IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0036929.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Less Is More: Latent Learning Is Maximized by Shorter Training Sessions in Auditory Perceptual Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Katharine Molloy
  • David R Moore
  • Ediz Sohoglu
  • Sygal Amitay

Abstract

Background: The time course and outcome of perceptual learning can be affected by the length and distribution of practice, but the training regimen parameters that govern these effects have received little systematic study in the auditory domain. We asked whether there was a minimum requirement on the number of trials within a training session for learning to occur, whether there was a maximum limit beyond which additional trials became ineffective, and whether multiple training sessions provided benefit over a single session. Methodology/Principal Findings: We investigated the efficacy of different regimens that varied in the distribution of practice across training sessions and in the overall amount of practice received on a frequency discrimination task. While learning was relatively robust to variations in regimen, the group with the shortest training sessions (∼8 min) had significantly faster learning in early stages of training than groups with longer sessions. In later stages, the group with the longest training sessions (>1 hr) showed slower learning than the other groups, suggesting overtraining. Between-session improvements were inversely correlated with performance; they were largest at the start of training and reduced as training progressed. In a second experiment we found no additional longer-term improvement in performance, retention, or transfer of learning for a group that trained over 4 sessions (∼4 hr in total) relative to a group that trained for a single session (∼1 hr). However, the mechanisms of learning differed; the single-session group continued to improve in the days following cessation of training, whereas the multi-session group showed no further improvement once training had ceased. Conclusions/Significance: Shorter training sessions were advantageous because they allowed for more latent, between-session and post-training learning to emerge. These findings suggest that efficient regimens should use short training sessions, and optimized spacing between sessions.

Suggested Citation

  • Katharine Molloy & David R Moore & Ediz Sohoglu & Sygal Amitay, 2012. "Less Is More: Latent Learning Is Maximized by Shorter Training Sessions in Auditory Perceptual Learning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(5), pages 1-13, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0036929
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036929
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0036929
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0036929&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0036929?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Merav Ahissar & Shaul Hochstein, 1997. "Task difficulty and the specificity of perceptual learning," Nature, Nature, vol. 387(6631), pages 401-406, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Susana T L Chung & Roger W Li & Dennis M Levi, 2012. "Learning to Identify Near-Acuity Letters, either with or without Flankers, Results in Improved Letter Size and Spacing Limits in Adults with Amblyopia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(4), pages 1-11, April.
    2. Stefanie Duyck & Hans Op de Beeck, 2019. "An investigation of far and near transfer in a gamified visual learning paradigm," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(12), pages 1-23, December.
    3. Sygal Amitay & Lorna Halliday & Jenny Taylor & Ediz Sohoglu & David R Moore, 2010. "Motivation and Intelligence Drive Auditory Perceptual Learning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(3), pages 1-8, March.
    4. Jacqueline M Fulvio & C Shawn Green & Paul R Schrater, 2014. "Task-Specific Response Strategy Selection on the Basis of Recent Training Experience," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, January.
    5. Gesa Lange & Eric Lowet & Mark J Roberts & Peter De Weerd, 2018. "Within-quadrant position and orientation specificity after extensive orientation discrimination learning is related to performance gains during late learning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-37, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0036929. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.