IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0159727.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Early Fungicidal Activity as a Candidate Surrogate Endpoint for All-Cause Mortality in Cryptococcal Meningitis: A Systematic Review of the Evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Jairo M Montezuma-Rusca
  • John H Powers
  • Dean Follmann
  • Jing Wang
  • Brigit Sullivan
  • Peter R Williamson

Abstract

Background: Cryptococcal meningitis (CM) is a leading cause of HIV-associated mortality. In clinical trials evaluating treatments for CM, biomarkers of early fungicidal activity (EFA) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) have been proposed as candidate surrogate endpoints for all- cause mortality (ACM). However, there has been no systematic evaluation of the group-level or trial-level evidence for EFA as a candidate surrogate endpoint for ACM. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of randomized trials in treatment of CM to evaluate available evidence for EFA measured as culture negativity at 2 weeks/10 weeks and slope of EFA as candidate surrogate endpoints for ACM. We performed sensitivity analysis on superiority trials and high quality trials as determined by Cochrane measures of trial bias. Results: Twenty-seven trials including 2854 patients met inclusion criteria. Mean ACM was 15.8% at 2 weeks and 27.0% at 10 weeks with no overall significant difference between test and control groups. There was a statistically significant group-level correlation between average EFA and ACM at 10 weeks but not at 2 weeks. There was also no statistically significant group-level correlation between CFU culture negativity at 2weeks/10weeks or average EFA slope at 10 weeks. A statistically significant trial-level correlation was identified between EFA slope and ACM at 2 weeks, but is likely misleading, as there was no treatment effect on ACM. Conclusions: Mortality remains high in short time periods in CM clinical trials. Using published data and Institute of Medicine criteria, evidence for use of EFA as a surrogate endpoint for ACM is insufficient and could provide misleading results from clinical trials. ACM should be used as a primary endpoint evaluating treatments for cryptococcal meningitis.

Suggested Citation

  • Jairo M Montezuma-Rusca & John H Powers & Dean Follmann & Jing Wang & Brigit Sullivan & Peter R Williamson, 2016. "Early Fungicidal Activity as a Candidate Surrogate Endpoint for All-Cause Mortality in Cryptococcal Meningitis: A Systematic Review of the Evidence," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-15, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0159727
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159727
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0159727
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0159727&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0159727?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael P. Fay & Barry I. Graubard, 2001. "Small-Sample Adjustments for Wald-Type Tests Using Sandwich Estimators," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(4), pages 1198-1206, December.
    2. Arturo Casadevall & Liise-anne Pirofski, 2014. "Microbiology: Ditch the term pathogen," Nature, Nature, vol. 516(7530), pages 165-166, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barry I. Graubard & Thomas R. Fears, 2005. "Standard Errors for Attributable Risk for Simple and Complex Sample Designs," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 61(3), pages 847-855, September.
    2. Alexander Robitzsch, 2023. "Linking Error in the 2PL Model," J, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-27, January.
    3. Ji-Hyun Lee & Michael J Schell & Richard Roetzheim, 2009. "Analysis of Group Randomized Trials with Multiple Binary Endpoints and Small Number of Groups," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(10), pages 1-9, October.
    4. Haiyan Wang & Michael Akritas, 2010. "Inference from heteroscedastic functional data," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 149-168.
    5. Galea, Manuel & de Castro, Mário, 2017. "Robust inference in a linear functional model with replications using the t distribution," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 134-145.
    6. Hsiu-Ting Yu & Mark Rooij, 2013. "Model Selection for the Trend Vector Model," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 30(3), pages 338-369, October.
    7. Masahiko Gosho & Hisashi Noma & Kazushi Maruo, 2021. "Practical Review and Comparison of Modified Covariance Estimators for Linear Mixed Models in Small‐sample Longitudinal Studies with Missing Data," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 89(3), pages 550-572, December.
    8. Bing Lu & John S. Preisser & Bahjat F. Qaqish & Chirayath Suchindran & Shrikant I. Bangdiwala & Mark Wolfson, 2007. "A Comparison of Two Bias-Corrected Covariance Estimators for Generalized Estimating Equations," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(3), pages 935-941, September.
    9. Olli Saarela & David A. Stephens & Erica E. M. Moodie & Marina B. Klein, 2015. "On Bayesian estimation of marginal structural models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(2), pages 279-288, June.
    10. Tang, Nian-Sheng & Tang, Man-Lai & Qiu, Shi-Fang, 2008. "Testing the equality of proportions for correlated otolaryngologic data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(7), pages 3719-3729, March.
    11. Slawa Rokicki & Jessica Cohen & Gunther Fink & Joshua Salomon & Mary Beth Landrum, 2018. "Inference with difference-in-differences with a small number of groups: a review, simulation study and empirical application using SHARE data," CHaRMS Working Papers 18-01, Centre for HeAlth Research at the Management School (CHaRMS).
    12. Steven Teerenstra & Bing Lu & John S. Preisser & Theo van Achterberg & George F. Borm, 2010. "Sample Size Considerations for GEE Analyses of Three-Level Cluster Randomized Trials," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(4), pages 1230-1237, December.
    13. Philip M. Westgate & Woodrow W. Burchett, 2017. "A Comparison of Correlation Structure Selection Penalties for Generalized Estimating Equations," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(4), pages 344-353, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0159727. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.