IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jopcd0/v13y2023i1p1-21.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Achievement Emotions in Paper-Based Exams vs. Computer-Based Exams: The Case of a Private Saudi University

Author

Listed:
  • Reem AlSufayan

    (Prince Sultan University, Saudi Arabia)

  • Dina Abdel Salam El-Dakhs

    (Prince Sultan University, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

This study investigates the emotional experiences of undergraduate students when taking computer-based compared to traditional paper-based exams. The authors surveyed 144 students and conducted in-depth written interviews with 44 of them to gain a comprehensive understanding of their emotions and experiences. The findings revealed that students generally feel more positive emotions, such as enjoyment, hope, and pride during computer-based exams. Conversely, they experienced less anger, anxiety, and hopelessness compared to paper-based exams. However, they observed no significant differences in feelings of relief and shame between the two exam modes. The interview responses provided valuable insights into the reasons behind these emotions. Students found computer-based testing to be more efficient, user-friendly for language editing, and appreciated the auto-grading features. However, technical concerns were identified as a major challenge in this format. On the other hand, paper-based exams allowed students to avoid technical problems, draft their answers, and express ideas more effectively. Despite these advantages, students reported disliking the lengthiness of the written responses, the difficulty of editing, and the pressure of maintaining legible handwriting. Overall, this study sheds light on the emotional experiences of students in different exam formats, helping educators make informed decisions to optimize testing environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Reem AlSufayan & Dina Abdel Salam El-Dakhs, 2023. "Achievement Emotions in Paper-Based Exams vs. Computer-Based Exams: The Case of a Private Saudi University," International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design (IJOPCD), IGI Global, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jopcd0:v:13:y:2023:i:1:p:1-21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJOPCD.322084
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anja J Boevé & Rob R Meijer & Casper J Albers & Yta Beetsma & Roel J Bosker, 2015. "Introducing Computer-Based Testing in High-Stakes Exams in Higher Education: Results of a Field Experiment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-13, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jopcd0:v:13:y:2023:i:1:p:1-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.