IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0029618.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

True versus False Parasite Interactions: A Robust Method to Take Risk Factors into Account and Its Application to Feline Viruses

Author

Listed:
  • Eléonore Hellard
  • Dominique Pontier
  • Frank Sauvage
  • Hervé Poulet
  • David Fouchet

Abstract

Background: Multiple infections are common in natural host populations and interspecific parasite interactions are therefore likely within a host individual. As they may seriously impact the circulation of certain parasites and the emergence and management of infectious diseases, their study is essential. In the field, detecting parasite interactions is rendered difficult by the fact that a large number of co-infected individuals may also be observed when two parasites share common risk factors. To correct for these “false interactions”, methods accounting for parasite risk factors must be used. Methodology/Principal Findings: In the present paper we propose such a method for presence-absence data (i.e., serology). Our method enables the calculation of the expected frequencies of single and double infected individuals under the independence hypothesis, before comparing them to the observed ones using the chi-square statistic. The method is termed “the corrected chi-square.” Its robustness was compared to a pre-existing method based on logistic regression and the corrected chi-square proved to be much more robust for small sample sizes. Since the logistic regression approach is easier to implement, we propose as a rule of thumb to use the latter when the ratio between the sample size and the number of parameters is above ten. Applied to serological data for four viruses infecting cats, the approach revealed pairwise interactions between the Feline Herpesvirus, Parvovirus and Calicivirus, whereas the infection by FIV, the feline equivalent of HIV, did not modify the risk of infection by any of these viruses. Conclusions/Significance: This work therefore points out possible interactions that can be further investigated in experimental conditions and, by providing a user-friendly R program and a tutorial example, offers new opportunities for animal and human epidemiologists to detect interactions of interest in the field, a crucial step in the challenge of multiple infections.

Suggested Citation

  • Eléonore Hellard & Dominique Pontier & Frank Sauvage & Hervé Poulet & David Fouchet, 2012. "True versus False Parasite Interactions: A Robust Method to Take Risk Factors into Account and Its Application to Feline Viruses," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(1), pages 1-10, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0029618
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029618
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0029618
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0029618&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0029618?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joanne Lello & Brian Boag & Andrew Fenton & Ian R. Stevenson & Peter J. Hudson, 2004. "Competition and mutualism among the gut helminths of a mammalian host," Nature, Nature, vol. 428(6985), pages 840-844, April.
    2. David Fouchet & Guillaume Leblanc & Frank Sauvage & Micheline Guiserix & Hervé Poulet & Dominique Pontier, 2009. "Using Dynamic Stochastic Modelling to Estimate Population Risk Factors in Infectious Disease: The Example of FIV in 15 Cat Populations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(10), pages 1-13, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Frédéric M Hamelin & Linda J S Allen & Vrushali A Bokil & Louis J Gross & Frank M Hilker & Michael J Jeger & Carrie A Manore & Alison G Power & Megan A Rúa & Nik J Cunniffe, 2019. "Coinfections by noninteracting pathogens are not independent and require new tests of interaction," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(12), pages 1-25, December.
    2. Elise Vaumourin & Patrick Gasqui & Jean-Philippe Buffet & Jean-Louis Chapuis & Benoît Pisanu & Elisabeth Ferquel & Muriel Vayssier-Taussat & Gwenaël Vourc’h, 2013. "A Probabilistic Model in Cross-Sectional Studies for Identifying Interactions between Two Persistent Vector-Borne Pathogens in Reservoir Populations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(6), pages 1-9, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adam D Hayward & Daniel H Nussey & Alastair J Wilson & Camillo Berenos & Jill G Pilkington & Kathryn A Watt & Josephine M Pemberton & Andrea L Graham, 2014. "Natural Selection on Individual Variation in Tolerance of Gastrointestinal Nematode Infection," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-13, July.
    2. Rose E Donohue & Zoë K Cross & Edwin Michael, 2019. "The extent, nature, and pathogenic consequences of helminth polyparasitism in humans: A meta-analysis," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-41, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0029618. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.