IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0046570.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling Drosophila Positional Preferences in Open Field Arenas with Directional Persistence and Wall Attraction

Author

Listed:
  • Benjamin Soibam
  • Rachel L Goldfeder
  • Claire Manson-Bishop
  • Rachel Gamblin
  • Scott D Pletcher
  • Shishir Shah
  • Gemunu H Gunaratne
  • Gregg W Roman

Abstract

In open field arenas, Drosophila adults exhibit a preference for arena boundaries over internal walls and open regions. Herein, we investigate the nature of this preference using phenomenological modeling of locomotion to determine whether local arena features and constraints on movement alone are sufficient to drive positional preferences within open field arenas of different shapes and with different internal features. Our model has two components: directional persistence and local wall force. In regions far away from walls, the trajectory is entirely characterized by a directional persistence probability, , for each movement defined by the step size, , and the turn angle, . In close proximity to walls, motion is computed from and a local attractive force which depends on the distance between the fly and points on the walls. The directional persistence probability was obtained experimentally from trajectories of wild type Drosophila in a circular open field arena and the wall force was computed to minimize the difference between the radial distributions from the model and Drosophila in the same circular arena. The two-component model for fly movement was challenged by comparing the positional preferences from the two-component model to wild type Drosophila in a variety of open field arenas. In most arenas there was a strong concordance between the two-component model and Drosophila. In more complex arenas, the model exhibits similar trends, but some significant differences were found. These differences suggest that there are emergent features within these complex arenas that have significance for the fly, such as potential shelter. Hence, the two-component model is an important step in defining how Drosophila interact with their environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Benjamin Soibam & Rachel L Goldfeder & Claire Manson-Bishop & Rachel Gamblin & Scott D Pletcher & Shishir Shah & Gemunu H Gunaratne & Gregg W Roman, 2012. "Modeling Drosophila Positional Preferences in Open Field Arenas with Directional Persistence and Wall Attraction," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(10), pages 1-16, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0046570
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046570
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0046570
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0046570&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0046570?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0046570. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.