IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0144344.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Participation in Complex and Social Everyday Activities Six Years after Stroke: Predictors for Return to Pre-Stroke Level

Author

Listed:
  • Avvai Singam
  • Charlotte Ytterberg
  • Kerstin Tham
  • Lena von Koch

Abstract

Background: Long-term disability following stroke can lead to participation restrictions in complex and social everyday activities, yet information is lacking on to what extent stroke survivors return to their pre-stroke levels of participation. Objectives: The objectives of this study were to investigate the level of participation in complex and social everyday activities 6 years after stroke, to compare this with pre-stroke participation and to identify predictors of returning to pre-stroke levels of participation. Method: All patients admitted to Karolinska University Hospital's stroke units during a 1-year period were eligible to participate and 349 patients were recruited. Assessments were made at base-line, 3 months and 6 years using self-reported outcome measures. Participation was assessed using the Frenchay Activities Index (FAI). The 6-year score for each participant was compared to the pre-stroke score, both for the total score and for each domain (domestic chores, leisure/work and outdoor activities). Predictors of having the same or better level of participation at 6 years were identified using logistic regression. Results: At 6 years, 121 participants were followed up, 166 were deceased, 44 declined to take part and 18 could not be traced. At 6 years 84% could be described as active (FAI≥15). The same level of participation or better than pre-stroke was found in 35% of participants, in 65% the level was lower. Similar predictors were identified for achieving the same or better level of participation at 6 years for FAI total and the three domains; ability to walk without aids and a lower age at stroke onset, and perceived mobility, participation and recovery at 3 months. Conclusion: Six years after stroke, 35% of participants had the same or better level of participation as pre-stroke. Rehabilitation after stroke to improve walking ability and participation might improve long-term participation in complex and social everyday activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Avvai Singam & Charlotte Ytterberg & Kerstin Tham & Lena von Koch, 2015. "Participation in Complex and Social Everyday Activities Six Years after Stroke: Predictors for Return to Pre-Stroke Level," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-12, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0144344
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144344
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0144344
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0144344&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0144344?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sheyda Ghanbari Ghoshchi & Sara De Angelis & Giovanni Morone & Monica Panigazzi & Benedetta Persechino & Marco Tramontano & Edda Capodaglio & Pierluigi Zoccolotti & Stefano Paolucci & Marco Iosa, 2020. "Return to Work and Quality of Life after Stroke in Italy: A Study on the Efficacy of Technologically Assisted Neurorehabilitation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-12, July.
    2. Charlotte Ytterberg & Hanne Kaae Kristensen & Malin Tistad & Lena von Koch, 2020. "Factors related to met needs for rehabilitation 6 years after stroke," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, January.
    3. Annie Palstam & Astrid Sjödin & Katharina Stibrant Sunnerhagen, 2019. "Participation and autonomy five years after stroke: A longitudinal observational study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-13, July.
    4. Isabela Matos & Adriana Fernandes & Iara Maso & Jamary Oliveira-Filho & Pedro Antônio de Jesus & Helena Fraga-Maia & Elen Beatriz Pinto, 2020. "Investigating predictors of community integration in individuals after stroke in a residential setting: A longitutinal study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-11, May.
    5. Shamay S. M. Ng & Lily Y. W. Ho & Nga-Huen Chan & Tai-Wa Liu & Billy So, 2022. "Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Oxford Participation and Activities Questionnaire in People with Stroke," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-11, November.
    6. Emma Westerlind & Hanna C Persson & Katharina S Sunnerhagen, 2017. "Return to Work after a Stroke in Working Age Persons; A Six-Year Follow Up," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, January.
    7. Maya Kylén & Lena Von Koch & Hélène Pessah-Rasmussen & Elizabeth Marcheschi & Charlotte Ytterberg & Ann Heylighen & Marie Elf, 2019. "The Importance of the Built Environment in Person-Centred Rehabilitation at Home: Study Protocol," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-15, July.
    8. Aviva Beit Yosef & Nirit Refaeli & Jeremy M. Jacobs & Jeffrey Shames & Yafit Gilboa, 2022. "Exploring the Multidimensional Participation of Adults Living in the Community in the Chronic Phase following Acquired Brain Injury," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-19, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0144344. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.