IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0036293.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Association between the ERCC5 Asp1104His Polymorphism and Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Mei-Ling Zhu
  • Mengyun Wang
  • Zhi-Gang Cao
  • Jing He
  • Ting-Yan Shi
  • Kai-Qin Xia
  • Li-Xin Qiu
  • Qing-Yi Wei

Abstract

Background: Excision repair cross complementing group 5 (ERCC5 or XPG) plays an important role in regulating DNA excision repair, removal of bulky lesions caused by environmental chemicals or UV light. Mutations in this gene cause a rare autosomal recessive syndrome, and its functional single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) may alter DNA repair capacity phenotype and cancer risk. However, a series of epidemiological studies on the association between the ERCC5 Asp1104His polymorphism (rs17655, G>C) and cancer susceptibility generated conflicting results. Methodology/Principal Findings: To derive a more precise estimation of the association between the ERCC5 Asp1104His polymorphism and overall cancer risk, we performed a meta-analysis of 44 published case-control studies, in which a total of 23,490 cases and 27,168 controls were included. To provide additional biological plausibility, we also assessed the genotype-gene expression correlation from the HapMap phase II release 23 data with 270 individuals from 4 ethnic populations. When all studies were pooled, we found no statistical evidence for a significantly increased cancer risk in the recessive genetic models (His/His vs. Asp/Asp: OR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.92–1.06, P = 0.242 for heterogeneity or His/His vs. Asp/His + Asp/Asp: OR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.93–1.03, P = 0.260 for heterogeneity), nor in further stratified analyses by cancer type, ethnicity, source of controls and sample size. In the genotype-phenotype correlation analysis from 270 individuals, we consistently found no significant correlation of the Asp1104His polymorphism with ERCC5 mRNA expression. Conclusions/Significance: This meta-analysis suggests that it is unlikely that the ERCC5 Asp1104His polymorphism may contribute to individual susceptibility to cancer risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Mei-Ling Zhu & Mengyun Wang & Zhi-Gang Cao & Jing He & Ting-Yan Shi & Kai-Qin Xia & Li-Xin Qiu & Qing-Yi Wei, 2012. "Association between the ERCC5 Asp1104His Polymorphism and Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(7), pages 1-9, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0036293
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036293
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0036293
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0036293&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0036293?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Errol C. Friedberg, 2003. "DNA damage and repair," Nature, Nature, vol. 421(6921), pages 436-440, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bing-Hu Li & Li-Li Zhang & Bei-Bei Zhang & Yan-Wei Yin & Li-Meng Dai & Yan Pi & Lu Guo & Chang-Yue Gao & Chuan-Qin Fang & Jing-Zhou Wang & Jing-Cheng Li, 2013. "Association between NADPH Oxidase p22phox C242T Polymorphism and Ischemic Cerebrovascular Disease: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(2), pages 1-8, February.
    2. Haina Du & Nannan Guo & Bin Shi & Qian Zhang & Zhipeng Chen & Kai Lu & Yongqian Shu & Tao Chen & Lingjun Zhu, 2014. "The Effect of XPD Polymorphisms on Digestive Tract Cancers Risk: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(5), pages 1-11, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Richard A Hubner & Richard D Riley & Lucinda J Billingham & Sanjay Popat, 2011. "Excision Repair Cross-Complementation Group 1 (ERCC1) Status and Lung Cancer Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis of Published Studies and Recommendations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(10), pages 1-10, October.
    2. Guo, Junfeng & Wang, Fei & Xue, Qianwen & Wang, Mengqing, 2023. "Cluster synchronization control for coupled genetic oscillator networks under denial-of-service attacks: Pinning partial impulsive strategy," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0036293. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.