IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0032025.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychometric Properties of the Danish Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire: The SDQ Assessed for More than 70,000 Raters in Four Different Cohorts

Author

Listed:
  • Janni Niclasen
  • Thomas William Teasdale
  • Anne-Marie Nybo Andersen
  • Anne Mette Skovgaard
  • Hanne Elberling
  • Carsten Obel

Abstract

Background: The Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a brief behavioural five factor instrument developed to assess emotional and behavioural problems in children and adolescents. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the psychometric properties for parent and teacher ratings in the Danish version of SDQ for different age groups of boys and girls. Methods: The Danish versions of the SDQ were distributed to a total of 71,840 parent and teacher raters of 5-, 7- and 10- to 12-year-old children included in four large scale Danish cohorts. The internal reliability was assessed and exploratory factor analyses were carried out to replicate the originally proposed five factor structure. Mean scores and percentiles were examined in order to differentiate between low, medium and high levels of emotional and behavioural difficulties. Results: The original five factor structure could be substantially confirmed. The Conduct items however did not solely load on the proposed Conduct scale and the Conduct scale was further contaminated by non-conduct items. Positively worded items tended to load on the Prosocial scale. This was more so the case for teachers than for parents. Parent and teacher means and percentiles were found to be lower compared to British figures but similar to or only slightly lower than those found in the other Nordic countries. The percentiles for girls were generally lower than for boys, markedly so for the teacher hyperactivity ratings. Conclusions: The study supports the usefulness of the SDQ as a screening tool for boys and girls across age groups and raters in the general Danish population.

Suggested Citation

  • Janni Niclasen & Thomas William Teasdale & Anne-Marie Nybo Andersen & Anne Mette Skovgaard & Hanne Elberling & Carsten Obel, 2012. "Psychometric Properties of the Danish Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire: The SDQ Assessed for More than 70,000 Raters in Four Different Cohorts," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(2), pages 1-8, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0032025
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0032025
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0032025&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0032025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maria Keilow & Hans Henrik Sievertsen & Janni Niclasen & Carsten Obel, 2019. "The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and standardized academic tests: Reliability across respondent type and age," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-12, July.
    2. Del Bono, Emilia & Etheridge, Ben & Garcia, Paul, 2024. "The economic value of childhood socio-emotional skills," ISER Working Paper Series 2024-01, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    3. Dietrichson, Jens & Klokker, Rasmus H., 2024. "Predicting preschool problems," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    4. Jensen, Bente & Jensen, Peter & Rasmussen, Astrid Würtz, 2017. "Does professional development of preschool teachers improve children's socio-emotional outcomes?," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 26-39.
    5. Eiberg, Misja & Olsen, Rikke Fuglsang, 2022. "Too high or too low? the role of educational expectations for children in out-of-home care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    6. Heba J. Sabbagh & Ghadeer Sharton & Jumana Almaghrabi & Manal Al-Malik & Mona Hassan Ahmed Hassan & Narmin Helal, 2021. "Effect of Environmental Tobacco Smoke on Children’s Anxiety and Behavior in Dental Clinics, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-10, January.
    7. Jun Wang & Ke Liu & Jing Zheng & Jiali Liu & Liming You, 2017. "Prevalence of Mental Health Problems and Associated Risk Factors among Rural-to-Urban Migrant Children in Guangzhou, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-15, November.
    8. Charlotte L Hall & Boliang Guo & Althea Z Valentine & Madeline J Groom & David Daley & Kapil Sayal & Chris Hollis, 2019. "The validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) for children with ADHD symptoms," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-19, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0032025. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.