a 24 hour-gap across training sessions known to allow consolidation processes to unfold, was a necessary and sufficient condition for the long-term PI effect to occur. These findings suggest that in the HIWM task, WM content was not entirely reset between training sessions and that, in specific conditions, WM content can outlast its purpose by being stored more permanently, generating a long-term deleterious effect of PI. The alternative explanation is that WM content could be transferred and stored more permanently in an intermediary form or memory between WM and long-term memory.

Suggested Citation

  • Mégane Missaire & Nicolas Fraize & Mickaël Antoine Joseph & Al Mahdy Hamieh & Régis Parmentier & Aline Marighetto & Paul Antoine Salin & Gaël Malleret, 2017. "Long-term effects of interference on short-term memory performance in the rat," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0173834
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173834
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0173834
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0173834&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0173834?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bruno Bontempi & Catherine Laurent-Demir & Claude Destrade & Robert Jaffard, 1999. "Time-dependent reorganization of brain circuitry underlying long-term memory storage," Nature, Nature, vol. 400(6745), pages 671-675, August.
    2. Amar Sahay & Kimberly N. Scobie & Alexis S. Hill & Colin M. O'Carroll & Mazen A. Kheirbek & Nesha S. Burghardt & André A. Fenton & Alex Dranovsky & René Hen, 2011. "Increasing adult hippocampal neurogenesis is sufficient to improve pattern separation," Nature, Nature, vol. 472(7344), pages 466-470, April.
    3. Ya-Ping Tang & Eiji Shimizu & Gilles R. Dube & Claire Rampon & Geoffrey A. Kerchner & Min Zhuo & Guosong Liu & Joe Z. Tsien, 1999. "Genetic enhancement of learning and memory in mice," Nature, Nature, vol. 401(6748), pages 63-69, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicola Forte & Serena Boccella & Lea Tunisi & Alba Clara Fernández-Rilo & Roberta Imperatore & Fabio Arturo Iannotti & Maria Risi & Monica Iannotta & Fabiana Piscitelli & Raffaele Capasso & Paolo Giro, 2021. "Orexin-A and endocannabinoids are involved in obesity-associated alteration of hippocampal neurogenesis, plasticity, and episodic memory in mice," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, December.
    2. David M Santucci & Sridhar Raghavachari, 2008. "The Effects of NR2 Subunit-Dependent NMDA Receptor Kinetics on Synaptic Transmission and CaMKII Activation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(10), pages 1-16, October.
    3. Karpinski, Ruth I. & Kinase Kolb, Audrey M. & Tetreault, Nicole A. & Borowski, Thomas B., 2018. "High intelligence: A risk factor for psychological and physiological overexcitabilities," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 8-23.
    4. Bao-Fei Sun & Qing-Qing Wang & Zi-Jiang Yu & Yan Yu & Chao-Lun Xiao & Chao-Sheng Kang & Guo Ge & Yan Linghu & Jun-De Zhu & Yu-Mei Li & Qiang-Ming Li & Shi-Peng Luo & Dang Yang & Lin Li & Wen-Yan Zhang, 2015. "Exercise Prevents Memory Impairment Induced by Arsenic Exposure in Mice: Implication of Hippocampal BDNF and CREB," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-15, September.
    5. Yiu Chung Tse & Rosemary C Bagot & Juliana A Hutter & Alice S Wong & Tak Pan Wong, 2011. "Modulation of Synaptic Plasticity by Stress Hormone Associates with Plastic Alteration of Synaptic NMDA Receptor in the Adult Hippocampus," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(11), pages 1-14, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0173834. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.