IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i14p5233-d387027.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Return to Work and Quality of Life after Stroke in Italy: A Study on the Efficacy of Technologically Assisted Neurorehabilitation

Author

Listed:
  • Sheyda Ghanbari Ghoshchi

    (IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Via Ardeatina 306, 00179 Rome, Italy
    Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
    These two authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Sara De Angelis

    (IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Via Ardeatina 306, 00179 Rome, Italy
    These two authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Giovanni Morone

    (IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Via Ardeatina 306, 00179 Rome, Italy)

  • Monica Panigazzi

    (Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCSS, Occupational Therapy and Ergonomics Unit, 27040 Montescano, Italy
    Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCSS, Occupational Therapy and Ergonomics Unit, 27100 Pavia, Italy)

  • Benedetta Persechino

    (Italian Workers’ Compensation Authority (INAIL), Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene, Monte Porzio Catone, 00078 Rome, Italy)

  • Marco Tramontano

    (IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Via Ardeatina 306, 00179 Rome, Italy
    Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome “Foro Italico”, Interuniversity Centre of Bioengineering of the Human Neuromusculoskeletal System, 00135 Rome, Italy)

  • Edda Capodaglio

    (Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCSS, Occupational Therapy and Ergonomics Unit, 27100 Pavia, Italy)

  • Pierluigi Zoccolotti

    (IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Via Ardeatina 306, 00179 Rome, Italy
    Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy)

  • Stefano Paolucci

    (IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Via Ardeatina 306, 00179 Rome, Italy)

  • Marco Iosa

    (IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Via Ardeatina 306, 00179 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

Cerebrovascular diseases, including stroke, are historically considered diseases of old adults so only in a few studies has “return to work” (RTW) been considered as an index of rehabilitative outcome. At the moment, data on RTW in patients with stroke are highly variable: four different reviews reported the following ranges: 11–85%, 19–73%, 22–53%, and 40–45%. The absence of re-integration to work after a stroke is shown to be associated with an increase of cardiac disorders and depression, with a higher level of mortality, with social isolation and with insufficient adaptive skills. The aim of this study was to verify the effectiveness of technological treatment, performed with optic (SonicHand) and wearable (Riablo™) systems providing auditory and visual biofeedback, on RTW in patients with stroke. RTW was found to be associated with a higher independence in the activities of daily living (assessed by the Modified Barthel Index). No significant differences were found between technological versus conventional rehabilitation in terms of RTW, despite the former showing a higher odds ratio than the latter (OR = 9 vs. 6). Assistive devices were mainly used in patients who had not returned to work. Finally, quality of life was found higher in those patients who returned to work with the same conditions (work duties and time) as before stroke.

Suggested Citation

  • Sheyda Ghanbari Ghoshchi & Sara De Angelis & Giovanni Morone & Monica Panigazzi & Benedetta Persechino & Marco Tramontano & Edda Capodaglio & Pierluigi Zoccolotti & Stefano Paolucci & Marco Iosa, 2020. "Return to Work and Quality of Life after Stroke in Italy: A Study on the Efficacy of Technologically Assisted Neurorehabilitation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-12, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:14:p:5233-:d:387027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/14/5233/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/14/5233/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Avvai Singam & Charlotte Ytterberg & Kerstin Tham & Lena von Koch, 2015. "Participation in Complex and Social Everyday Activities Six Years after Stroke: Predictors for Return to Pre-Stroke Level," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-12, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chong-Chi Chiu & Hsiu-Fen Lin & Ching-Huang Lin & Hong-Tai Chang & Hong-Hsi Hsien & Kuo-Wei Hung & Sheng-Li Tung & Hon-Yi Shi, 2021. "Multidisciplinary Care after Acute Care for Stroke: A Prospective Comparison between a Multidisciplinary Post-Acute Care Group and a Standard Group Matched by Propensity Score," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-11, July.
    2. Alba Aza & Miguel Á. Verdugo & María Begoña Orgaz & Antonio M. Amor & María Fernández, 2021. "Predictive Factors of Self-Reported Quality of Life in Acquired Brain Injury: One-Year Follow-Up," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-19, January.
    3. Roxana Steliana Miclaus & Nadinne Roman & Ramona Henter & Silviu Caloian, 2021. "Lower Extremity Rehabilitation in Patients with Post-Stroke Sequelae through Virtual Reality Associated with Mirror Therapy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-14, March.
    4. José-María Figueredo & Cristina García-Ael & Andrea Gragnano & Gabriela Topa, 2020. "Well-Being at Work after Return to Work (RTW): A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-27, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shamay S. M. Ng & Lily Y. W. Ho & Nga-Huen Chan & Tai-Wa Liu & Billy So, 2022. "Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Oxford Participation and Activities Questionnaire in People with Stroke," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-11, November.
    2. Annie Palstam & Astrid Sjödin & Katharina Stibrant Sunnerhagen, 2019. "Participation and autonomy five years after stroke: A longitudinal observational study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-13, July.
    3. Charlotte Ytterberg & Hanne Kaae Kristensen & Malin Tistad & Lena von Koch, 2020. "Factors related to met needs for rehabilitation 6 years after stroke," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, January.
    4. Emma Westerlind & Hanna C Persson & Katharina S Sunnerhagen, 2017. "Return to Work after a Stroke in Working Age Persons; A Six-Year Follow Up," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, January.
    5. Maya Kylén & Lena Von Koch & Hélène Pessah-Rasmussen & Elizabeth Marcheschi & Charlotte Ytterberg & Ann Heylighen & Marie Elf, 2019. "The Importance of the Built Environment in Person-Centred Rehabilitation at Home: Study Protocol," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-15, July.
    6. Isabela Matos & Adriana Fernandes & Iara Maso & Jamary Oliveira-Filho & Pedro Antônio de Jesus & Helena Fraga-Maia & Elen Beatriz Pinto, 2020. "Investigating predictors of community integration in individuals after stroke in a residential setting: A longitutinal study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-11, May.
    7. Aviva Beit Yosef & Nirit Refaeli & Jeremy M. Jacobs & Jeffrey Shames & Yafit Gilboa, 2022. "Exploring the Multidimensional Participation of Adults Living in the Community in the Chronic Phase following Acquired Brain Injury," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-19, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:14:p:5233-:d:387027. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.