IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0166930.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Observing Consistency in Online Communication Patterns for User Re-Identification

Author

Listed:
  • Ikuesan Richard Adeyemi
  • Shukor Abd Razak
  • Mazleena Salleh
  • Hein S Venter

Abstract

Comprehension of the statistical and structural mechanisms governing human dynamics in online interaction plays a pivotal role in online user identification, online profile development, and recommender systems. However, building a characteristic model of human dynamics on the Internet involves a complete analysis of the variations in human activity patterns, which is a complex process. This complexity is inherent in human dynamics and has not been extensively studied to reveal the structural composition of human behavior. A typical method of anatomizing such a complex system is viewing all independent interconnectivity that constitutes the complexity. An examination of the various dimensions of human communication pattern in online interactions is presented in this paper. The study employed reliable server-side web data from 31 known users to explore characteristics of human-driven communications. Various machine-learning techniques were explored. The results revealed that each individual exhibited a relatively consistent, unique behavioral signature and that the logistic regression model and model tree can be used to accurately distinguish online users. These results are applicable to one-to-one online user identification processes, insider misuse investigation processes, and online profiling in various areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Ikuesan Richard Adeyemi & Shukor Abd Razak & Mazleena Salleh & Hein S Venter, 2016. "Observing Consistency in Online Communication Patterns for User Re-Identification," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-27, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0166930
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166930
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0166930
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0166930&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0166930?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hao Liao & An Zeng & Rui Xiao & Zhuo-Ming Ren & Duan-Bing Chen & Yi-Cheng Zhang, 2014. "Ranking Reputation and Quality in Online Rating Systems," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(5), pages 1-7, May.
    2. Hao Liao & Rui Xiao & Giulio Cimini & Matúš Medo, 2014. "Network-Driven Reputation in Online Scientific Communities," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Albert-László Barabási, 2005. "The origin of bursts and heavy tails in human dynamics," Nature, Nature, vol. 435(7039), pages 207-211, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guan-Nan Wang & Hui Gao & Lian Chen & Dennis N A Mensah & Yan Fu, 2015. "Predicting Positive and Negative Relationships in Large Social Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, June.
    2. Leilei Wu & Zhuoming Ren & Xiao-Long Ren & Jianlin Zhang & Linyuan Lü, 2018. "Eliminating the Effect of Rating Bias on Reputation Systems," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-11, February.
    3. Lu, Xi & Mo, Hongming & Deng, Yong, 2015. "An evidential opinion dynamics model based on heterogeneous social influential power," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 98-107.
    4. Simon DeDeo, 2016. "Conflict and Computation on Wikipedia: A Finite-State Machine Analysis of Editor Interactions," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-23, July.
    5. Zhou, Bin & Xie, Jia-Rong & Yan, Xiao-Yong & Wang, Nianxin & Wang, Bing-Hong, 2017. "A model of task-deletion mechanism based on the priority queueing system of Barabási," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 466(C), pages 415-421.
    6. Chen, Ning & Zhu, Xuzhen & Chen, Yanyan, 2019. "Information spreading on complex networks with general group distribution," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 523(C), pages 671-676.
    7. Zhenpeng Li & Xijin Tang & Zhenjie Hong, 2022. "Collective attention dynamic induced by novelty decay," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 95(8), pages 1-11, August.
    8. Wu, Ying-Ying & Guo, Qiang & Liu, Jian-Guo & Zhang, Yi-Cheng, 2018. "Effect of the initial configuration for user–object reputation systems," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 502(C), pages 288-294.
    9. Koen Zwet & Ana I. Barros & Tom M. Engers & Peter M. A. Sloot, 2022. "Emergence of protests during the COVID-19 pandemic: quantitative models to explore the contributions of societal conditions," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-11, December.
    10. B Ian Hutchins & Xin Yuan & James M Anderson & George M Santangelo, 2016. "Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A New Metric That Uses Citation Rates to Measure Influence at the Article Level," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-25, September.
    11. Qianqian Liu & Qun Wang, 2017. "A comparative study on uncooperative search models in survivor search and rescue," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 89(2), pages 843-857, November.
    12. Kota Yamada & Atsunori Kanemura, 2020. "Simulating bout-and-pause patterns with reinforcement learning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-21, November.
    13. Muaz Niazi & Amir Hussain, 2011. "Agent-based computing from multi-agent systems to agent-based models: a visual survey," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 89(2), pages 479-499, November.
    14. Bent Flyvbjerg & Alexander Budzier & Daniel Lunn, 2021. "Regression to the tail: Why the Olympics blow up," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(2), pages 233-260, March.
    15. Pan, Junshan & Hu, Hanping & Liu, Ying, 2014. "Human behavior during Flash Crowd in web surfing," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 413(C), pages 212-219.
    16. Chen, Ling-Jiao & Gao, Jian, 2018. "A trust-based recommendation method using network diffusion processes," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 506(C), pages 679-691.
    17. Michael Platzer & Thomas Reutterer, 2016. "Ticking Away the Moments: Timing Regularity Helps to Better Predict Customer Activity," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(5), pages 779-799, September.
    18. Gui, Jun & Zheng, Zeyu & Fu, Dianzheng & Fu, Yang & Liu, Zhi, 2021. "Long-term correlations and multifractality of toll-free calls in China," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 567(C).
    19. Zhao, Huiyan & Zhang, Chongqi, 2019. "Minimum distance parameter estimation for SDEs with small α-stable noises," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 301-311.
    20. Zhenpeng Li & Luo Li, 2023. "The Generation Mechanism of Degree Distribution with Power Exponent >2 and the Growth of Edges in Temporal Social Networks," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-11, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0166930. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.