IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0143616.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Introducing Computer-Based Testing in High-Stakes Exams in Higher Education: Results of a Field Experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Anja J Boevé
  • Rob R Meijer
  • Casper J Albers
  • Yta Beetsma
  • Roel J Bosker

Abstract

The introduction of computer-based testing in high-stakes examining in higher education is developing rather slowly due to institutional barriers (the need of extra facilities, ensuring test security) and teacher and student acceptance. From the existing literature it is unclear whether computer-based exams will result in similar results as paper-based exams and whether student acceptance can change as a result of administering computer-based exams. In this study, we compared results from a computer-based and paper-based exam in a sample of psychology students and found no differences in total scores across the two modes. Furthermore, we investigated student acceptance and change in acceptance of computer-based examining. After taking the computer-based exam, fifty percent of the students preferred paper-and-pencil exams over computer-based exams and about a quarter preferred a computer-based exam. We conclude that computer-based exam total scores are similar as paper-based exam scores, but that for the acceptance of high-stakes computer-based exams it is important that students practice and get familiar with this new mode of test administration.

Suggested Citation

  • Anja J Boevé & Rob R Meijer & Casper J Albers & Yta Beetsma & Roel J Bosker, 2015. "Introducing Computer-Based Testing in High-Stakes Exams in Higher Education: Results of a Field Experiment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-13, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0143616
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143616
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0143616
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0143616&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0143616?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Reem AlSufayan & Dina Abdel Salam El-Dakhs, 2023. "Achievement Emotions in Paper-Based Exams vs. Computer-Based Exams: The Case of a Private Saudi University," International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design (IJOPCD), IGI Global, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0143616. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.