IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0134369.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Visual and Non-Visual Navigation in Blind Patients with a Retinal Prosthesis

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Garcia
  • Karin Petrini
  • Gary S Rubin
  • Lyndon Da Cruz
  • Marko Nardini

Abstract

Human adults with normal vision can combine visual landmark and non-visual self-motion cues to improve their navigational precision. Here we asked whether blind individuals treated with a retinal prosthesis could also benefit from using the resultant new visual signal together with non-visual information when navigating. Four patients (blind for 15-52 years) implanted with the Argus II retinal prosthesis (Second Sight Medical Products Inc. Sylmar, CA), and five age-matched and six younger controls, participated. Participants completed a path reproduction and a triangle completion navigation task, using either an indirect visual landmark and non-visual self-motion cues or non-visual self-motion cues only. Control participants wore goggles that approximated the field of view and the resolution of the Argus II prosthesis. In both tasks, control participants showed better precision when navigating with reduced vision, compared to without vision. Patients, however, did not show similar improvements when navigating with the prosthesis in the path reproduction task, but two patients did show improvements in the triangle completion task. Additionally, all patients showed greater precision than controls in both tasks when navigating without vision. These results indicate that the Argus II retinal prosthesis may not provide sufficiently reliable visual information to improve the precision of patients on tasks, for which they have learnt to rely on non-visual senses.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Garcia & Karin Petrini & Gary S Rubin & Lyndon Da Cruz & Marko Nardini, 2015. "Visual and Non-Visual Navigation in Blind Patients with a Retinal Prosthesis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-12, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0134369
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134369
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0134369
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0134369&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0134369?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. N. Lessard & M. Paré & F. Lepore & M. Lassonde, 1998. "Early-blind human subjects localize sound sources better than sighted subjects," Nature, Nature, vol. 395(6699), pages 278-280, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel-Robert Chebat & Shachar Maidenbaum & Amir Amedi, 2015. "Navigation Using Sensory Substitution in Real and Virtual Mazes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Takahiro Miura & Naoyuki Okochi & Junya Suzuki & Tohru Ifukube, 2023. "Binaural Listening with Head Rotation Helps Persons with Blindness Perceive Narrow Obstacles," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(8), pages 1-14, April.
    3. Kadjita Asumbisa & Adrien Peyrache & Stuart Trenholm, 2022. "Flexible cue anchoring strategies enable stable head direction coding in both sighted and blind animals," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Liam J Norman & Caitlin Dodsworth & Denise Foresteire & Lore Thaler, 2021. "Human click-based echolocation: Effects of blindness and age, and real-life implications in a 10-week training program," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-34, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0134369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.