IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0227867.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors related to met needs for rehabilitation 6 years after stroke

Author

Listed:
  • Charlotte Ytterberg
  • Hanne Kaae Kristensen
  • Malin Tistad
  • Lena von Koch

Abstract

Introduction: Research on stroke rehabilitation mainly concerns the first year of recovery, and there is a lack of knowledge regarding long-term rehabilitation needs and associated factors. Aim: The aim was to explore the perceived needs for rehabilitation services of people six years after stroke and factors associated with having rehabilitation services needs met. Methods: The study was a 6-year follow up of a prospective study on the rehabilitation process after stroke. Data on perceived needs for rehabilitation, personal factors, disease specific factors, and patient-reported disability were collected through face-to-face interviews in the participants’ homes. Logistic regression models were created to explore associations between having rehabilitation services needs met in 11 problem areas (dependent variable) and the independent variables: involvement in decisions regarding care and treatment, sex, age, sense of coherence, self-defined level of private financing, stroke severity, frequency of social everyday activities, perceived impact of stroke, and life satisfaction. Results: The 121 participants had a mean age of 63 years at stroke onset and 58% were men. In all problem areas the majority (53–88%) reported having needs met at six years after stroke, however 47% reported unmet needs regarding fatigue and 45% regarding mobility. A lower perceived impact on participation was found to be associated with having rehabilitation services needs met in seven problem areas: mobility, falls, pain, fatigue, concentration, memory, and sight. The strongest association for having needs met was found for the independent variable, involvement in care and treatment, within the three problem areas mobility, falls, and speaking. Conclusion: In a long-term perspective, there were several modifiable factors associated with having rehabilitation services needs met. The most prominent were perceived involvement in care and treatment, and perceived participation. These factors had a stronger association with having rehabilitation services needs met than disease specific factors six years after stroke.

Suggested Citation

  • Charlotte Ytterberg & Hanne Kaae Kristensen & Malin Tistad & Lena von Koch, 2020. "Factors related to met needs for rehabilitation 6 years after stroke," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0227867
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227867
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0227867
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0227867&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0227867?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Avvai Singam & Charlotte Ytterberg & Kerstin Tham & Lena von Koch, 2015. "Participation in Complex and Social Everyday Activities Six Years after Stroke: Predictors for Return to Pre-Stroke Level," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Janne Marieke Veerbeek & Erwin van Wegen & Roland van Peppen & Philip Jan van der Wees & Erik Hendriks & Marc Rietberg & Gert Kwakkel, 2014. "What Is the Evidence for Physical Therapy Poststroke? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-1, February.
    3. L. Aubree Shay & Jennifer Elston Lafata, 2015. "Where Is the Evidence? A Systematic Review of Shared Decision Making and Patient Outcomes," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 35(1), pages 114-131, January.
    4. Marie Elf & Gunilla Eriksson & Sverker Johansson & Lena von Koch & Charlotte Ytterberg, 2016. "Self-Reported Fatigue and Associated Factors Six Years after Stroke," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-9, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sumayah Rodenburg-Vandenbussche & Arwen H Pieterse & Pieter M Kroonenberg & Isabelle Scholl & Trudy van der Weijden & Gre P M Luyten & Roy F P M Kruitwagen & Henk den Ouden & Ingrid V E Carlier & Iren, 2015. "Dutch Translation and Psychometric Testing of the 9-Item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) and Shared Decision Making Questionnaire-Physician Version (SDM-Q-Doc) in Primary and Secondary ," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, July.
    2. Underman, Kelly & Hirshfield, Laura E., 2016. "Detached concern?: Emotional socialization in twenty-first century medical education," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 94-101.
    3. Aurélien Hugues & Julie Di Marco & Shams Ribault & Hugo Ardaillon & Perrine Janiaud & Yufeng Xue & Jin Zhu & Jennifer Pires & Hooman Khademi & Laura Rubio & Paloma Hernandez Bernal & Yeliz Bahar & Had, 2019. "Limited evidence of physical therapy on balance after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-22, August.
    4. Anders Broström & Bengt Fridlund & Berith Hedberg & Per Nilsen & Martin Ulander, 2017. "Communication between patients with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome and healthcare personnel during the initial visit to a continuous positive airway pressure clinic," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3-4), pages 568-577, February.
    5. Els Knippenberg & Ilse Lamers & Annick Timmermans & Annemie Spooren, 2021. "Motivation, Usability, and Credibility of an Intelligent Activity-Based Client-Centred Training System to Improve Functional Performance in Neurological Rehabilitation: An Exploratory Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-16, July.
    6. David Bruce Matchar & Wei Xuan Lai & Ashish Kumar & John Pastor Ansah & Yeuk Fan Ng, 2023. "A Causal View of the Role and Potential Limitations of Capitation in Promoting Whole Health System Performance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-13, March.
    7. Shamay S. M. Ng & Lily Y. W. Ho & Nga-Huen Chan & Tai-Wa Liu & Billy So, 2022. "Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Oxford Participation and Activities Questionnaire in People with Stroke," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-11, November.
    8. Maria Tereza Artero Prado Dantas & Deborah Cristina Gonçalves Luiz Fernani & Talita Dias da Silva & Iramaia Salomão Alexandre de Assis & Augusto Cesinando de Carvalho & Sidney Benedito Silva & Luiz Ca, 2023. "Gait Training with Functional Electrical Stimulation Improves Mobility in People Post-Stroke," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(9), pages 1-14, May.
    9. Maya Kylén & Ulla-Karin Schön & Hélène Pessah-Rasmussen & Marie Elf, 2022. "Patient Participation and the Environment: A Scoping Review of Instruments," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-17, February.
    10. Annie Palstam & Astrid Sjödin & Katharina Stibrant Sunnerhagen, 2019. "Participation and autonomy five years after stroke: A longitudinal observational study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-13, July.
    11. Footman, Katy, 2024. "The illusion of treatment choice in abortion care: A qualitative study of comparative care experiences in England and Wales," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    12. Francesco Baratta & Francesco Angelico & Maria Del Ben, 2023. "Challenges in Improving Adherence to Diet and Drug Treatment in Hypercholesterolemia Patients," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(10), pages 1-12, May.
    13. Michael Brown & Anna Higgins & Juliet MacArthur, 2020. "Transition from child to adult health services: A qualitative study of the views and experiences of families of young adults with intellectual disabilities," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(1-2), pages 195-207, January.
    14. Chiara Arienti & Stefano G Lazzarini & Alex Pollock & Stefano Negrini, 2019. "Rehabilitation interventions for improving balance following stroke: An overview of systematic reviews," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-23, July.
    15. Caroline Winters & Gert Kwakkel & Rinske Nijland & Erwin van Wegen & EXPLICIT-stroke consortium, 2016. "When Does Return of Voluntary Finger Extension Occur Post-Stroke? A Prospective Cohort Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-12, August.
    16. Mara Gorli & Serena Barello, 2021. "Patient Centredness, Values, Equity and Sustainability: Professional, Organizational and Institutional Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-7, November.
    17. Rami H. Al-Rifai & Iffat Elbarazi & Nasloon Ali & Tom Loney & Abderrahim Oulhaj & Luai A. Ahmed, 2020. "Knowledge and Preference Towards Mode of Delivery among Pregnant Women in the United Arab Emirates: The Mutaba’ah Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-11, December.
    18. Meron Hirpa & Tinsay Woreta & Hilena Addis & Sosena Kebede, 2020. "What matters to patients? A timely question for value-based care," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-16, July.
    19. Yuko Goto & Hisayuki Miura, 2022. "Validation of the Novel Interprofessional Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire to Facilitate Multidisciplinary Team Building in Patient-Centered Care," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-13, November.
    20. Reem M. Alwhaibi & Noha F. Mahmoud & Hoda M. Zakaria & Wanees M. Badawy & Mahmoud Y. Elzanaty & Walaa M. Ragab & Maher S. Benjadid & Nisreen N. Al Awaji & Hager R. Elserougy, 2020. "A Comparative Study on the Effect of Task Specific Training on Right Versus Left Chronic Stroke Patients," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-11, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0227867. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.