IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0043617.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inappropriateness of Medication Prescriptions to Elderly Patients in the Primary Care Setting: A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Dedan Opondo
  • Saied Eslami
  • Stefan Visscher
  • Sophia E de Rooij
  • Robert Verheij
  • Joke C Korevaar
  • Ameen Abu-Hanna

Abstract

Background: Inappropriate medication prescription is a common cause of preventable adverse drug events among elderly persons in the primary care setting. Objective: The aim of this systematic review is to quantify the extent of inappropriate prescription to elderly persons in the primary care setting. Methods: We systematically searched Ovid-Medline and Ovid-EMBASE from 1950 and 1980 respectively to March 2012. Two independent reviewers screened and selected primary studies published in English that measured (in)appropriate medication prescription among elderly persons (>65 years) in the primary care setting. We extracted data sources, instruments for assessing medication prescription appropriateness, and the rate of inappropriate medication prescriptions. We grouped the reported individual medications according to the Anatomical Therapeutic and Chemical (ATC) classification and compared the median rate of inappropriate medication prescription and its range within each therapeutic class. Results: We included 19 studies, 14 of which used the Beers criteria as the instrument for assessing appropriateness of prescriptions. The median rate of inappropriate medication prescriptions (IMP) was 20.5% [IQR 18.1 to 25.6%.]. Medications with largest median rate of inappropriate medication prescriptions were propoxyphene 4.52(0.10–23.30)%, doxazosin 3.96 (0.32 15.70)%, diphenhydramine 3.30(0.02–4.40)% and amitriptiline 3.20 (0.05–20.5)% in a decreasing order of IMP rate. Available studies described unequal sets of medications and different measurement tools to estimate the overall prevalence of inappropriate prescription. Conclusions: Approximately one in five prescriptions to elderly persons in primary care is inappropropriate despite the attention that has been directed to quality of prescription. Diphenhydramine and amitriptiline are the most common inappropriately prescribed medications with high risk adverse events while propoxyphene and doxazoxin are the most commonly prescribed medications with low risk adverse events. These medications are good candidates for being targeted for improvement e.g. by computerized clinical decision support.

Suggested Citation

  • Dedan Opondo & Saied Eslami & Stefan Visscher & Sophia E de Rooij & Robert Verheij & Joke C Korevaar & Ameen Abu-Hanna, 2012. "Inappropriateness of Medication Prescriptions to Elderly Patients in the Primary Care Setting: A Systematic Review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(8), pages 1-9, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0043617
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043617
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0043617
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0043617&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0043617?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Miguel Ángel Hernández-Rodríguez & Ermengol Sempere-Verdú & Caterina Vicens-Caldentey & Francisca González-Rubio & Félix Miguel-García & Vicente Palop-Larrea & Ramón Orueta-Sánchez & Óscar Esteban-Jim, 2021. "Drug Prescription Profiles in Patients with Polypharmacy in Spain: A Large-Scale Pharmacoepidemiologic Study Using Real-World Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-10, April.
    2. Xisco Reus & Maria Lluisa Sastre & Alfonso Leiva & Belén Sánchez & Cristina García-Serra & Ignatios Ioakeim-Skoufa & Caterina Vicens, 2022. "LESS-PHARMA Study: Identifying and Deprescribing Potentially Inappropriate Medication in the Elderly Population with Excessive Polypharmacy in Primary Care," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-10, October.
    3. Quaglio, GianLuca & Karapiperis, Theodoros & Van Woensel, Lieve & Arnold, Elleke & McDaid, David, 2013. "Austerity and health in Europe," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 13-19.
    4. Sonja Kallio & Tiina Eskola & Marika Pohjanoksa-Mäntylä & Marja Airaksinen, 2020. "Medication Risk Management in Routine Dispensing in Community Pharmacies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-12, November.
    5. Arim Kwak & Yoo Jin Moon & Yun-Kyoung Song & Hwi-Yeol Yun & Kyungim Kim, 2019. "Economic Impact of Pharmacist-Participated Medication Management for Elderly Patients in Nursing Homes: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-19, August.
    6. Oliver Reich & Thomas Rosemann & Roland Rapold & Eva Blozik & Oliver Senn, 2014. "Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Patients in Swiss Managed Care Plans: Prevalence, Determinants and Association with Hospitalization," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-9, August.
    7. Adel A. Alfahmi & Colin M. Curtain & Mohammed S. Salahudeen, 2023. "Assessment of Knowledge, Attitude and Practices of the Hospital and Community Pharmacists in Saudi Arabia (Jeddah) towards Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-13, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0043617. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.