IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0082990.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Off-Patent Generic Medicines vs. Off-Patent Brand Medicines for Six Reference Drugs: A Retrospective Claims Data Study from Five Local Healthcare Units in the Lombardy Region of Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Giorgio L Colombo
  • Enrico Agabiti-Rosei
  • Alberto Margonato
  • Claudio Mencacci
  • Carlo Maurizio Montecucco
  • Roberto Trevisan

Abstract

: The scientific documentation supporting the potential clinical and economic benefits of a growing use of off-patent generic drugs in clinical practice seems to be limited in Italy as yet. Methods: We compared differences in outcomes between off-patent generic drugs and off-patent brand drugs in real clinical practice. The outcomes were: persistence and compliance with therapy, mortality, and other health resources consumption (hospitalizations, specialist examinations, other drugs) and total costs. Retrospective analysis was carried out by using the administrative databases of five Local Healthcare Units (ASLs - Aziende Sanitarie Locali) in the Lombardy Region of Italy. Data from the five ASLs were aggregated through a meta-analysis, which produced an estimate indicator of the mean or percentage difference between the two groups (branded vs. generic) and their respective significance tests. The therapeutic areas and studied drugs were: diabetes: metformin - A10BA02; hypertension: amlodipine - C08CA01; dyslipidemia: simvastatin - C10AA01; psychiatry: sertraline - N06AB06; cardiology: propafenone - C01BC03; osteoporosis: alendronate - M05BA04. Results: The 5 Local Healthcare Units (ASL) represent a population of 3,847,004 inhabitants. The selected sample included 347,073 patients, or 9.02% of the total ASL population; 67% of the patients were treated with off-patent brand drugs. The average age was 68 years, with no difference between the two groups. After 34 months of observation, compliance and persistence were in favor to generic drugs in all therapeutic areas and statistically significant in the metformin, amlodipine, simvastatin, and sertraline groups. The clinical outcomes (hospitalizations, mortality, and other health costs) show no statistically significant differences between off-patent generic vs. off-patent brand medicines. Conclusions: Off-patent generic drugs appear to be a therapy option of choice in Italy as well, based on clinical outcomes and economic consequences, both for the National Health Service and patients, considering that the price difference between brand and generic drugs is completely charged on patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Giorgio L Colombo & Enrico Agabiti-Rosei & Alberto Margonato & Claudio Mencacci & Carlo Maurizio Montecucco & Roberto Trevisan, 2013. "Off-Patent Generic Medicines vs. Off-Patent Brand Medicines for Six Reference Drugs: A Retrospective Claims Data Study from Five Local Healthcare Units in the Lombardy Region of Italy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-9, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0082990
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082990
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0082990
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0082990&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0082990?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pieter Dylst & Steven Simoens, 2011. "Does the Market Share of Generic Medicines Influence the Price Level?," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 29(10), pages 875-882, October.
    2. Lexchin, Joel, 2004. "The effect of generic competition on the price of brand-name drugs," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 47-54, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Merja Halme & Kari Linden & Kimmo Kääriä, 2009. "Patients’ Preferences for Generic and Branded Over-the-Counter Medicines," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 2(4), pages 243-255, December.
    2. Roger Feldman & Félix Lobo, 2013. "Competition in prescription drug markets: the roles of trademarks, advertising, and generic names," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 14(4), pages 667-675, August.
    3. Takizawa, Osamu & Urushihara, Hisashi & Tanaka, Shiro & Kawakami, Koji, 2015. "Price difference as a predictor of the selection between brand name and generic statins in Japan," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(5), pages 612-619.
    4. Sotiris Vandoros, 2014. "Therapeutic Substitution Post‐Patent Expiry: The Cases Of Ace Inhibitors And Proton Pump Inhibitors," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(5), pages 621-630, May.
    5. Timonen, Johanna & Karttunen, Pekka & Bengtström, Marina & Ahonen, Riitta, 2009. "The impact of generic substitution on the turnover and gross margin of pharmaceutical companies a survey 1 year and 5 years after the introduction of generic substitution in Finland," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(2-3), pages 116-123, October.
    6. Elek, Péter & Harsányi, András & Zelei, Tamás & Csetneki, Kata & Kaló, Zoltán, 2017. "Policy objective of generic medicines from the investment perspective: The case of clopidogrel," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(5), pages 558-565.
    7. Panos Kanavos & Joan Costa Font & Alistair McGuire, 2007. "Product differentiation, competition and regulation of new drugs: the case of statins in four European countries," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(4-5), pages 455-465.
    8. Lin, Yu-Shiuan & Lin, Min-Ting & Cheng, Shou-Hsia, 2019. "Drug price, dosage and safety: Real-world evidence of oral hypoglycemic agents," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(12), pages 1221-1229.
    9. Cristina Zerbini & Donata Tania Vergura & Beatrice Luceri, 2017. "Consumers? intention to buy generic drugs: Evidences from the Italian setting," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(1), pages 159-176.
    10. Kyung-Bok Son, 2020. "Is greater generic competition also linked to lower drug prices in South Korea?," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, December.
    11. Ville Aalto-Setälä, 2008. "The impact of generic substitution on price competition in Finland," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 9(2), pages 185-191, May.
    12. Gerard T. Vondeling & Qi Cao & Maarten J. Postma & Mark H. Rozenbaum, 2018. "The Impact of Patent Expiry on Drug Prices: A Systematic Literature Review," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 16(5), pages 653-660, October.
    13. Pieter Dylst & Steven Simoens, 2011. "Does the Market Share of Generic Medicines Influence the Price Level?," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 29(10), pages 875-882, October.
    14. Kanavos, Panos, 2014. "Measuring performance in off-patent drug markets: A methodological framework and empirical evidence from twelve EU Member States," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(2), pages 229-241.
    15. Tamara Hafner & David Popp, 2011. "China and India as Suppliers of Affordable Medicines to Developing Countries," NBER Working Papers 17249, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Meghan McGee & Kellia Chiu & Rahim Moineddin & Abhimanyu Sud, 2023. "The Impact of Suboxone’s Market Exclusivity on Cost of Opioid Use Disorder Treatment," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 501-510, May.
    17. Gonzalez, Jorge & Sismeiro, Catarina & Dutta, Shantanu & Stern, Philip, 2008. "Can branded drugs benefit from generic entry? The role of detailing and price in switching to non-bioequivalent molecules," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 247-260.
    18. Aida Isabel Tavares, 2017. "Generic substitution policy, an incentive approach," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 199-220, June.
    19. Gonzalez, Jorge & Sismeiro, Catarina & Dutta, Shantanu & Stern, Philip, 2006. "Market Effects of Generic Entry: The Role of Physicians and of Non-Bioequivalent Competitors," MPRA Paper 3717, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised May 2007.
    20. Geitona, Mary & Zavras, Dimitrios & Hatzikou, Magda & Kyriopoulos, John, 2006. "Generics market in Greece: The pharmaceutical industry's beliefs," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(1), pages 35-48, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0082990. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.