IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0002485.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Motor Adaptation Scaled by the Difficulty of a Secondary Cognitive Task

Author

Listed:
  • Jordan A Taylor
  • Kurt A Thoroughman

Abstract

Background: Motor learning requires evaluating performance in previous movements and modifying future movements. The executive system, generally involved in planning and decision-making, could monitor and modify behavior in response to changes in task difficulty or performance. Here we aim to identify the quantitative cognitive contribution to responsive and adaptive control to identify possible overlap between cognitive and motor processes. Methodology/Principal Findings: We developed a dual-task experiment that varied the trial-by-trial difficulty of a secondary cognitive task while participants performed a motor adaptation task. Subjects performed a difficulty-graded semantic categorization task while making reaching movements that were occasionally subjected to force perturbations. We find that motor adaptation was specifically impaired on the most difficult to categorize trials. Conclusions/Significance: We suggest that the degree of decision-level difficulty of a particular categorization differentially burdens the executive system and subsequently results in a proportional degradation of adaptation. Our results suggest a specific quantitative contribution of executive control in motor adaptation.

Suggested Citation

  • Jordan A Taylor & Kurt A Thoroughman, 2008. "Motor Adaptation Scaled by the Difficulty of a Secondary Cognitive Task," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(6), pages 1-11, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0002485
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002485
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0002485
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0002485&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0002485?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maurice A Smith & Ali Ghazizadeh & Reza Shadmehr, 2006. "Interacting Adaptive Processes with Different Timescales Underlie Short-Term Motor Learning," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(6), pages 1-1, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aaron L Wong & Mark Shelhamer, 2011. "Exploring the Fundamental Dynamics of Error-Based Motor Learning Using a Stationary Predictive-Saccade Task," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-13, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Takuya Honda & Masaya Hirashima & Daichi Nozaki, 2012. "Adaptation to Visual Feedback Delay Influences Visuomotor Learning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(5), pages 1-9, May.
    2. Wilsaan M Joiner & Gary C Sing & Maurice A Smith, 2017. "Temporal specificity of the initial adaptive response in motor adaptation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Ajaz Ahmad Bhat & Gaurang Mahajan & Anita Mehta, 2011. "Learning with a Network of Competing Synapses," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-9, September.
    4. Jun Izawa & Reza Shadmehr, 2011. "Learning from Sensory and Reward Prediction Errors during Motor Adaptation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(3), pages 1-11, March.
    5. Barbara Feulner & Matthew G. Perich & Lee E. Miller & Claudia Clopath & Juan A. Gallego, 2025. "A neural implementation model of feedback-based motor learning," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Orlando Arévalo & Mona A Bornschlegl & Sven Eberhardt & Udo Ernst & Klaus Pawelzik & Manfred Fahle, 2013. "Dynamics of Dual Prism Adaptation: Relating Novel Experimental Results to a Minimalistic Neural Model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(10), pages 1-12, October.
    7. Aaron L Wong & Mark Shelhamer, 2011. "Exploring the Fundamental Dynamics of Error-Based Motor Learning Using a Stationary Predictive-Saccade Task," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-13, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0002485. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.