IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0154736.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characterizing Floral Symmetry in the Core Goodeniaceae with Geometric Morphometrics

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew G Gardner
  • Jonathan N Fitz Gerald
  • John Menz
  • Kelly A Shepherd
  • Dianella G Howarth
  • Rachel S Jabaily

Abstract

Core Goodeniaceae is a clade of ~330 species primarily distributed in Australia. Considerable variation in flower morphology exists within this group and we aim to use geometric morphometrics to characterize this variation across the two major subclades: Scaevola sensu lato (s.l.) and Goodenia s.l., the latter of which was hypothesized to exhibit greater variability in floral symmetry form. We test the hypothesis that floral morphological variation can be adequately characterized by our morphometric approach, and that discrete groups of floral symmetry morphologies exist, which broadly correlate with subjectively determined groups. From 335 images of 44 species in the Core Goodeniaceae, two principal components were computed that describe >98% of variation in all datasets. Increasing values of PC1 ventralize the dorsal petals (increasing the angle between them), whereas increasing values of PC2 primarily ventralize the lateral petals (decreasing the angle between them). Manipulation of these two morphological “axes” alone was sufficient to recreate any of the general floral symmetry patterns in the Core Goodeniaceae. Goodenia s.l. exhibits greater variance than Scaevola s.l. in PC1 and PC2, and has a significantly lower mean value for PC1. Clustering clearly separates fan-flowers (with dorsal petals at least 120° separated) from the others, whereas the distinction between pseudo-radial and bilabiate clusters is less clear and may form a continuum rather than two distinct groups. Transitioning from the average fan-flower to the average non-fan-flower is described almost exclusively by PC1, whereas PC2 partially describes the transition between bilabiate and pseudo-radial morphologies. Our geometric morphometric method accurately models Core Goodeniaceae floral symmetry diversity.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew G Gardner & Jonathan N Fitz Gerald & John Menz & Kelly A Shepherd & Dianella G Howarth & Rachel S Jabaily, 2016. "Characterizing Floral Symmetry in the Core Goodeniaceae with Geometric Morphometrics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-22, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0154736
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154736
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0154736
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0154736&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0154736?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vincenzo Viscosi & Andrea Cardini, 2011. "Leaf Morphology, Taxonomy and Geometric Morphometrics: A Simplified Protocol for Beginners," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(10), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Justen B. Whittall & Scott A. Hodges, 2007. "Pollinator shifts drive increasingly long nectar spurs in columbine flowers," Nature, Nature, vol. 447(7145), pages 706-709, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aleix Alcacer & Irene Epifanio & M Victoria Ibáñez & Amelia Simó & Alfredo Ballester, 2020. "A data-driven classification of 3D foot types by archetypal shapes based on landmarks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, January.
    2. Irene Epifanio & María Victoria Ibáñez & Amelia Simó, 2018. "Archetypal shapes based on landmarks and extension to handle missing data," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 12(3), pages 705-735, September.
    3. Luis Gutiérrez & Ramsés H. Mena & Carlos Díaz-Avalos, 2020. "Linear models for statistical shape analysis based on parametrized closed curves," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(3), pages 1213-1229, June.
    4. José Antonio Muñoz-Reyes & Marta Iglesias-Julios & Miguel Pita & Enrique Turiegano, 2015. "Facial Features: What Women Perceive as Attractive and What Men Consider Attractive," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    5. Vitale Nuzzo & Antonio Gatto & Giuseppe Montanaro, 2022. "Morphological Characterization of Some Local Varieties of Fig ( Ficus carica L.) Cultivated in Southern Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-22, November.
    6. Amro Daboul & Tatyana Ivanovska & Robin Bülow & Reiner Biffar & Andrea Cardini, 2018. "Procrustes-based geometric morphometrics on MRI images: An example of inter-operator bias in 3D landmarks and its impact on big datasets," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-20, May.
    7. Olalekan Agbolade & Azree Nazri & Razali Yaakob & Abdul Azim Ghani & Yoke Kqueen Cheah, 2020. "Morphometric approach to 3D soft-tissue craniofacial analysis and classification of ethnicity, sex, and age," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-24, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0154736. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.