IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0054658.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Grasp Detection from Human ECoG during Natural Reach-to-Grasp Movements

Author

Listed:
  • Tobias Pistohl
  • Thomas Sebastian Benedikt Schmidt
  • Tonio Ball
  • Andreas Schulze-Bonhage
  • Ad Aertsen
  • Carsten Mehring

Abstract

Various movement parameters of grasping movements, like velocity or type of the grasp, have been successfully decoded from neural activity. However, the question of movement event detection from brain activity, that is, decoding the time at which an event occurred (e.g. movement onset), has been addressed less often. Yet, this may be a topic of key importance, as a brain-machine interface (BMI) that controls a grasping prosthesis could be realized by detecting the time of grasp, together with an optional decoding of which type of grasp to apply. We, therefore, studied the detection of time of grasps from human ECoG recordings during a sequence of natural and continuous reach-to-grasp movements. Using signals recorded from the motor cortex, a detector based on regularized linear discriminant analysis was able to retrieve the time-point of grasp with high reliability and only few false detections. Best performance was achieved using a combination of signal components from time and frequency domains. Sensitivity, measured by the amount of correct detections, and specificity, represented by the amount of false detections, depended strongly on the imposed restrictions on temporal precision of detection and on the delay between event detection and the time the event occurred. Including neural data from after the event into the decoding analysis, slightly increased accuracy, however, reasonable performance could also be obtained when grasping events were detected 125 ms in advance. In summary, our results provide a good basis for using detection of grasping movements from ECoG to control a grasping prosthesis.

Suggested Citation

  • Tobias Pistohl & Thomas Sebastian Benedikt Schmidt & Tonio Ball & Andreas Schulze-Bonhage & Ad Aertsen & Carsten Mehring, 2013. "Grasp Detection from Human ECoG during Natural Reach-to-Grasp Movements," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0054658
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054658
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0054658
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0054658&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0054658?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Meel Velliste & Sagi Perel & M. Chance Spalding & Andrew S. Whitford & Andrew B. Schwartz, 2008. "Cortical control of a prosthetic arm for self-feeding," Nature, Nature, vol. 453(7198), pages 1098-1101, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Linlin Li & Shufang Zhao & Wenhao Ran & Zhexin Li & Yongxu Yan & Bowen Zhong & Zheng Lou & Lili Wang & Guozhen Shen, 2022. "Dual sensing signal decoupling based on tellurium anisotropy for VR interaction and neuro-reflex system application," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Andrey Eliseyev & Tetiana Aksenova, 2016. "Penalized Multi-Way Partial Least Squares for Smooth Trajectory Decoding from Electrocorticographic (ECoG) Recording," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, May.
    3. Nuri F Ince & Rahul Gupta & Sami Arica & Ahmed H Tewfik & James Ashe & Giuseppe Pellizzer, 2010. "High Accuracy Decoding of Movement Target Direction in Non-Human Primates Based on Common Spatial Patterns of Local Field Potentials," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(12), pages 1-11, December.
    4. Shinsuke Koyama & Uri Eden & Emery Brown & Robert Kass, 2010. "Bayesian decoding of neural spike trains," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 62(1), pages 37-59, February.
    5. Yasuhiko Nakanishi & Takufumi Yanagisawa & Duk Shin & Ryohei Fukuma & Chao Chen & Hiroyuki Kambara & Natsue Yoshimura & Masayuki Hirata & Toshiki Yoshimine & Yasuharu Koike, 2013. "Prediction of Three-Dimensional Arm Trajectories Based on ECoG Signals Recorded from Human Sensorimotor Cortex," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-9, August.
    6. Zheng Li & Joseph E O'Doherty & Timothy L Hanson & Mikhail A Lebedev & Craig S Henriquez & Miguel A L Nicolelis, 2009. "Unscented Kalman Filter for Brain-Machine Interfaces," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(7), pages 1-18, July.
    7. Tomislav Milekovic & Tonio Ball & Andreas Schulze-Bonhage & Ad Aertsen & Carsten Mehring, 2013. "Detection of Error Related Neuronal Responses Recorded by Electrocorticography in Humans during Continuous Movements," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(2), pages 1-20, February.
    8. Josh Merel & David Carlson & Liam Paninski & John P Cunningham, 2016. "Neuroprosthetic Decoder Training as Imitation Learning," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-24, May.
    9. Andrés Úbeda & Enrique Hortal & Eduardo Iáñez & Carlos Perez-Vidal & Jose M Azorín, 2015. "Assessing Movement Factors in Upper Limb Kinematics Decoding from EEG Signals," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-12, May.
    10. Sebastian Schleidgen & Orsolya Friedrich & Selin Gerlek & Galia Assadi & Johanna Seifert, 2023. "The concept of “interaction” in debates on human–machine interaction," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.
    11. Han-Lin Hsieh & Maryam M Shanechi, 2018. "Optimizing the learning rate for adaptive estimation of neural encoding models," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-34, May.
    12. Jonathan A Michaels & Benjamin Dann & Hansjörg Scherberger, 2016. "Neural Population Dynamics during Reaching Are Better Explained by a Dynamical System than Representational Tuning," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-22, November.
    13. Hong Gi Yeom & June Sic Kim & Chun Kee Chung, 2014. "High-Accuracy Brain-Machine Interfaces Using Feedback Information," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(7), pages 1-7, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0054658. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.