IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0121993.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intentional Weight Loss and All-Cause Mortality: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen B Kritchevsky
  • Kristen M Beavers
  • Michael E Miller
  • M Kyla Shea
  • Denise K Houston
  • Dalane W Kitzman
  • Barbara J Nicklas

Abstract

Background: Obesity is associated with increased mortality, and weight loss trials show rapid improvement in many mortality risk factors. Yet, observational studies typically associate weight loss with higher mortality risk. The purpose of this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of weight loss was to clarify the effects of intentional weight loss on mortality. Methods: 2,484 abstracts were identified and reviewed in PUBMED, yielding15 RCTs reporting (1) randomization to weight loss or non-weight loss arms, (2) duration of ≥18 months, and (3) deaths by intervention arm. Weight loss interventions were all lifestyle-based. Relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated for each trial. For trials reporting at least one death (n = 12), a summary estimate was calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel method. Sensitivity analysis using sparse data methods included remaining trials. Results: Trials enrolled 17,186 participants (53% female, mean age at randomization = 52 years). Mean body mass indices ranged from 30–46 kg/m2, follow-up times ranged from 18 months to 12.6 years (mean: 27 months), and average weight loss in reported trials was 5.5±4.0 kg. A total of 264 deaths were reported in weight loss groups and 310 in non-weight loss groups. The weight loss groups experienced a 15% lower all-cause mortality risk (RR = 0.85; 95% CI: 0.73–1.00). There was no evidence for heterogeneity of effect (Cochran’s Q = 5.59 (11 d.f.; p = 0.90); I2 = 0). Results were similar in trials with a mean age at randomization ≥55 years (RR = 0.84; 95% CI 0.71–0.99) and a follow-up time of ≥4 years (RR = 0.85; 95% CI 0.72–1.00). Conclusions: In obese adults, intentional weight loss may be associated with approximately a 15% reduction in all-cause mortality.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen B Kritchevsky & Kristen M Beavers & Michael E Miller & M Kyla Shea & Denise K Houston & Dalane W Kitzman & Barbara J Nicklas, 2015. "Intentional Weight Loss and All-Cause Mortality: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-12, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0121993
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121993
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0121993
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0121993&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0121993?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alberto Diaz-Ruiz & Tyler Rhinesmith & Laura C. D. Pomatto-Watson & Nathan L. Price & Farzin Eshaghi & Margaux R. Ehrlich & Jacqueline M. Moats & Melissa Carpenter & Annamaria Rudderow & Sebastian Bra, 2021. "Diet composition influences the metabolic benefits of short cycles of very low caloric intake," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Inhwan Lee & Shinuk Kim & Hyunsik Kang, 2019. "Lifestyle Risk Factors and All-Cause and Cardiovascular Disease Mortality: Data from the Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-11, August.
    3. Timothy B Smith & Connor Workman & Caleb Andrews & Bonnie Barton & Matthew Cook & Ryan Layton & Alexandra Morrey & Devin Petersen & Julianne Holt-Lunstad, 2021. "Effects of psychosocial support interventions on survival in inpatient and outpatient healthcare settings: A meta-analysis of 106 randomized controlled trials," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(5), pages 1-25, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0121993. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.