IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0104854.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Motor Imagery for Severely Motor-Impaired Patients: Evidence for Brain-Computer Interfacing as Superior Control Solution

Author

Listed:
  • Johannes Höhne
  • Elisa Holz
  • Pit Staiger-Sälzer
  • Klaus-Robert Müller
  • Andrea Kübler
  • Michael Tangermann

Abstract

Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) strive to decode brain signals into control commands for severely handicapped people with no means of muscular control. These potential users of noninvasive BCIs display a large range of physical and mental conditions. Prior studies have shown the general applicability of BCI with patients, with the conflict of either using many training sessions or studying only moderately restricted patients. We present a BCI system designed to establish external control for severely motor-impaired patients within a very short time. Within only six experimental sessions, three out of four patients were able to gain significant control over the BCI, which was based on motor imagery or attempted execution. For the most affected patient, we found evidence that the BCI could outperform the best assistive technology (AT) of the patient in terms of control accuracy, reaction time and information transfer rate. We credit this success to the applied user-centered design approach and to a highly flexible technical setup. State-of-the art machine learning methods allowed the exploitation and combination of multiple relevant features contained in the EEG, which rapidly enabled the patients to gain substantial BCI control. Thus, we could show the feasibility of a flexible and tailorable BCI application in severely disabled users. This can be considered a significant success for two reasons: Firstly, the results were obtained within a short period of time, matching the tight clinical requirements. Secondly, the participating patients showed, compared to most other studies, very severe communication deficits. They were dependent on everyday use of AT and two patients were in a locked-in state. For the most affected patient a reliable communication was rarely possible with existing AT.

Suggested Citation

  • Johannes Höhne & Elisa Holz & Pit Staiger-Sälzer & Klaus-Robert Müller & Andrea Kübler & Michael Tangermann, 2014. "Motor Imagery for Severely Motor-Impaired Patients: Evidence for Brain-Computer Interfacing as Superior Control Solution," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-11, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0104854
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104854
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0104854
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0104854&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0104854?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. N. Birbaumer & N. Ghanayim & T. Hinterberger & I. Iversen & B. Kotchoubey & A. Kübler & J. Perelmouter & E. Taub & H. Flor, 1999. "A spelling device for the paralysed," Nature, Nature, vol. 398(6725), pages 297-298, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrey Eliseyev & Tetiana Aksenova, 2016. "Penalized Multi-Way Partial Least Squares for Smooth Trajectory Decoding from Electrocorticographic (ECoG) Recording," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, May.
    2. Ujwal Chaudhary & Bin Xia & Stefano Silvoni & Leonardo G Cohen & Niels Birbaumer, 2017. "Brain–Computer Interface–Based Communication in the Completely Locked-In State," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-25, January.
    3. Yasuhiko Nakanishi & Takufumi Yanagisawa & Duk Shin & Ryohei Fukuma & Chao Chen & Hiroyuki Kambara & Natsue Yoshimura & Masayuki Hirata & Toshiki Yoshimine & Yasuharu Koike, 2013. "Prediction of Three-Dimensional Arm Trajectories Based on ECoG Signals Recorded from Human Sensorimotor Cortex," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-9, August.
    4. Florin Popescu & Siamac Fazli & Yakob Badower & Benjamin Blankertz & Klaus-R Müller, 2007. "Single Trial Classification of Motor Imagination Using 6 Dry EEG Electrodes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(7), pages 1-5, July.
    5. Peter Loos & René Riedl & Gernot Müller-Putz & Jan Brocke & Fred Davis & Rajiv Banker & Pierre-Majorique Léger, 2010. "NeuroIS: Neuroscientific Approaches in the Investigation and Development of Information Systems," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 2(6), pages 395-401, December.
    6. Martin Spüler, 2019. "Questioning the evidence for BCI-based communication in the complete locked-in state," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(4), pages 1-5, April.
    7. Heung-Il Suk & Siamac Fazli & Jan Mehnert & Klaus-Robert Müller & Seong-Whan Lee, 2014. "Predicting BCI Subject Performance Using Probabilistic Spatio-Temporal Filters," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-15, February.
    8. Pavlov, A.N. & Grishina, D.S. & Runnova, A.E. & Maksimenko, V.A. & Pavlova, O.N. & Shchukovsky, N.V. & Hramov, A.E. & Kurths, J., 2019. "Recognition of electroencephalographic patterns related to human movements or mental intentions with multiresolution analysis," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 230-235.
    9. Laura Acqualagna & Loic Botrel & Carmen Vidaurre & Andrea Kübler & Benjamin Blankertz, 2016. "Large-Scale Assessment of a Fully Automatic Co-Adaptive Motor Imagery-Based Brain Computer Interface," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, February.
    10. Iñaki Iturrate & Jonathan Grizou & Jason Omedes & Pierre-Yves Oudeyer & Manuel Lopes & Luis Montesano, 2015. "Exploiting Task Constraints for Self-Calibrated Brain-Machine Interface Control Using Error-Related Potentials," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, July.
    11. Pieter-Jan Kindermans & Martijn Schreuder & Benjamin Schrauwen & Klaus-Robert Müller & Michael Tangermann, 2014. "True Zero-Training Brain-Computer Interfacing – An Online Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(7), pages 1-13, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0104854. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.