IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0118487.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Visual Context on Public Perceptions of Non-Human Primate Performers

Author

Listed:
  • Katherine A Leighty
  • Annie J Valuska
  • Alison P Grand
  • Tamara L Bettinger
  • Jill D Mellen
  • Stephen R Ross
  • Paul Boyle
  • Jacqueline J Ogden

Abstract

Prior research has shown that the use of apes, specifically chimpanzees, as performers in the media negatively impacts public attitudes of their conservation status and desirability as a pet, yet it is unclear whether these findings generalize to other non-human primates (specifically non-ape species). We evaluated the impact of viewing an image of a monkey or prosimian in an anthropomorphic or naturalistic setting, either in contact with or in the absence of a human. Viewing the primate in an anthropomorphic setting while in contact with a person significantly increased their desirability as a pet, which also correlated with increased likelihood of believing the animal was not endangered. The majority of viewers felt that the primates in all tested images were “nervous.” When shown in contact with a human, viewers felt they were “sad” and “scared”, while also being less “funny.” Our findings highlight the potential broader implications of the use of non-human primate performers by the entertainment industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Katherine A Leighty & Annie J Valuska & Alison P Grand & Tamara L Bettinger & Jill D Mellen & Stephen R Ross & Paul Boyle & Jacqueline J Ogden, 2015. "Impact of Visual Context on Public Perceptions of Non-Human Primate Performers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-6, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0118487
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118487
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0118487
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0118487&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0118487?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lancendorfer, Karen M. & Atkin, JoAnn L. & Reece, Bonnie B., 2008. "Animals in advertising: Love dogs? Love the ad!," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(5), pages 384-391, May.
    2. Stephen R Ross & Vivian M Vreeman & Elizabeth V Lonsdorf, 2011. "Specific Image Characteristics Influence Attitudes about Chimpanzee Conservation and Use as Pets," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-5, July.
    3. Kara K Schroepfer & Alexandra G Rosati & Tanya Chartrand & Brian Hare, 2011. "Use of “Entertainment” Chimpanzees in Commercials Distorts Public Perception Regarding Their Conservation Status," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(10), pages 1-8, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Edith Podhovnik, 2016. "The Meow Factor - An Investigation of Cat Content in Today's Media," Proceedings of Arts & Humanities Conferences 3806257, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    2. Crawford, Heather J. & Gregory, Gary D., 2015. "Humorous advertising that travels: A review and call for research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 569-577.
    3. Cindy G Grappe & Cindy Lombart & Didier Louis & Fabien Durif, 2021. ""Not tested on animals": How consumers react to cruelty-free cosmetics proposed by manufacturers and retailers?," Post-Print hal-03379593, HAL.
    4. Liu, Yahui & Chang, Xinyu & Yang, Shuai & Li, Zhen & Wu, Yingrong, 2024. "“Pets make you spend more!” Impact of pet ownership on consumer purchase decisions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    5. Kirk, Colleen P., 2019. "Dogs have masters, cats have staff: Consumers' psychological ownership and their economic valuation of pets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 306-318.
    6. Benaim, Mickael, 2018. "From symbolic values to symbolic innovation: Internet-memes and innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(5), pages 901-910.
    7. Aubrey H. Fine & Alan M. Beck & Zenithson Ng, 2019. "The State of Animal-Assisted Interventions: Addressing the Contemporary Issues That Will Shape the Future," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-19, October.
    8. Mykolas Simas Poškus & Rasa Pilkauskaitė Valickienė & Arvydas Kuzinas, 2019. "The Effects of Descriptive Imagery and Appeals on Emotions and Intentions Related to Pro-Environmental Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-20, September.
    9. José E. Ramos-Ruiz & Minerva Aguilar-Rivero & Jaime Aja-Valle & Lucía Castaño-Prieto, 2024. "An Analysis of the Demand for Tourist Accommodation to Travel with Dogs in Spain," Societies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-15, January.
    10. Jacobson, Jenna & Hodson, Jaigris & Mittelman, Robert, 2022. "Pup-ularity contest: The advertising practices of popular animal influencers on Instagram," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0118487. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.