IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v50y2000i7-8p985-1000.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using survival analysis to study spatial point patterns in geographical epidemiology

Author

Listed:
  • Reader, Steven

Abstract

The spatial K-function has become a well accepted method of investigating whether significant clustering can be detected in spatial point patterns. Unlike nearest neighbor-based methods, the K-function approach has the advantage of exploring spatial pattern across a range of spatial scales. However, K-functions still have a number of drawbacks. For instance, although K-functions are based on inter-event distances, they only use a count of the number of point events within successive distance bands. This represents data aggregation and information loss. Secondly, and perhaps more significantly, K-functions are based on a cumulative count of point events with distance. This feature raises the possibility that the investigation of pattern at different scales is compromised by the dependency of any one count to previous counts. This paper proposes a new approach to the analysis of spatial point patterns based upon survival analysis. Although typically used in the temporal domain, there is no reason why survival analysis cannot be applied to any positively-valued, continuous variable as well as time. In this paper, survival analysis is applied to the inter-event distance measures of bivariate spatial point patterns to investigate the 'random labeling' hypothesis. It is shown, through both a controlled data situation and empirical epidemiological applications, that such an approach may be a very useful complement to K-function analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Reader, Steven, 2000. "Using survival analysis to study spatial point patterns in geographical epidemiology," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 50(7-8), pages 985-1000, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:50:y:2000:i:7-8:p:985-1000
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(99)00349-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. John I. Carruthers & Selma Hepp & Gerrit-Jan Knaap & Robert N. Renner, 2012. "The American Way of Land Use," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 35(3), pages 267-302, July.
    2. John I. Carruthers, 2012. "Land use regulation and regional form: a spatial mismatch?," Chapters, in: Roberta Capello & Tomaz Ponce Dentinho (ed.), Networks, Space and Competitiveness, chapter 8, pages 181-204, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Verena McClain & Brigitte S. Waldorf, 2021. "Longitudinal methods in regional science: a review," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 145-160, April.
    4. Catherine M Smith & Sara H Downs & Andy Mitchell & Andrew C Hayward & Hannah Fry & Steven C Le Comber, 2015. "Spatial Targeting for Bovine Tuberculosis Control: Can the Locations of Infected Cattle Be Used to Find Infected Badgers?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(11), pages 1-14, November.
    5. John I. Carruthers & Selma Lewis & Gerritā€Jan Knaap & Robert N. Renner, 2010. "Coming undone: A spatial hazard analysis of urban form in American metropolitan areas," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 89(1), pages 65-88, March.
    6. McClain, Verena & Waldorf, Brigitte, 2017. "Borrowing From The Demographer's Toolbox: Longitudinal Methods in Regional Science," Working papers 264970, Purdue University, Department of Agricultural Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:50:y:2000:i:7-8:p:985-1000. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.