IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0127002.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Ordinal Effects of Ostracism: A Meta-Analysis of 120 Cyberball Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Chris H J Hartgerink
  • Ilja van Beest
  • Jelte M Wicherts
  • Kipling D Williams

Abstract

We examined 120 Cyberball studies (N = 11,869) to determine the effect size of ostracism and conditions under which the effect may be reversed, eliminated, or small. Our analyses showed that (1) the average ostracism effect is large (d > |1.4|) and (2) generalizes across structural aspects (number of players, ostracism duration, number of tosses, type of needs scale), sampling aspects (gender, age, country), and types of dependent measure (interpersonal, intrapersonal, fundamental needs). Further, we test Williams’s (2009) proposition that the immediate impact of ostracism is resistant to moderation, but that moderation is more likely to be observed in delayed measures. Our findings suggest that (3) both first and last measures are susceptible to moderation and (4) time passed since being ostracized does not predict effect sizes of the last measure. Thus, support for this proposition is tenuous and we suggest modifications to the temporal need-threat model of ostracism.

Suggested Citation

  • Chris H J Hartgerink & Ilja van Beest & Jelte M Wicherts & Kipling D Williams, 2015. "The Ordinal Effects of Ostracism: A Meta-Analysis of 120 Cyberball Studies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-24, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0127002
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0127002
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0127002&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0127002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yejun Zhang & Mark C. Bolino & Kui Yin, 2023. "The Interactive Effect of Perceived Overqualification and Peer Overqualification on Peer Ostracism and Work Meaningfulness," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(3), pages 699-716, January.
    2. Toshiki Ikeda & Yuji Takeda, 2019. "Holding soft objects increases expectation and disappointment in the Cyberball task," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-11, April.
    3. Michael Niedeggen & Rudolf Kerschreiter & Katharina Schuck, 2019. "Loss of control as a violation of expectations: Testing the predictions of a common inconsistency compensation approach in an inclusionary cyberball game," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, September.
    4. Ana Paula Gonçalves Donate & Lucas Murrins Marques & Olivia Morgan Lapenta & Manish Kumar Asthana & David Amodio & Paulo Sérgio Boggio, 2017. "Ostracism via virtual chat room—Effects on basic needs, anger and pain," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-13, September.
    5. Yina Mao & Yan Liu & Chunyan Jiang & Iris D. Zhang, 2018. "Why am I ostracized and how would I react? — A review of workplace ostracism research," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 745-767, September.
    6. Chebat, Daniel-Robert & Lemarié, Linda & Rotnemer, Batya & Talbi, Tzviel & Wagner, Michael, 2021. "The young and the reckless: Social and physical warning messages reduce dangerous driving behavior in a simulator," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    7. Nimra Riasat & Zaqia Bano, 2022. "Development and Psychometric Properties of Adult Ostracism Scale," International Journal of Innovations in Science & Technology, 50sea, vol. 4(6), pages 62-69, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0127002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.