IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0142710.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial Targeting for Bovine Tuberculosis Control: Can the Locations of Infected Cattle Be Used to Find Infected Badgers?

Author

Listed:
  • Catherine M Smith
  • Sara H Downs
  • Andy Mitchell
  • Andrew C Hayward
  • Hannah Fry
  • Steven C Le Comber

Abstract

Bovine tuberculosis is a disease of historical importance to human health in the UK that remains a major animal health and economic issue. Control of the disease in cattle is complicated by the presence of a reservoir species, the Eurasian badger. In spite of uncertainty in the degree to which cattle disease results from transmission from badgers, and opposition from environmental groups, culling of badgers has been licenced in two large areas in England. Methods to limit culls to smaller areas that target badgers infected with TB whilst minimising the number of uninfected badgers culled is therefore of considerable interest. Here, we use historical data from a large-scale field trial of badger culling to assess two alternative hypothetical methods of targeting TB-infected badgers based on the distribution of cattle TB incidents: (i) a simple circular ‘ring cull’; and (ii) geographic profiling, a novel technique for spatial targeting of infectious disease control that predicts the locations of sources of infection based on the distribution of linked cases. Our results showed that both methods required coverage of very large areas to ensure a substantial proportion of infected badgers were removed, and would result in many uninfected badgers being culled. Geographic profiling, which accounts for clustering of infections in badger and cattle populations, produced a small but non-significant increase in the proportion of setts with TB-infected compared to uninfected badgers included in a cull. It also provided no overall improvement at targeting setts with infected badgers compared to the ring cull. Cattle TB incidents in this study were therefore insufficiently clustered around TB-infected badger setts to design an efficient spatially targeted cull; and this analysis provided no evidence to support a move towards spatially targeted badger culling policies for bovine TB control.

Suggested Citation

  • Catherine M Smith & Sara H Downs & Andy Mitchell & Andrew C Hayward & Hannah Fry & Steven C Le Comber, 2015. "Spatial Targeting for Bovine Tuberculosis Control: Can the Locations of Infected Cattle Be Used to Find Infected Badgers?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(11), pages 1-14, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0142710
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142710
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0142710
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0142710&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0142710?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Reader, Steven, 2000. "Using survival analysis to study spatial point patterns in geographical epidemiology," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 50(7-8), pages 985-1000, April.
    2. Christl A. Donnelly & Rosie Woodroffe & D. R. Cox & John Bourne & George Gettinby & Andrea M. Le Fevre & John P. McInerney & W. Ivan Morrison, 2003. "Impact of localized badger culling on tuberculosis incidence in British cattle," Nature, Nature, vol. 426(6968), pages 834-837, December.
    3. John I. Carruthers & Selma Lewis & Gerrit‐Jan Knaap & Robert N. Renner, 2010. "Coming undone: A spatial hazard analysis of urban form in American metropolitan areas," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 89(1), pages 65-88, March.
    4. Andrew J K Conlan & Trevelyan J McKinley & Katerina Karolemeas & Ellen Brooks Pollock & Anthony V Goodchild & Andrew P Mitchell & Colin P D Birch & Richard S Clifton-Hadley & James L N Wood, 2012. "Estimating the Hidden Burden of Bovine Tuberculosis in Great Britain," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(10), pages 1-14, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John I. Carruthers & Selma Hepp & Gerrit-Jan Knaap & Robert N. Renner, 2012. "The American Way of Land Use," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 35(3), pages 267-302, July.
    2. McClain, Verena & Waldorf, Brigitte, 2017. "Borrowing From The Demographer's Toolbox: Longitudinal Methods in Regional Science," Working papers 264970, Purdue University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    3. John I. Carruthers, 2012. "Land use regulation and regional form: a spatial mismatch?," Chapters, in: Roberta Capello & Tomaz Ponce Dentinho (ed.), Networks, Space and Competitiveness, chapter 8, pages 181-204, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Verena McClain & Brigitte S. Waldorf, 2021. "Longitudinal methods in regional science: a review," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 145-160, April.
    5. Ioannis Andrianakis & Ian R Vernon & Nicky McCreesh & Trevelyan J McKinley & Jeremy E Oakley & Rebecca N Nsubuga & Michael Goldstein & Richard G White, 2015. "Bayesian History Matching of Complex Infectious Disease Models Using Emulation: A Tutorial and a Case Study on HIV in Uganda," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, January.
    6. Tabassom Sedighi & Liz Varga, 2021. "Evaluating the Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Mechanism and Its Risk Factors in England’s Cattle Farms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-24, March.
    7. Daniel Arribas-Bel & Charles R Schmidt, 2013. "Self-Organizing Maps and the US Urban Spatial Structure," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 40(2), pages 362-371, April.
    8. Amélie Desvars-Larrive & Anna Elisabeth Vogl & Gavrila Amadea Puspitarani & Liuhuaying Yang & Anja Joachim & Annemarie Käsbohrer, 2024. "A One Health framework for exploring zoonotic interactions demonstrated through a case study," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    9. John I. Carruthers & Selma Lewis & Gerrit‐Jan Knaap & Robert N. Renner, 2010. "Coming undone: A spatial hazard analysis of urban form in American metropolitan areas," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 89(1), pages 65-88, March.
    10. Annelise Grube-Cavers & Zachary Patterson, 2015. "Urban rapid rail transit and gentrification in Canadian urban centres: A survival analysis approach," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(1), pages 178-194, January.
    11. Andrew J K Conlan & Ellen Brooks Pollock & Trevelyan J McKinley & Andrew P Mitchell & Gareth J Jones & Martin Vordermeier & James L N Wood, 2015. "Potential Benefits of Cattle Vaccination as a Supplementary Control for Bovine Tuberculosis," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-27, February.
    12. Robin N Thompson & Christopher A Gilligan & Nik J Cunniffe, 2018. "Control fast or control smart: When should invading pathogens be controlled?," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-21, February.
    13. John I. Carruthers & Natasha T. Duncan & Brigitte S. Waldorf, 2013. "Public And Subsidized Housing As A Platform For Becoming A United States Citizen," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(1), pages 60-90, February.
    14. Jan van Dijk, 2013. "Towards Risk-Based Test Protocols: Estimating the Contribution of Intensive Testing to the UK Bovine Tuberculosis Problem," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(5), pages 1-11, May.
    15. Helen E Jenkins & Rosie Woodroffe & Christl A Donnelly, 2010. "The Duration of the Effects of Repeated Widespread Badger Culling on Cattle Tuberculosis Following the Cessation of Culling," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(2), pages 1-7, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0142710. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.