IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0158678.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and Validation of a Self-Report Measure of Mentalizing: The Reflective Functioning Questionnaire

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Fonagy
  • Patrick Luyten
  • Alesia Moulton-Perkins
  • Ya-Wen Lee
  • Fiona Warren
  • Susan Howard
  • Rosanna Ghinai
  • Pasco Fearon
  • Benedicte Lowyck

Abstract

Reflective functioning or mentalizing is the capacity to interpret both the self and others in terms of internal mental states such as feelings, wishes, goals, desires, and attitudes. This paper is part of a series of papers outlining the development and psychometric features of a new self-report measure, the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (RFQ), designed to provide an easy to administer self-report measure of mentalizing. We describe the development and initial validation of the RFQ in three studies. Study 1 focuses on the development of the RFQ, its factor structure and construct validity in a sample of patients with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) and Eating Disorder (ED) (n = 108) and normal controls (n = 295). Study 2 aims to replicate these findings in a fresh sample of 129 patients with personality disorder and 281 normal controls. Study 3 addresses the relationship between the RFQ, parental reflective functioning and infant attachment status as assessed with the Strange Situation Procedure (SSP) in a sample of 136 community mothers and their infants. In both Study 1 and 2, confirmatory factor analyses yielded two factors assessing Certainty (RFQ_C) and Uncertainty (RFQ_U) about the mental states of self and others. These two factors were relatively distinct, invariant across clinical and non-clinical samples, had satisfactory internal consistency and test–retest stability, and were largely unrelated to demographic features. The scales discriminated between patients and controls, and were significantly and in theoretically predicted ways correlated with measures of empathy, mindfulness and perspective-taking, and with both self-reported and clinician-reported measures of borderline personality features and other indices of maladaptive personality functioning. Furthermore, the RFQ scales were associated with levels of parental reflective functioning, which in turn predicted infant attachment status in the SSP. Overall, this study lends preliminary support for the RFQ as a screening measure of reflective functioning. Further research is needed, however, to investigate in more detail the psychometric qualities of the RFQ.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Fonagy & Patrick Luyten & Alesia Moulton-Perkins & Ya-Wen Lee & Fiona Warren & Susan Howard & Rosanna Ghinai & Pasco Fearon & Benedicte Lowyck, 2016. "Development and Validation of a Self-Report Measure of Mentalizing: The Reflective Functioning Questionnaire," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(7), pages 1-28, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0158678
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158678
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0158678
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0158678&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0158678?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard HERMIDA, 2015. "The problem of allowing correlated errors in structural equation modeling: concerns and considerations," Computational Methods in Social Sciences (CMSS), "Nicolae Titulescu" University of Bucharest, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 3(1), pages 05-17, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marc Baertschi & Alessandra Costanza & Alessandra Canuto & Kerstin Weber, 2018. "The Function of Personality in Suicidal Ideation from the Perspective of the Interpersonal-Psychological Theory of Suicide," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Abuelhaj, Tareq & Gassmann, Franziska & O'Donoghue, Cathal, 2018. "Price opinion data in subsidized economies: Empirical evidence from Iraq," MERIT Working Papers 2018-033, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    3. Marek Kośny & Maria Piotrowska, 2019. "Economic Resourcefulness: Definition and Modeling," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 144(1), pages 425-449, July.
    4. Gyeong-Suk Jeon & Sun-Ju You & Myo-Gyeong Kim & Yoo-Mi Kim & Sung-Il Cho, 2019. "Psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory in Korean homecare workers for older adults," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-12, August.
    5. Eirini C. Drakou & Nicholas I. Symeonidis, 2023. "Towards a Holistic Approach to Economic Development: Incorporating Institutional and Schumpeterian Economics into Development Dynamics," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 132-158.
    6. Dipankar Biswas & Rajib Sarkar, 2023. "Rise of marigold floriculture, a new stirring door walk through economic, social, and entertainment factors in Eastern India: a combined approach of multi-group structural equation modeling and cluste," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 137-172, February.
    7. Ayikwa Lutete Christian & De Jager Johan W & Van Zyl Dion, 2019. "Enhancing the Theory of Planned Behaviour by Incorporating Social Marketing Behavioural Enhancers: A First VS Second Order Confirmatory Factor Analysis Approach," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 11(1), pages 139-151.
    8. Gerdin, Jonas & Englund, Hans, 2022. "Vertical, horizontal, and self control in academia: Survey evidence on their diverging effects on perceived researcher autonomy and identity," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(5).
    9. Bjørnson Lunke, Erik, 2023. "Accessibility in a multi-ethnic city: Residential trade-offs among first-time parents," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    10. Giulia Raimondi & Claudio Imperatori & Mariantonietta Fabbricatore & David Lester & Michela Balsamo & Marco Innamorati, 2021. "Evaluating the Factor Structure of the Emotion Dysregulation Scale-Short (EDS-s): A Preliminary Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-10, December.
    11. Simon M. Rice & David Kealy & Zac E. Seidler & John L. Oliffe & Ronald F. Levant & John S. Ogrodniczuk, 2020. "Male-Type and Prototypal Depression Trajectories for Men Experiencing Mental Health Problems," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-15, October.
    12. Sachin Batra, 2020. "Developing a Conceptual and Measurement Framework of Organizational Socialization, Authentic Leadership, and Affective Commitment for Construction Professionals," Jindal Journal of Business Research, , vol. 9(2), pages 176-187, December.
    13. Sai-fu Fung & Annis Lai Chu Fung, 2020. "Development and evaluation of the psychometric properties of a brief parenting scale (PS-7) for the parents of adolescents," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0158678. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.