IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0067429.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and Validation of a Risk Score Predicting Substantial Weight Gain over 5 Years in Middle-Aged European Men and Women

Author

Listed:
  • Annika Steffen
  • Thorkild I A Sørensen
  • Sven Knüppel
  • Noemie Travier
  • María-José Sánchez
  • José María Huerta
  • J Ramón Quirós
  • Eva Ardanaz
  • Miren Dorronsoro
  • Birgit Teucher
  • Kuanrong Li
  • H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita
  • Daphne van der A
  • Amalia Mattiello
  • Domenico Palli
  • Rosario Tumino
  • Vittorio Krogh
  • Paolo Vineis
  • Antonia Trichopoulou
  • Philippos Orfanos
  • Dimitrios Trichopoulos
  • Bo Hedblad
  • Peter Wallström
  • Kim Overvad
  • Jytte Halkjær
  • Anne Tjønneland
  • Guy Fagherazzi
  • Laureen Dartois
  • Francesca Crowe
  • Kay-Tee Khaw
  • Nick Wareham
  • Lefkos Middleton
  • Anne M May
  • Petra H M Peeters
  • Heiner Boeing

Abstract

Background: Identifying individuals at high risk of excess weight gain may help targeting prevention efforts at those at risk of various metabolic diseases associated with weight gain. Our aim was to develop a risk score to identify these individuals and validate it in an external population. Methods: We used lifestyle and nutritional data from 53°758 individuals followed for a median of 5.4 years from six centers of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) to develop a risk score to predict substantial weight gain (SWG) for the next 5 years (derivation sample). Assuming linear weight gain, SWG was defined as gaining ≥10% of baseline weight during follow-up. Proportional hazards models were used to identify significant predictors of SWG separately by EPIC center. Regression coefficients of predictors were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Pooled coefficients were used to assign weights to each predictor. The risk score was calculated as a linear combination of the predictors. External validity of the score was evaluated in nine other centers of the EPIC study (validation sample). Results: Our final model included age, sex, baseline weight, level of education, baseline smoking, sports activity, alcohol use, and intake of six food groups. The model's discriminatory ability measured by the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.64 (95% CI = 0.63–0.65) in the derivation sample and 0.57 (95% CI = 0.56–0.58) in the validation sample, with variation between centers. Positive and negative predictive values for the optimal cut-off value of ≥200 points were 9% and 96%, respectively. Conclusion: The present risk score confidently excluded a large proportion of individuals from being at any appreciable risk to develop SWG within the next 5 years. Future studies, however, may attempt to further refine the positive prediction of the score.

Suggested Citation

  • Annika Steffen & Thorkild I A Sørensen & Sven Knüppel & Noemie Travier & María-José Sánchez & José María Huerta & J Ramón Quirós & Eva Ardanaz & Miren Dorronsoro & Birgit Teucher & Kuanrong Li & H Bas, 2013. "Development and Validation of a Risk Score Predicting Substantial Weight Gain over 5 Years in Middle-Aged European Men and Women," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(7), pages 1-11, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0067429
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067429
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0067429
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0067429&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0067429?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anne von Ruesten & Annika Steffen & Anna Floegel & Daphne L van der A & Giovanna Masala & Anne Tjønneland & Jytte Halkjaer & Domenico Palli & Nicholas J Wareham & Ruth J F Loos & Thorkild I A Sørensen, 2011. "Trend in Obesity Prevalence in European Adult Cohort Populations during Follow-up since 1996 and Their Predictions to 2015," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(11), pages 1-9, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nikoletta Vidra & Maarten J. Bijlsma & Fanny Janssen, 2018. "Impact of Different Estimation Methods on Obesity-Attributable Mortality Levels and Trends: The Case of The Netherlands," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-11, September.
    2. Michael Lebenbaum & Osvaldo Espin-Garcia & Yi Li & Laura C Rosella, 2018. "Development and validation of a population based risk algorithm for obesity: The Obesity Population Risk Tool (OPoRT)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, January.
    3. Barbieri, Paolo Nicola, 2017. "Modelling body weight, dieting and obesity traps," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 468(C), pages 139-146.
    4. Van Hoye, Aurélie & Vandoorne, Chantal & Absil, Gaetan & Lecomte, Flore & Fallon, Catherine & Lombrail, Pierre & Vuillemin, Anne, 2019. "Health enhancing physical activity in all policies? Comparison of national public actors between France and Belgium," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(3), pages 327-332.
    5. Barbieri, Paolo Nicola, 2016. "Weight loss, obesity traps and policy policies," MPRA Paper 71327, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Barbieri, Paolo Nicola, 2015. "Body Weight, Dieting and Obesity Traps," MPRA Paper 67671, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0067429. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.