IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0076601.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamics of Dual Prism Adaptation: Relating Novel Experimental Results to a Minimalistic Neural Model

Author

Listed:
  • Orlando Arévalo
  • Mona A Bornschlegl
  • Sven Eberhardt
  • Udo Ernst
  • Klaus Pawelzik
  • Manfred Fahle

Abstract

In everyday life, humans interact with a dynamic environment often requiring rapid adaptation of visual perception and motor control. In particular, new visuo–motor mappings must be learned while old skills have to be kept, such that after adaptation, subjects may be able to quickly change between two different modes of generating movements (‘dual–adaptation’). A fundamental question is how the adaptation schedule determines the acquisition speed of new skills. Given a fixed number of movements in two different environments, will dual–adaptation be faster if switches (‘phase changes’) between the environments occur more frequently? We investigated the dynamics of dual–adaptation under different training schedules in a virtual pointing experiment. Surprisingly, we found that acquisition speed of dual visuo–motor mappings in a pointing task is largely independent of the number of phase changes. Next, we studied the neuronal mechanisms underlying this result and other key phenomena of dual–adaptation by relating model simulations to experimental data. We propose a simple and yet biologically plausible neural model consisting of a spatial mapping from an input layer to a pointing angle which is subjected to a global gain modulation. Adaptation is performed by reinforcement learning on the model parameters. Despite its simplicity, the model provides a unifying account for a broad range of experimental data: It quantitatively reproduced the learning rates in dual–adaptation experiments for both direct effect, i.e. adaptation to prisms, and aftereffect, i.e. behavior after removal of prisms, and their independence on the number of phase changes. Several other phenomena, e.g. initial pointing errors that are far smaller than the induced optical shift, were also captured. Moreover, the underlying mechanisms, a local adaptation of a spatial mapping and a global adaptation of a gain factor, explained asymmetric spatial transfer and generalization of prism adaptation, as observed in other experiments.

Suggested Citation

  • Orlando Arévalo & Mona A Bornschlegl & Sven Eberhardt & Udo Ernst & Klaus Pawelzik & Manfred Fahle, 2013. "Dynamics of Dual Prism Adaptation: Relating Novel Experimental Results to a Minimalistic Neural Model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(10), pages 1-12, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0076601
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076601
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0076601
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0076601&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0076601?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maurice A Smith & Ali Ghazizadeh & Reza Shadmehr, 2006. "Interacting Adaptive Processes with Different Timescales Underlie Short-Term Motor Learning," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(6), pages 1-1, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Takuya Honda & Masaya Hirashima & Daichi Nozaki, 2012. "Adaptation to Visual Feedback Delay Influences Visuomotor Learning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(5), pages 1-9, May.
    2. Wilsaan M Joiner & Gary C Sing & Maurice A Smith, 2017. "Temporal specificity of the initial adaptive response in motor adaptation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Ajaz Ahmad Bhat & Gaurang Mahajan & Anita Mehta, 2011. "Learning with a Network of Competing Synapses," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-9, September.
    4. Jun Izawa & Reza Shadmehr, 2011. "Learning from Sensory and Reward Prediction Errors during Motor Adaptation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(3), pages 1-11, March.
    5. Jordan A Taylor & Kurt A Thoroughman, 2008. "Motor Adaptation Scaled by the Difficulty of a Secondary Cognitive Task," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(6), pages 1-11, June.
    6. Barbara Feulner & Matthew G. Perich & Lee E. Miller & Claudia Clopath & Juan A. Gallego, 2025. "A neural implementation model of feedback-based motor learning," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-14, December.
    7. Aaron L Wong & Mark Shelhamer, 2011. "Exploring the Fundamental Dynamics of Error-Based Motor Learning Using a Stationary Predictive-Saccade Task," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-13, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0076601. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.